What if instead of rdr3 Rockstar decides to make new red dead games but just not another having “redemption” in the main title
Before I get to the main point, most of us here should know that when red dead first existed, the first rdr we got was red dead revolver, not red dead redemption, then we got red dead redemption 6 years later and 8 years after that we got red dead redemption 2 serving as a prequel to red dead redemption 2010, now the reason that game was called red dead redemption 2 because it served as an origin to the fallout of the van der linde gang which most of it caused John marston’s problem in red redemption 1. The latest year you get to as you progress is 1914 and by the time we get to there we would have ww1 which isnt quite fitting for a red dead game so Rockstar kinda has two choices 1 they can make an rdr3 but would have to be another prequel for the van der linde gang because we still don’t know the full story of blackwater and maybe the main lead could be Mac callahan, Or second! They could make a new red dead game with a new story focusing either on a new protagonist we never met or heard or someone we do know like maybe a younger version of Landon ricketts but it would have to have a different r name that isn’t redemption, What I’m trying to say is after gta 6 releases do you think it’s possible rockstar might make another rdr game in the “redemption” branch, or would you rather they just made different red dead games that go with different r titles like red dead revenge or red dead revolution! And they can take place anywhere in the late 1800s and not focusing on ww1! That would help keep it faithful to the wild west roots but what do you guys think?