Interviewing for a Senior Lead AI/Agentic SDLC role, 2nd round is with a VP of SRE. What do they actually drill?
I'm interviewing for a senior role focused on driving adoption of AI coding agents (Copilot, Claude Code) across engineering teams at JPMC. It's an enablement + technical leadership role, not a pure SRE role, but one of the core responsibilities is "testing & resiliency leadership: chaos engineering, fault injection, CI/CD, ensuring fault-tolerant solutions," and there's a heavy "quality, security, compliance, operational excellence" theme.
First round (with an ED) was strategy + system design. The second round (1 hour) is with a VP of SRE.
My background is full-stack + applied AI — I've built and operated real systems (a live trading bot, ML platforms) but I'm not a career SRE. I build and operate; I haven't run formal SRE practice at enterprise scale.
For people who've interviewed with SRE leaders, especially at regulated orgs:
When the role is adoption/enablement but the interviewer is SRE, what do they actually focus on — reliability judgment, or deep SRE theory?
For AI/LLM systems specifically, did they probe reliability of non-deterministic systems, resiliency (chaos/fault injection), testing strategy, incident response?
How much weight on classic SRE canon (SLO/SLI, error budgets, golden signals) vs. how you reason in practice?
Anything AWS/Bedrock-specific?