Hi all, I hope everyone’s weekend is going well. I wanted to request your help with a referral at EY for a position I’m extremely interested (and qualified) in. I’m on the verge of sinking and an opportunity like this could really turn the tide for the good. Please help out if you can. I’ll share my resume and the job/requisition ID in the DMs if anyone’s willing.
Cheers!
I met my boyfriend on tinder in October 2025. We dated for 6 months but I had trust issues and a gut feeling that he was not loyal and still using tinder on and off. I made a fake account to keep an eye on him and immediately found his profile. I swiped on him and he swiped me back and then he talked to my fake profile in a very sexual manner, shared his phone number asking to call and meeting up at his place saying he lives alone. When I caught him, he shifted the blame on me saying I am overreacting and choti si baat ko bada bana raha hu and uska intention nahi tha kyuki vo sirf masti mazaak ke liye tinder use karta tha. Is this not cheating? Is this just masti mazaak?
Wouldn’t say I’m not disappointed, but I wasn’t expecting the cut-off to be this high, honestly. I wonder if the fact that the exam was virtually conducted and the proctoring not properly done had something to do with it.
To those who made the cut, congratulations. To those who didn’t, it’s not the end of the world :)
(Original post linked in comments)
There’s a very specific kind of delusion in getting a law degree in your 50s and turning it into a Gen Z critique.
As a lawyer myself, I can attest that a law degree from Maharaja Krishnakumarsinhji Bhavnagar University (a university that has constantly been unranked and largely unheard of in the legal industry and accredited with barely a ‘C’ grade by NAAC) is not the flex he thinks it is, especially when you’re using it to talk down to people half your age. If anything, it weakens the point you’re trying to make.
You’re comparing yourself to 18 year olds as if the situations are even remotely similar. They are not. An 18 year old stepping into their first degree is dealing with real pressure. Their career depends on it. Their financial independence depends on it. They’re adjusting to new environments, expectations, and the reality that early mistakes have consequences.
You are doing this with financial stability, an already established life, and no meaningful downside. Your career does not depend on this degree. Your day to day life does not change based on how this turns out. This is something you chose to do, not something you needed to survive or move forward.
So when you criticise Gen Z for boundaries or work ethic, it just sounds out of touch. You are not operating under the same stakes, so the comparison does not hold.
And attaching that rant to your degree does not make it more impressive. It just makes it look like the achievement needed extra noise to feel relevant.
Could have been a simple, respectable milestone. Instead it turned into an unnecessary attempt to sound superior to a group that was never in competition with you in the first place.
Dimwits like him enable toxic work environments and when the so-called entitled ‘Gen-Zs’ take a stand against it, they are suddenly the problem.
Any idea about what the cutoffs have been like for the previous years (to get an idea about what it might be this time)