Therapy Can Be An Extension Of Marginalization
A thought I’ve been workshopping are similarities between marginalizing people’s (I.e., bigots, racists, etc) perspectives of the people who they marginalize vs the patient-therapist relationship.
Marginalizing people think they are arbiters of objective truth, and if you don’t see their truth about you as an objective fact, there’s something wrong with you.
An example re marginalizing people: fatphobes tend to feel personally offended when they see a fat person who loves themselves because the fat person isn't supposed to accept their “deficit”, they’re supposed to see themselves as “defective” as the fatphobe sees them. “How dare they not understand how inadequate and (especially if they’re a woman) unattractive they are? They should be hiding their body, not flaunting it.”
An example re the patient-therapist relationship: the therapist discounts the patients thoughts and experiences and essentially pushes the patient to adopt a perception of themselves that is equivalent to the therapist’s perspective of them. “It’s important that I get them to understand the truth of their problems, which I, as a person who has known them for a few weeks, can dictate. They must see things the way I see them in order for the ‘treatment’ to stick. And if they disagree with my perspective, that’s even more proof of their illness.” (Disclaimer: I don’t think this would apply to people in denial of things like addiction, harm they’ve done, or psychological symptoms like delusions or hallucinations)
In the end the outcome is the same: either agree or be wrong. Misogynists demand that women recognize the “reality” of their inadequacies and place in society, and any woman that doesn’t recognize that and act in accordance to the misogynist’s expectation is faulty and needs correction. Racists demand that Black people recognize the “reality” of their inferiority, and any Black person that doesn’t recognize this and defies the racist’s expectation is an existential threat or “uppity” and needs correction. I’m sure there are other examples for other marginalizations, but I’m only using examples that apply to me personally.
The essential thought can end up being: “This person who I view as less than human thinks of themselves as a complete and worthy human being, and needs correction”.
One way I know if marginalization is occurring is how they respond to new evidence. There is no amount of evidence that can change their mind unless it comes from people not within the group they’re marginalizing. Even then, theres a limit, that one thing would be the exception, but they’ll still keep the other rules.