u/FelixLahaie

Hey everyone,

We're making a narrative campaign for 0 A.D. (open source historical RTS, like Age of Empires).

Looking for an illustrator for a few intro scenes. Volunteer, full credit. Great for a portfolio.

Let me know if you're interested!

https://preview.redd.it/fcwufyuzgqnh1.png?width=1000&format=png&auto=webp&s=4c62dc5178d025431dd0226e7b422bc28a4d60bd

https://wildfiregames.com/forum/topic/168855-campaign-idea-with-the-iberians-%E2%80%93-looking-for-feedback-and-editor-tips/page/2/#comment-761214

Thanks

Hey everyone!

I'm starting a devlog every two weeks for Burning Heart (An original Campaign about Viriathus and his fight against Rome.)

https://wildfiregames.com/forum/topic/168855-campaign-idea-with-the-iberians-%E2%80%93-looking-for-feedback-and-editor-tips/page/2/#comment-761220

Where we're at right now:

• History fully researched (Appian + modern sources)
• 5 scenarios designed, each with its own vibe
• Draft maps for each one
• Voiceover planned for the intro
• 8 people helping so far
• Getting the project structure ready before diving into Atlas

What I'm looking for right now:
🎨 An illustrator for key scenes/artwork

Volunteer work, full credit given. Updates every two weeks!

Thanks!

Tests with Atlas

I've been noticing some quirks with the default AI (RCA) : games feeling a bit flat, easy to manipulate/exploit its behavior, passivity in certain terrain, hesitation to engage. Curious to hear from everyone who's played against the bots in general.

• What do you like about how RCA plays?
• What frustrates you or feels off?
• Anything you wish it did differently, or how would you improve it?

Trying to collect experiences and think through some possible improvement angles!

It's August 2026.

Van Rossem is live.

Leios is in testnet.

Lace supports Bitcoin and Midnight.

Technically, Cardano is impressive.

But honestly?

I'm tired of waiting for Cardano to become useful.

We're constantly talking about DeFi, scalability, governance, adoption, TVL, and the next big project.

But sometimes I look at Cardano and think:

Where are the little things?

Where are the people who simply create things?

A book.

A game.

A map.

A translation.

A tutorial.

A community.

A piece of art.

Something simple that makes someone happy.

So I'm starting small.

I wrote a book about my rabbit destroying my things.

Moka Lahaie.

And I want to publish it through the Cardano ecosystem.

Not because it's going to transform DeFi.

Not because it's going to increase TVL.

Not because I need to create a token around it.

I just created something.

And I'm proud of it.

I have the work I created. I can look at it and say:

I made this.

And maybe one day, someone using the Cardano ecosystem will discover it.

Maybe a parent.

Maybe a teacher.

Maybe someone working in a school.

Maybe they'll think it's funny.

Maybe they'll share it with a class.

And maybe some kid will read my book and laugh at my stupid rabbit.

That's it.

But honestly?

I think that's valuable.

I already contribute this way to other projects.

I contribute to 0 A.D.

I contribute to The Battle for Wesnoth.

Sometimes I create things.

Sometimes I suggest ideas.

Sometimes I help with something simply because I care about the project.

I don't need a token to motivate me.

I contribute because I like being part of something.

Two brain tumors changed the way I think about time.

I realized I don't have forever to wait.

And it made me ask:

Why couldn't Cardano work like this?

Why should contributing to Cardano necessarily mean:

• building a DApp
• launching a token
• starting a company
• becoming a developer
• raising money
• creating the next billion-dollar project

What if I could simply contribute?

Imagine:

Someone creates a scenario for a game.

Someone translates an open-source project.

Someone creates illustrations.

Someone writes documentation.

Someone publishes a book.

Someone creates a comic.

Someone makes a tutorial.

Someone organizes a local community.

Someone helps a beginner.

Someone creates something that makes another person happy.

These things are small.

But they're real.

And what if, one day, my Cardano wallet could reflect some of that?

Not just:

"This person owns ADA."

But:

"This person contributes."

That's what I'd like to see with Lace.

A wallet that's more than money.

A place where I can discover projects, support creators, participate in communities, and see the things I'm contributing to.

Because I think we're always thinking too big.

"How do we reach 100 million users?"

Maybe that's the wrong question.

Let's start with one.

Then ten.

Then one hundred.

Imagine 10,000 people each creating something small.

One creates a map.

One writes a guide.

One publishes a comic.

One translates something.

One creates a game.

One contributes to open source.

One starts a local community.

One writes a book.

One helps a child learn something.

None of these things will make headlines.

But put 10,000 of them together.

Now you have something alive.

I don't want Cardano to become a place where everyone just waits for the next big project.

And I don't want Cardano to be only a place where people wait for their wallets to become more valuable.

I want it to be a place where people can say:

"I made something too."

Maybe that's where adoption actually starts.

Not with 100 million people.

Not with the next billion-dollar project.

Maybe it starts with one person.

Creating one thing.

Sharing it.

And maybe, somewhere, a kid discovers it and smiles.

That's why I'm starting with Moka Lahaie.

That's it !

Hey everyone,

This is a mini project of mine - my first real attempt at building a full multiplayer map for Wesnoth. I was looking for a big multiplayer map to play on, couldn't quite find what I wanted, so I decided to build my own: Aleris, an 8-player map built around a symmetric octagonal layout with a King of the Hill twist at the center.

Instead of a ninth keep, the center holds a temple, reachable by 5 bridges from different directions. Whoever pushes in and holds it gets a strong economic and positional edge, but sits exposed to every other player at once. It turns the mid-game into a real risk/reward call - push early and hold the advantage, or stay back and let someone else take the exposure. Designing that part was honestly my favorite bit of the whole project.

I've been testing it in local games against AI to check pacing and balance. One of the best games so far was a 3v2v2v1 free-for-all: 3 loyalist AI vs 2 drake AI vs 2 orc AI vs me. Lots of action, constant map pressure from every direction, and the center point ended up changing hands twice before the match settled - exactly the kind of back-and-forth I was hoping for.

A little personal note: I'm currently dealing with two brain tumors, so my energy and time are limited. But Wesnoth has been a game I truly love, and creating this map was a way for me to stay engaged, to focus on something positive, and to contribute a little something back to this community in my own way. It's not perfect, but it's mine, and I had a lot of fun making it.

Map details:

• 108x109 hexes, built for big FFA or team games (not 1v1)
• Distinct biomes per starting region (snow, desert/hills, tropical wetlands, temperate grassland) so each start feels different
• 97 villages spread across the map
• GPL v2 licensed

Repo with the map file and README:
https://github.com/lilypoppybooks/Aleris_The_Battle_of_Westnoth.git

Would love feedback, especially on village balance for the outer starting positions. Still learning, so any critique is welcome.

Aleris.map

​

I keep seeing people say ADA is dead because the price isn't moving. But here's why I think that's a shallow take:

1. Decentralization matters

Yes, the governance has been messy. But a project can have bad governance and still be very much alive.

2. Open source = second chances

Open source projects don't die easily. Look at Blender – it was "dead" for years, now it's the industry standard. Cardano's code is still there. Slow doesn't mean dead.

3. Media noise vs reality

If you only watch the price, yeah, it looks dead. But if you look at what's being built (DeFi, stablecoins, sidechains).

Do you judge a blockchain by its price or by its development activity and tech?