u/ConclusionForeign856

Strasznie mnie wnerwia to, że w większości sklepów jeśli warzywa/owoce są przecenione, to prawdopodobnie po prostu są już z pleśnią, ale menadżer stwierdził że jeszcze aż tak nie widać.

Naprawdę super okazja. -40% na opakowanie owoców, gdzie 30% jest wyraźnie spleśniałe, a 60% będzie jutro, czyli 90% opakowania jest już zepsute.

Sam fakt, że w każdej sieci sklepów typowo znajduję na wystawie śpleśniałe owoce to absurd. A co dopiero jeszcze je wciskać niby po taniości xd

https://preview.redd.it/3h7dftrhefgh1.png?width=600&format=png&auto=webp&s=fb2d6547ae058dafd151da89d19c421060b511a9

https://preview.redd.it/i2k1gwf5oegh1.png?width=882&format=png&auto=webp&s=5869aa212ec8326f36b819a74a12f8b12888676f

I completed biology BSc (focused on molecular biology and cell culturing) and bioinformatics MSc (with a structural+ML thesis project).

Right now I have roughly two available PhD positions:

1. wet lab
   A well established senior PI, good funding for research materials but also a competitive salary (roughly twice the university doctoral school stipend and slightly above the median salary in the nation). Project involves creating cell culture models of rare genetic diseases, transcriptomic data analysis and confocal microscopy. The computational part is likely to be almost completely based on standardized pipelines and plays a supporting role in the project.

2. comp. biophysics
   My MSc supervisor, not as well established lab but with good track record of publications. Focus is on MD simulations, particularly on transmembrane transporters. Only wet lab work is done by collaborators at other institutions. Funding would be much lower (doctoral school stipend + possible bonuses from grants, overall around half of the previous position's).

I know both PIs, and both are great scientist and likely the least toxic ones I know, both know me personally.

1st position really stands out funding wise, and I enjoy the type of wet lab that I'd do there. Though I might miss more extensive computational work, and I worry I'd fall out of the computational field, i.e. would not be worth it to focus on computations full time after that PhD, because I'd be behind compared to specialists.

2nd position is paid as poorly as any other typical PhD position. I always liked high resolution explanations of molecular mechanisms based on chemistry and physics, so whatever I'd keep doing at this lab is bound to be interesting to me. Though from what I know about the field, it's hard getting an academic position later on regardless of the field, and structural comp. bio. is in lower demand compared to omics. I also know bioinformaticians can end up being a support-scientist, where your job is to provide services (analysis, data storage, creating figures), in which case you end up as more of a super-technician, than a researcher.

Ideally I'd like to find a way to stay in both novel computations and wet lab molecular biology with focus on molecular mechanisms, though I don't think it's plausible to do that and don't loose to specialists in the end. Of course I know exceptions, but they're just that, and I'd rather specialize in something, and have a chance at working in the field, rather than end up with a conversation-starter PhD.

Of course I can also search for other positions, but these two are imo the best ones available right now. This is in EU.

Jan, profesor matematyki, ma problemy ze zlewem w kuchni. Dzwoni więc do hydraulika. Hydraulik przychodzi, w trymiga naprawia usterkę. Profesorowi jednak rzednie mina kiedy dowiaduje się ile jest winien. Mówi hydraulikowi, "Jak ty możesz tyle liczyć? To połowa mojej wypłaty".

Na to hydraulik, "Hej, na hydraulików jest ssanie. Mógłbyś zmienić zawód i potroić swoje zarobki. Musisz tylko im powiedzieć, że nie masz matury, oni nie lubią wykształconych."

Profesor przyjmuje ofertę, zostaje hydraulikiem i potraja swoje zarobki. Jedyny problem to, że firma wymyśliła sobie, że wszyscy hydraulicy muszą mieć maturę, i organizuje obowiązkowe wieczorowe zajęcia przygotowawcze z matematyki.

Pierwszego dnia nauczyciel zaczyna od podstaw geometrii. Woła Jana do tablicy, "Janek, jaki jest wzór na pole koła?"

Jan podchodzi, bierze kredę do ręki i uświadamia sobie że zapomniał! Zaczyna wyprowadzać wzór. Cała tablica pokrywa się rachunkami. Wychodzi mu -πr². "Długość nie może być ujemna, gdzieś jest błąd". Niestety znowu wychodzi dokładnie to samo, gapi się w tablicę zmieszany, a wtedy z tyłu sali ktoś krzyczy "Zamień granice całkowania!"