▲ 35 r/BoomersBeingCools+2 crossposts

People loves to bash Baby Boomers, but when they were our age, they forced through the most progressive legislative era in modern history. What has our generation actually built?

Every day there's a new front-page post blaming Baby Boomers for everything from the housing market to climate change. But if we are being intellectually honest and look at what Boomers accomplished when they were in their late teens, 20s, and early 30s (the 1960s and 1970s), their youth-led movements literally rewrote the rules of civilization.

Look at the baseline rights we take for granted today that young Boomers marched for and forced governments to pass:

Civil Rights & Anti-Discrimination: The Civil Rights Act (1964), the Voting Rights Act (1965), and Title IX (1972) which desegregated society and institutionalized gender equality in education.

Environmental Protection: Student Boomers practically invented modern environmentalism, forcing the creation of the EPA, the Clean Air Act (1970), the Clean Water Act (1972), and the Endangered Species Act.

Military Reform: They organized massive, disruptive protests that successfully ended conscription and shut down the military draft.

Subsidized Education: They flooded state university systems and pressured governments worldwide to heavily subsidize higher education, making college affordable or outright free for a generation.

They faced down a literal military draft, a deeply segregated society, and rivers that were physically catching fire from corporate pollution—and they used massive civic action to force the system to fix it.

Meanwhile, Millennials are well into their 40s and Gen Z is entering adulthood. Outside of creating the gig economy, hyper-monetized social media apps, and a culture of online slacktivism, what foundational, system-altering legislation have our generations actually united to force through? Have we lost the ability to execute real institutional change, or are we just too distracted?

reddit.com
u/Bretniq — 6 hours ago
▲ 147 r/australia

Private health funds know exactly what specialists charge. Why is this data hidden from us?

Every day, funds like Bupa, Medibank, and HCF process thousands of claims. They have a complete, line-by-item breakdown of exactly what every surgeon, anaesthetist, and specialist charges for specific MBS (Medicare Benefit Schedule) item numbers in your local area.

They know who charges reasonable rates and who is charging a massive premium. Yet, as consumers, we are told to get "Informed Financial Consent" and shop around. How can we shop around when the market data is locked in a corporate vault?

if health funds published this anonymous, aggregated data (e.g., "The average out-of-pocket gap for this procedure in Sydney ranges from $500 to $3,000, with a median of $1,200"), it would completely change the game. It would empower patients to negotiate or find a fair specialist without paying $200+ just for an initial consult to finally see a quote.

Why do health funds protect this data so fiercely? If they genuinely want to lower healthcare costs for members, why keep us entirely in the dark about what doctors are actually charging?

Would love to hear from anyone in health policy or medical billing on why this isn't a public standard.

reddit.com
u/Bretniq — 7 days ago

Private Health funds have data on exactly what surgeons and specialists charge. Why is "the Gap" hidden from us?

Every day, funds like Bupa, Medibank, and HCF process thousands of claims. They have a complete, line-by-item breakdown of exactly what every surgeon, anaesthetist, and specialist charges for specific MBS (Medicare Benefit Schedule) item numbers in your local area.

They know who charges reasonable rates and who is charging a massive premium.Yet, as consumers, we are told to get "Informed Financial Consent" and shop around. How can we shop around when the market data is locked in a corporate vault?

If health funds published this anonymous, aggregated data (e.g., "The average out-of-pocket gap for this procedure in Sydney ranges from $500 to $3,000, with a median of $1,200"), it would completely change the game. It would empower patients to negotiate or find a fair specialist without paying $200+ just for an initial consult to finally see a quote.

Why do health funds protect this data so fiercely? If they genuinely want to lower healthcare costs for members, why keep us entirely in the dark about what doctors are actually charging?

Would love to hear from anyone in health policy or medical billing on why this isn't a public standard.

reddit.com
u/Bretniq — 7 days ago

God or Man?

Is God’s will known only through His explicit words, or can it also be known through reasoned interpretation of those words?

reddit.com
u/Bretniq — 24 days ago

Can I take legal action?

I live in country Victoria and I have serious lung issues. I never smoked cigarettes but I did smoke pot over the years and pretty much brought it off the same guy. Would I be able to take legal action against him?

reddit.com
u/Bretniq — 28 days ago

Can I take legal action?

I live in country Victoria and I have serious lung issues. I never smoked cigarettes but I did smoke pot over the years and pretty much brought it off the same guy. Would I be able to take legal action against him?

reddit.com
u/Bretniq — 28 days ago