Hair is NOT nudity.
Someone brought this up in a previous post of mine.
Muslims often react very badly to women not wearing hijab. Heck, even if you are wearing hijab, they'll still react if you're wearing it "incorrectly": showing some hair, your neck, or not dressing "modestly" enough.
But if showing your hair is supposedly akin to nudity, then why do Muslims have no problem interacting with non-hijabi women?
Think about it; if you saw a naked person, you wouldn't just shrug it off. You would avoid looking, leave the area, or call the police. It wouldn't matter what that person's religion or beliefs are.
By that logic, Muslims shouldn't even be outside, because they're technically surrounded by "nudity."
But that's the thing.
You know, I know, and we all know that hair isn't sexual. Hair is not a sexual organ. No sane person reacts to hair the way they would to actual nudity.
And why hair, of all things? A woman's face is arguably more attractive than her hair. If the concern is preventing attraction, why is the face left uncovered?
At least niqabis are consistent.
Even when I wore hijab, I never found the "it's about modesty" argument convincing. Because what is immodest about hair?
It's more accurate to call hijab a religious symbol, similar to a yarmulke or turban, then something for "modesty".