Are non-sprouting grains dead and have lower nutritional value?
I understand that there is enhanced nutritional value in sprouted grains such as higher nutrient absorption and increased vitamins and minerals. This is something well established in scientific literature.
I’ve recently come across a post on Instagram that I can’t find solid evidence for, but I’ve also been hearing this from someone I know in real life too, so I want to know if there’s any truth to it or if it’s just pseudoscience.
The claim is as follows:
“SPROUTING WHEAT determines if the wheat kernel is still alive, meaning can it grow and gives the body the nutrients needed. Recently we were given someone's very old bags of wheat so this post is how we determined if the wheat was still alive for maximum nutritional values. I must say sprouting and soaking wheat has been a part of cultures all over the world. Sprouting reduces phytic acid - an enzyme that inhibits our digestive system from absorbing nutrients.
Sprouting wheat also stabilizes natural oils in the wheat and reduces bitterness and enhances natural flavor.
Germinated grains contain 700 times more magnesium five times more calcium and 12 times more phosphorus. Storing wheat seeds (sometimes called wheat berries) is cheaper and also has a longer shelflife than storing just flour that's already ground. For us, we want maximum nutrition to go into our bodies so if the wheat cannot be sprouted and is dead, then it becomes chicken and animal food on our farm.”
However, I’m failing to understand why grains should be tested for their sprouting ability to determine their nutritional state. From what I understand, there are several factors that can influence a grains sprouting ability such as how old it is and whether it was subject to heat treatment. If a batch of grains do not sprout, is that really an indicator of “dead” grains and should they really just be thrown out as farm food?
If anyone can provide scientifically backed clarification, that will be great.
Thank you.