u/Difficult_Tough9178

Where are y'all who were blaming Pakistan bfr? It's a worldwide issue, not just Pakistan

WHY DI YOU GUYS EVEN KAEL? LIKE GEN1LY WHAT DO YOU EVEN GET FROM THIS? THE PAPER GETS RESCHEDULE, WE HAVE TO DO A RETAKE, ITS A LOSE SITUATION LIKE I CANT FIND A SINGLE REASON WHY PEOPLE LEAK AND BCZ OF SM GUYS THE WHOLE OF PAKISTAN IS GETTING BLAMED, LIKE LTRLY I WANNA CURSE OUT EVERYONE WHO KEALED IT 💔😭😭

Guys what do I do? I have my maths M1 in 5 days and comp in 7 days and since the maths p1 was leaked, the grade might depend entirely on M1, so I have to prepare for it shi SE, lekn there's comp P1 too, and I suck at comp theory Wala hisa, I was thinking about leaving yesterday and today for comp them the next 4 days for M1, this way it would be equal, but my M1 sucks too 😭, I need help guys.

Guys we should report both of these, one was kael while the other gave an unfair disadvantage to sum people

To: info@cambridgeinternational.org

CC: info.bd@britishcouncil.org

Dear Sir/Madam,

I am writing to raise a serious concern regarding the conduct and fairness of the Physics Practical examination 9702/33 held on 28 April 2026.

My name is [Full Name], Centre Number: [XXX], Candidate Number: [XXX]. I appeared for this examination at [time, including time zone].

The structure of the examination required candidates to complete two questions (Q1 and Q2), with one hour allocated to each. As per standard procedure, candidates were divided into two groups: one group completed Q1 first while the other completed Q2.

However, there was a significant imbalance in the length and difficulty of the two questions. Q1 was lengthy and time-consuming, requiring extensive readings. Many candidates, including myself, were unable to complete all required components within the allocated one hour. In contrast, Q2 was relatively straightforward and could be completed comfortably in much less than the allocated time.

This created a clear disadvantage based solely on the order in which candidates received the questions. Candidates who were assigned Q1 first were able to continue and complete it during the second hour after switching. Meanwhile, candidates who completed Q2 first had no productive use of the remaining time in the first hour and, upon switching, were unable to finish Q1 within the limited time available. This resulted in a potential loss of marks (estimated around 8–10 marks or more) for those candidates.

Such an outcome introduces an element of chance into the examination process, where performance is influenced not by ability or preparation, but by the random allocation of question order. This undermines the fairness and integrity of the assessment.

In light of this, I respectfully request that Cambridge Assessment International Education consider appropriate measures to address this issue. I respectfully request that the following solutions be considered.

- Adjustments in marking or grade thresholds to account for the imbalance

- Consideration of special allowances for affected candidates

- A review of examiner reports and candidate performance data to ensure fairness

I trust that this matter will be taken seriously and that necessary steps will be implemented to ensure that no candidate is unfairly disadvantaged due to factors beyond their control.

Thank you for your time and consideration. I look forward to your response.

Yours faithfully,

[Full Name]

Candidate Number: [XXX]

Centre Number: [XXX]

Country: [Your Country]

Guys please spam this, tell your teachers/section heads/principal etc to raise this issue to Cambridge/British council

GUYS LETS REPORT FOR Q1, CAUSE NO WAY ANYONE(who got Q2 first) COMPLETED IR