How is the Ransom Note Not enough to indict ?
I’ve heard the DA isn’t prosecuting the grand juries indictment with lack of evidence. I think the note itself gives beyond a doubt the Ramseys were involved.
What kidnapper writes a 3 page ransom note inside the house with the Ramseys own writing tools, while committing such a crime & the practice note is odd. No kidnapper stays in a home that active for that long especially if they’re holding the girl ransom. She would be moved into the ‘factions custody’
Why would the kidnapper and writer of the ransom note want John to get a good sleep?? Give so much detail about their own personal motive? Quote movies ?
The 118k is very unusual and probably not something a IDI would know and also, this is a beauty pageant star on Christmas Day, not even 500k? 1mil? The Ramseys are very wealthy any foreign faction with information on them is asking for 1-10mil if not more it’s their ducking daughter
4.Pasty can’t be seriously ruled out of writing analysis
Inconsistencies in the Ramseys own handling/reading of the note. They ignored all warning signs that instructed them how to return their daughter safely. If someone’s going to behead ur daughter and say do not call police or anyone. Yet they invited like the entire neighbourhood over WTF like why are friends allowed in the house.
Nobody called during the time of payment or anything to notify them of their daughters death nor did investigators think the Ramseys were waiting and might’ve forgot
Body inside house. Kidnapping usually means removing or taking someone , why leave her behind at all? Even if they killed her why not ask for ransom for her body for burial if the motive is money?
Sorry but this alone is enough for me. On top of other overwhelming evidence outside of just this piece.