
SEO practitioners are testing this - are you doing the same?
AI-content detection seems to be moving from standalone detector tools into normal SEO workflows.
Ahrefs added AI-detection signals to its Site Audit URL details on August 1, so teams can inspect likely AI-written sections while reviewing pages.
I can see the use case on large content sites.
If you suddenly have thousands of pages and want to identify sections that may deserve editorial review, detection can be a useful triage signal.
What I wouldn't do is turn the score itself into an SEO KPI.
Google's published position is still that appropriate AI use isn't inherently against its guidelines. Its focus is on original, useful, high-quality content; using automation primarily to manipulate search rankings is the violation.
So:
“Likely AI-written” doesn't automatically mean bad.
And:
“Human-written” definitely doesn't automatically mean good.
I'd rather combine detection with checks for:
- unsupported statements
- repetitive phrasing
- factual errors
- lack of original insight
- weak sourcing
- pages that add almost nothing beyond existing results
Have you started adding AI-detection scores to editorial audits? Are they actually helping you find low-quality pages, or mostly creating false alarms? Also, are you merely deleting AI-written content or revamping it by providing needed value?