Current Shortlist for Boy #3
I know my posts have been repetitive on here, I’m sorry. We keep circling around different matchups of the same names.
We have gone through thousands of names, and last night I kept bringing up old previously vetoed names to see if my husband had changed his mind on any. As of last night, this is the shortlist he is okay with, with the exception of one that he is “trying to warm up to” but hasn’t vetoed yet.
Our older boys are Warren Patrick and Clyde Theodore, for reference.
Morris Ambrose > Mo, Morrie, Mose, Mosey
Linus Augustine
Gilbert Wilder > Gil, Gib, Gibs, Gibby, Gilby, Bertie, Bertie Boy
Grover Benjamin > Groves, Grove, Grovey
Two random ones that we are sort of meh on but he kind of likes:
Merrill
Lowry
I know it is a name people either love or absolute disagree with, but I cannot explain it other than ever since I have been pregnant with this baby, Grover has felt the most *right* to me. Grover was on my long list for a few years and every time I saw it I thought it was probably too out there or not something I would ever want to actually use. When I got pregnant with this baby and we found out it was another boy, suddenly a lot of the names we previously liked just felt so off and wrong to me and Grover was the only thing that felt right. But, my husband isn’t a fan. He hasn’t outright vetoed it and says he is trying to warm up to it- which, our older boys’ names he didn’t like the first time he heard them and then changed his mind and liked them.
Gilbert we found back and forth on whether we can picture actually using in daily life or not.
Linus is my husband’s top pick and I was the one who convinced him on it in the first place, but when I try to connect it with this baby it just feels off to me. I like it on paper and think it is cohesive with our other boys’ names, but I something about the way it feels and sounds when I say it out loud grates me.
Morris we both like, he likes it less than Linus. I like it a fair bit, but I sometimes wonder if it feels a little blah or lackluster.