u/BrushSmooth8177

I'm interested in how you are using it in your daily legal work.

I've noticed something while trying it: getting a truly usable draft usually requires several attempts.

For example:

* a prompt can summarize a contract well, but the next one loses key details
* the tone changes between responses
* sometimes it omits important risks
* and sometimes even invents jurisprudence if not properly guided

In the end, what seems to save 10–15 minutes ends up requiring quite a bit of review to ensure everything is correct.

Where is the biggest problem today using AI in BigLaw?

The accuracy?
Confidentiality?
The billing?
Or simply the lack of trust in these tools?

In the field of LegalTech, one of the main obstacles to automating analysis tasks is the lack of consistency in the responses provided by language models. The same contract may receive different evaluations depending on how the query is phrased. To address this, weighted instruction structures (WSPM) are being used. By defining a weighted hierarchy and operators in the instruction, the model reduces the generation of irrelevant information and maintains the same analytical criteria in each iteration. Here is one of the formulas used for contract auditing:

Analysis = (Verifiable Facts 40% + Contractual Risk Indicators 30% + Missing Evidence 20% + Difficulty to Prove 10%)

This method uses weighted limits to force the interface to break down the final report according to the assigned percentages, compelling the model to stay within the boundaries of the assigned context, which generates a much more consistent and structured result. How do you handle these issues?

The firm is evaluating alternatives to traditional corporate licenses for document review, as clients do not cover those billable hours. When comparing the performance of commercial tools against open-source models (such as Llama) configured in-house, we noticed that the key to accuracy lies solely in the structure of the instructions (prompts based on logical operators). But we have concerns regarding long-term regulatory compliance. How do they manage data governance under the GDPR or ISO certifications when training these internal models with the firm’s databases? Is it feasible to rely on a proprietary prompt architecture to match the accuracy of plugins like Claude without compromising security?

[ Removed by Reddit on account of violating the content policy. ]

I think Chatgpt, Gemini, and Claude only apply these features to paid plans if they meet the minimum requirements, but I don't think they apply to free plans. Ultimately, it might be true that if the product is free, then you are the product.

Hola, he estado trabando en mi jefe en un dia, y en ese dia todo iba bien asta que eran la hora de salida, cuando yo le dije que queria salir me dijo que tienes que hacer horas extra, le dije que no me hace falta las horas extra y me fui, al dia siguiente cuando volvi ahi a trabjar me dijo que estaba despedido, le pregunte el porque , el me respondio porque tenias que hacer las horas extra de forma obligatorias ,el dije que no las nacessito, y me dij oque estas despedido.

Cuando volvi a darme el finiquito y el sueldo de ese dia, me dijo que me tenias que firma un cotrato de el otro dia, y yo firme ,peor cuando l ovi vi que era la firma un cotrato de baja volutaria cuando yo no queira por solamente las horas extra , de el dinero ,era visible, pero yo lo fimre igualemte, y cuando me di cuenta es que me redujeiro unas deducioens que no tien base , ni de impuetos proque son de el 50 prociento, y ni siqueiram e hbaia pagado lo correspondido, tego planeado a ir a hablar con los cotabels de la mepresa par aclarar l oque esta pasando. Me gustaria saber que peudo hacer legalemte si no colabrona y como yo puedo responder ante el contrato que firme pero no era lo que habia pasado?.

Location: NY