Is this too good to be true?
For one client in particular, we switched from a Meta leads campaign to a website leads campaign. We created very specific creative around personas, and we set up the conversions API and made sure the tracking was clean. We also did an imported lookalike audience based off of the high-converting customers (which I know is more of a suggestion now).
The lead quality seems to be strong so far. I'm shocked at the amount of leads that we're getting and the low cost per conversion around $5.50, which is actually already much better than the Meta leads campaign. I know lead quality is, of course, more important, so we're monitoring that, but so far it seems good. We are using incremental attribution too.
I've heard so many complaints about Meta lately that I'm questioning this. Curious if anybody else has dealt with this and if they're seeing good results.