u/DreadIcarus

Spurs All In Idea #2 ATL TOR

People didn't like the last time I made a post trying to make the Spurs even more elite this offseason, but I still think it's a rare opportunity they should take. I think moving DeAaron Fox could be a good move, to put that money into other positions now that their guards are completely fine without him.

Step 1:

SAS recieves: #8

ATL recieves: #20 + 27frp + 3-4 seconds

Maybe that's not enough to move up but the Spurs have a ton of seconds.

Step 2: Trade Fox for Forward

Idea

SAS recieves: Brandon Ingram, Gradey Dick

TOR recieves: DeAaron Fox + 2-3srp

I know it's kind of a weird idea and I'm expecting people to hate it, but trading up to 8 gives them another young guard for injury insurance and depth for like 8M. Fox definitely wouldn't be needed anymore, and my one criticism of the Spurs is they seem short at true forwards. Some of that can be fixed in free agency, but they can afford to trade for a forward that is used to being a role player but can score 15-20 a game. Other guys I liked for them are Dillon Brooks and Trey Murphy, but I'm not sure how trading Fox to get them would work. The only hard thing is how much money Fox is making in the coming years, but if a team wants to bank of him playing like an All-Star again, they could take him for a reduced price

reddit.com
u/DreadIcarus — 2 days ago

Spurs all in with Warriors and Magic

I feel like given that the Spurs are finally in contention, and have a lot of draft picks, they have a chance to build a team that can contend for at least the next 5 years.

I know these trades aren't balanced, I just don't know what draft capital needs to be given up. So do you think think the teams do these trades and what draft picks need to be given up.

T1

Spurs receive: Draymond Green, Brandin Podziempski

Warriors Recieve: Devin Vassell

T2

Spurs receive: Franz Wagner

Magic receive: DeAaron Fox

reddit.com
u/DreadIcarus — 6 days ago

Frq 3 was kinda mean?

Is it just me or was the probability for part A being a decimal kind of dumb? I think I got 0.247 but I didn’t rlly know if I should use the rounded number for the subsequent steps. Also what was the interpretation for the standard deviation? I think I tried to go empirical rule and said if replicated it would be within 1 sd of the mean 68% of the time, but that felt like a bad answer

reddit.com
u/DreadIcarus — 15 days ago