Supabase vs RDS when you only need managed Postgres?
I’m comparing Supabase and RDS for a small production app and honestly neither feels like an obvious choice.
Supabase looks much easier to get started with, but I don’t really need auth, storage, realtime etc. I mainly need Postgres. once the app grows, the usage based parts of the pricing also seem harder to estimate.
RDS gives more control and I trust AWS for production, but then the bill is split across instance, storage, backups, I/O, networking and HA. it feels like a lot for a relatively normal Postgres workload.
What I actually want is pretty simple:
- always-on managed Postgres
- backups and maintenance handled
- predictable monthly pricing
- good regions in Asia
- standard Postgres so I can move later if required
Would you still pick Supabase or RDS for this, or is there a better middle option I should be looking at?