u/FairObjective3416

Now that Chat and Cowork seems to be merged on desktop (at least to some users), many of us now have duplicative projects across chat and Cowork that should be merged.

On a whim, I tried to move some of my chats from a Cowork project into the duplicate Chat project today and noticed some gray helper text in the move field that says "not available yet."

So I'm hoping this means that Anthropic has thought about this and will allow us to soon merge chats/cowork across duplicated projects into one project that can handle chat and cowork.

I guess we'll see.

I wasn't able to purchase tickets when the tour initially went on sale. How are people finding the resale market? I'm about a month away from the show that I want to see. Better to buy now or wait till closer to the day of the event? Thanks!

I've been trying out Vivaldi as a replacement for Arc. There's definitely lots to like with Vivaldi, but two things in particular with profile switching would make it a much smoother Arc replacement.

• Ability to switch profiles using keyboard shortcuts
  • In Arc, one could cmd-t, start typing the name of the profile (eg: "work" and switch to that)
  • Also send the current page to another profile using keyboard shortcuts
    • useful if a page was opened with the wrong profile/cookies
• Profiles open in the current window, rather than launching a new window

Is there any talk that this may happen?

Thanks!

Feels like some companies are trying to build a QuickBooks alternative: Puzzle, Digits, Kick. Has anyone had an experience with using them? Do we think any one of them will actually make it in the long run?

Still frustrated with QuickBooks, but not sure there's a real alternative just yet.

I'm kicking the tires on Vivaldi after giving up on Arc (R.I.P.). Is it possible to set Vivaldi so that when I open a new window, it opens in the last open workspace?

I'm not sure if I love that every time I open a new Vivaldi window, it defaults to the generic workspace, which I'm not sure how I feel about anyway, or what its purpose is.

Am I missing something?

So often when I'm using Claude, whether it's through Chat, Cowork, or Code, I'm sharing screenshots with it of what I'm seeing on my screen.

It would be great if there was an optional way to keep Claude persistently aware of what is displayed on my screen so we can have a conversation about it.

Obviously, there is a huge security risk here, and it should be optional and only when toggled on, but I know it would be helpful for me.

Are there any rumors that this might happen? I feel like I saw something about ChatGPT working on something like this, but not from Claude.

Thanks!

I have the same project set up across all three tabs. Before I build something, I chat through it first. Sometimes I’ll kick off a Cowork session that bleeds into a coding problem. The workflow moves fluidly between all three, but the context and memory doesn’t follow me.

I’ve heard Anthropic folks say in interviews that more overlap between these products is coming. Feels like unified context across Chat, Cowork, and Code would be the obvious next step.

Anyone actually know what that roadmap looks like?

Feels like a month ago Cowork was shipping substantial new features every couple of days. It was kind of exciting. But I haven’t seen much from the Cowork team lately.

Anyone else notice the slowdown? Hoping it’s just a big release cooking.

I have two Substack publications. On both of them, I'm using the embeddable subscribe button on external websites (not hosted on Substack) to drive subscribers.

On one publication, the pop-up overlay shows exactly what I want: the newsletter name, the blurb, and the logo.

On the other, it also displays my byline — and I don't want that. I've gone through every setting I can find on both publications and can't figure out what's different between them, or where to turn the byline off.

Has anyone run into this? Is there a setting I'm missing, or is this tied to something in the publication profile that I haven't found yet?

Any advice on how to remove the byline from the pop-up?

Thanks!

I'm on an old grandfathered T-Mobile plan: 2 Lines ONE Plan All In Promo, paying $110/month (after $10 autopay discount) for two lines. It's been a great deal so I've held onto it, but I'm starting to wonder if I'm missing any benefits from being on a newer plan, or if I'm being deprioritized on the network when in heavy usage areas (like Times Square).

My data usage varies a lot depending on whether I'm commuting and hot spotting but it ranges from ~9 GB to ~33 GB/month.

A few questions for the group:

1. Am I being deprioritized? I know legacy ONE plans have a ~50GB heavy data threshold, but I'm wondering if newer premium plan customers (Go5G Plus, Experience Beyond, etc.) get bumped ahead of me even before I hit that threshold — just by virtue of being on a legacy plan.
2. Is there a meaningful real-world difference in congested NYC environments between my plan and something like Experience Beyond or Experience More?
3. Is the $110/2 lines deal worth protecting? Current comparable plans seem to run significantly more. Is the potential priority difference worth paying more?

I'm not looking to switch just because, but if I'm consistently getting a worse experience in the places I use data most, it might be worth reconsidering.

Anyone with inside knowledge of how QCI/priority is actually assigned to legacy ONE plans vs. current postpaid plans would be especially helpful.

Thanks!

I've been on the Apple Upgrade Program since basically the beginning — maybe 10 years now. When I first signed up, it felt like a straight swap. My carrier bill went down by roughly what I was paying Apple each month. It made sense.

Fast forward to now and I'm trying to figure out if it still makes sense. I'm on a very old grandfathered T-Mobile plan and I'm starting to notice some throttling, so I've been shopping around. What I'm finding is that carriers basically don't reward you for bringing your own device anymore. Verizon's BYOD discount is like $10/month per line. The pricing assumes you're going to finance a phone through them.

When I first joined the AUP, carriers seemed to genuinely price in the fact that you weren't getting a subsidized phone. Now it feels like they've quietly dropped that.

If you're grandfathered into an old plan like I am, the AUP might still pencil out because your base rate is low enough that you're still roughly splitting the cost. But if you're on a current plan at current prices, I'm not sure the math works anymore.

Am I missing something? Has anyone else gone through this calculation recently? Curious whether people think the AUP is still worth it or whether it made more sense a decade ago.

Thanks!