u/BigotryExterminator

Maybe women want equality because women are human beings too. Wanting equal dignity, safety, opportunity, and respect is not “wanting to become men.” It’s wanting to be treated like a full human being. Men and women are both half of humanity. Your gender alone is not a personality trait or an accomplishment. Become the best version of yourself instead of worshipping an accident of birth. The “opposite gender” he looks down on is the same gender that literally gave birth to him.

People who genuinely achieve things take pride in their character, skills, hard work, knowledge, or contributions to society. People with nothing of their own to be proud of often cling to gender, caste, race, or religion to feel superior. And being a beneficiary of historical privilege does not make someone inherently better. Much of history’s achievements came from people who had access to wealth, education, power, and opportunities others were denied. That says more about systems than superiority.

Also funny how some men boast about being the “risk-taking gender” while men overwhelmingly dominate violent crime statistics, wars, m-rders, ass-ults, prison populations. But of course I won't generalize on the basis of this that women are superior. It's silly.

Maybe women want equality because women are human beings too. Wanting equal dignity, safety, opportunity, and respect is not “wanting to become men.” It’s wanting to be treated like a full human being. Men and women are both half of humanity. Your gender alone is not a personality trait or an accomplishment. Become the best version of yourself instead of worshipping an accident of birth. The “opposite gender” he looks down on is the same gender that literally gave birth to him.

People who genuinely achieve things take pride in their character, skills, hard work, knowledge, or contributions to society. People with nothing of their own to be proud of often cling to gender, caste, race, or religion to feel superior. And being a beneficiary of historical privilege does not make someone inherently better. Much of history’s achievements came from people who had access to wealth, education, power, and opportunities others were denied. That says more about systems than superiority.

Also funny how some men boast about being the “risk-taking gender” while men overwhelmingly dominate violent crime statistics, wars, m-rders, ass-ults, prison populations. But of course I won't generalize on the basis of this that women are superior. It's silly.

This imbecile isn’t blaming r*pists or r*pe culture for SA instead he’s blaming women’s commission, government, and feminism 🤡Ok! If feminists failed how exactly will you as a man teach your fellow men not to r-pe about anything at all. Whether it’s babies, old women, animals, or even corpses? And with all this “bro code” and male solidarity you people brag about, why are r-pes still happening? Maybe stop deflecting responsibility onto women and start addressing the mentality of the perpetrators. And work on your own victim blaming mentality

That is not the flex you think it is mate!

That is not the flex you think it is mate!

That's not the flex you think it is mate!

A historical discussion is one thing. Constantly degrading women to make your point is another. This woman constantly says, “I’m not a feminist but I always stand with women.” Really? Because I have genuinely never seen her stand with women unless it’s a selective case where she can push c-ste!st or ideological narratives. Most of her content is just mocking, berating, and moral-policing women while engaging with misogynistic male accounts. Now look at this latest story. Instead of discussing and with nuance, she starts attacking "modern" women with “50+ body count” insults. Why was that even necessary? If your goal was historical discussion, you could have made your point without reducing random women to misogynistic stereotypes.

And the irony gets crazier when you realize this is the same woman who posts “virtuous woman” lines from Kamasutra about wives needing permission, surrendering to husbands, and revolving their lives around men. Yet she herself is constantly online bragging to her mostly male audience about how “chaste” and “virtuous” she is. If modesty and chastity are supposed to be so private and sacred, then why are 25k mostly male followers constantly being updated about your personal purity? Doesn’t that itself invite unnecessary male attention according to the same standards you preach to other women? And then she has the audacity to randomly accuse other women of having “50+ body counts.” Based on what exactly? Existing? Disagreeing with you?

Also, let’s not forget this is the same Manuwadi mindset that romanticizes things like men taking second wives for reproduction if a woman cannot conceive. We are in 2026 and people are still glorifying this while pretending it’s “pro-woman.” The biggest issue here isn’t even history, it’s the obsession with humiliating modern women at every opportunity while disguising it as “culture,” “dharma,” or “tradition.”