u/Even-Tomorrow5468

▲ 2 r/dsa

As to the Situation in Ukraine

I've seen this come up enough now and the divide it has created to want to address the elephant in the room regarding the Ukraine war.

A big reason why people are scared and hesitant to join our tent is because we get a lot of crazy stances on the Ukraine war that come off as wanting to support Russia without directly supporting Russia - namely this fear that by sending Ukraine weapons, whichever nation does so is prolonging war or supporting Imperialism. What also comes up is the idea that Ukraine, by striking into Russia, is somehow the offensive force.

Let's clear up some air here so we don't frighten everyone drawn in by socialized medicine and safety nets but scared away by this idea we're going to support imperialist war mongers.

We know what Putin's objective is. We know how he intends to achieve it. We know his word is empty because he's attacked nations unprovoked before and set up puppet governments. I'd hesitate to even call Russia communist at this point considering how much money controls its functions considering everything having to do with Wildberries and the merchants using it. By the very rules of this sub, it should be against the rules to root for Putin in any measure, because his aims are definitively imperialist in nature - he wants to progressively control more of Europe and Asia, and the bully has encountered someone ready and willing to hit back and stop him. This idea that ceding territory to him to make him stop has historical parallels to the appeasement strategies that failed to hinder Hitler's rise in Europe. If you give things to a bully, the bully will keep taking from you. It's a basic concept.

Supporting Ukraine does not mean you are supporting imperialism by prolonging war, it means you are giving them the means to prevent Russian imperialism. It's a simple concept. Most of what Ukraine actively wants from the EU and the USA anyway are anti-air weapons to stop Russia from bombing apartment complexes, historical sites, and culture centers. They already have the drones to slow and eventually stop the Russian war machine.

In regards to Ukrainian strikes into Russia, let's not pretend this is a means of Ukraine counter-invading Russian land. The Ukrainian drone strikes into Russia have been to disrupt supply lines and make contested territory into murder nests to stop the Russian advance, attacks on key infrastructure to weaken Russia's economy and slow their production of weapons and vehicles, and attacks on power plants and service stations to blind them and prevent their advance. Why do you think they took so long to bomb the obvious bridge targets in Crimea? They've outright said they wanted to give civilians time to leave before taking back Crimea.

And the idea that taking Crimea means they're 'imperialist' ignores the fact that until 2014, Crimea was their territory that an imperialist power stole. Holding Crimea would be the ultimate morale boost to Ukraine and a signal to Russia that their war with Ukraine is untenable. That's when Ukraine can force Moscow to the negotiating table to return the lands stolen from them.

Russia will not return the land they stole or stop trying to advance if Ukraine gives in. Given their absurd ideas for what it would take for them to negotiate with Kyiv basically amount to Ukraine giving them territory and disarming, it does not take a genius to realize what Russia would do in another decade once their economy stabilized and they found countermeasures to Ukrainian drone weapons.

Russia has had the means to stop this assault at any time. The Russians are not the heroes in some fairytale here. If they wanted the war to stop, they could have kept their promises in 2014 and actually stopped at Crimea.

By offering no support to Ukraine we'd basically be okaying an ethnic cleansing campaign by Russia, as it needs to be stressed most of the areas they target with their missiles are libraries, children's hospitals, historical sites, and apartment complexes. We don't need to provide Ukraine with weapons, they just need anti air technology to stop themselves from getting shelled.

Show compassion. The quickest way to win over the uncertain who recognize the Democratic establishment doesn't represent them is to highlight morally righteous action, like kneecapping billionaires and making healthcare and education free for all. It's not to come across as a Putin apologist hypocrite that decries imperialism but forgives the process if it comes from Russia.

And to any prospective members scared off by this idea that the DSA actually supports Russia, know that those voices are the minority. We're happy to have you, and happy Bernie, or AOC, or Mamdani, or some other high-profile voice for our cause convinced you to join us.

reddit.com
u/Even-Tomorrow5468 — 1 day ago
▲ 3 r/Falcom

I Need Help to Make Sense of Something in Endgame Reverie

So, I've been following along with the plot and the lore, and I figured out the deal with >!Ishmelga Rean rather quickly, though not for the same reasons Lloyd did.!<

>!I've just beaten Ishmelga of the End, and Ishmelga has been beaten. He has his last laugh, and then... he turns off.!<

>!What.!<

>!How does this work? I thought Elysium plucked him from a different timeline where Rean never got the Earthern Prison and needed to use himself as a prison. That's how Ishmelga Rean can work in the first place, because Ishmelga, a sentient curse, is possessing Rean and fighting him for control. You can make a robot body of Rean, but you can't really make a robot... form... for a curse that possesses people. That doesn't make any sense whatsoever. Even if you could, how would you have it possess a person? Wouldn't that just make them the same basic entity? !<

>!Even if we pretend you can make a curse... program... that possesses people... somehow... then how does the whole assimilation plot work at all? Everyone talks about how Ishmelga Rean is different from the robots they fight, and Lloyd states that's because this is a Rean. It's a Rean from a different timeline that should not exist in this one that reality is trying to reconcile. If it's a robot, then it isn't really an alternate Rean, and it shouldn't be assimilating him at all. Or if being a robot duplicate is an honest criterion for assimilation, then everyone should be threatened by their robots becoming them. How would that even work with three Arioses around?!<

>!Before someone makes the argument 'it's a concept from a different timeline,' the fact Elysium thought it up means it was created in this timeline by an entity from this timeline. If it's not an actual alternate Rean but just a construct of a prediction of a different Rean from a different timeline, then... it's just a reproduction. After even all of that, we have to consider Ishmelga Rean has a spiritual mind palace aspect to him where he's free of the curse, which also makes no sense if he's a robot.!<

>!Please, someone explain how any of this works...!<

reddit.com
u/Even-Tomorrow5468 — 2 months ago

I was rolling around the subreddit when I came across a comment regarding how magick is cast within a specific paradigm that discussed the idea that all paradigms and traditions and the like should have magick that's forbidden because it goes against the paradigm.

Let's say this is correct, and that there's a limit to what spheres a Sahajiya mage or an Etherite can use.

What I'm wondering is - what does everyone think is each Tradition's limit? Do we think it makes sense for there to be a limit? If we do, do all Traditions have the same amount of forbidden spheres? And most importantly - what spheres do we think each Tradition can't use? Why?

This fascinates me because each sphere is given a pretty thorough explanation for how each given Tradition sees it, so even stuff you wouldn't think of (like Life for the Virtual Adepts) has an explanation.

What does everyone think? What are these limitations, if there even are any?

reddit.com
u/Even-Tomorrow5468 — 4 months ago