u/Broad-Sentence-5587

They are those who want socialism for their own race & their own race only. Those who want racial nationalism to dictate the terms of the worker; just like the national socialists of Germany in the 1900's!

Communism is predicated on the liberation of the workers of the WORLD!

From my understanding, socialism is the public/worker ownership of the means of production, while communism is a historical analysis over the modes of production throughout human history & a call to action based on that analysis (the call to action being the liberation of the workers of the world).

Therefore any socialists who do not concern themselves with such a historical analysis & the call to action associated w/ it, would not be communist.

Is this a fair understanding?

Looking at the Muscogee Nation, despite the public ownership over various industries (hospitality & gaming, meat packing & ranching operations, etc.), their is a common rhetoric of pushing towards private ownership (although native) over the means of production; as evident in their manufacturing, healthcare, construction, and various food industries.

Overall, as the goal of socialism is the abolition of class dynamics & the liberation of the working class, does this goal come into conflict with returning lands to potentially pro-capitalist nations?

In other words, is there such a change in the zeitgeist as to further motivate more electoral participation by socialists?