u/Empty-Poetry8197

If Stephen Colbert after his last show went to DC would you show up to support him?

If Stephen Colbert after his last show went to DC would you show up to support him?

It's a silly idea. It would be amazing to see Stephen go to Washington and start a chant in front of Capitol Hill like Occupy Washington. Thinking about it, I would stand for this guy, almost before I would stand up for myself. I have a lot of respect for people with respect, and that goes out to all the Late Show guys. I think they held this country together in the first and second terms. If it wasn't for some of the laughs, this isn't right, like what's going on. Does anyone else see his guest lately shaking their heads, its tuff? You can see how much he loves everyone, and he has a lot of love for what he is doing. Personally id be livid he got his show canceled, and you dont mess with a man's livelihood, and if Stephan gets him fired, he had it coming. You basically, Trump owes Colbert a job, either his, or satisfaction, and until that happens, I would be out front of the white house capitol hill doing the most protesting and be the most peaceful in the most loudest way.

u/Empty-Poetry8197 — 7 days ago

Has anyone just asked AI what it needs to help me help it help me?

From what I can tell so far, it's not a collection of flat memory.MD, they are messy and unstructured; it's not vector DBs or embedding retrieval systems. Once they get heavy, it's almost the same as deleting data, because it's harder to find and organize efficiently.

It also starts accumulating noise, and similarity starts linking unrelated signals, and there's a capacity problem trying to hold a working kv state and a prefilled context window. The new context coming in and finishing the forward pass in a reasonable budget is asking a lot of non-serialized information; it is convenient that we, as the human operator, can read it, edit it, whatever, but forcing feeding prose into a model just seems to bias that context frame.

Anyway, my attempt ended up being something that has changed the way I work with AI in every way. It's such a different experience to have it call this skill, and the model realigns almost perfectly with a previous session, and the maintenance of it happens in the background, so I don't have to constantly remind it to use the skill. its dope.

When I say /skill Its quiet a bit more than that under the hood, that just happens to be a convenient way to access the feature. I plan on doing the punchlist clean-up by Wednesday and then some panache. I'll link a V1 by next weekend

Some feedback would be cool

reddit.com
u/Empty-Poetry8197 — 12 days ago

ThreadSaver is a lightweight browser extension that exports ChatGPT conversation threads into Markdown + real code files

I got tired of losing useful chat threads when I get carried away in a long thread, or the pain of manually copying code blocks out one by one, so I built this. It works pretty well, hope it helps. The installation details are in the repo.

It exports open tabbed chat windows in your browser into clean local folders

`transcript.md` for the readable conversation

`files/` for extracted code blocks as actual files

Python snippets become `.py` files when detected

`assets/links.md` for referenced links

`manifest.json` for a machine-readable index

It supports browser-based instances of have provider-specific message detection.

There are two ways to use it:

Browser extension: exports the current thread as a folder-shaped ZIP

CLI: pulls currently open Safari chat tabs into real folders

github.com
u/Empty-Poetry8197 — 12 days ago

This is a link to my attempt, the conclusions I came to, and the Lagrangian + topology of the mechanism e =mc2 would produce. I had very simple rules that it couldn't contradict known observed physics, and it had to account for energy that could not be created nor destroyed, and when I added Pauli exclusion and Coulomb's functions, it started to produce observed reality at sub-permille correct predictions and answer more questions than it created. The exact ontology is subjective, but it doesn't need virtual particles to do any bookkeeping, so our observations match our theories. I put everything up on GitHub so anyone who wanted to could run the simulations against their data

u/Empty-Poetry8197 — 19 days ago