u/Fine_Cake4106

Why should anyone use the new "AI Assisted Editor"? The idea from Adobe's ads: quickly brush over something to change a jacket color or swap hair color in seconds. But has anyone actually made this work? For me, it fails completely.

Instead of changing the hair color, the AI completely changes the hair texture and hairstyle. In my case, it even generated a totally different person with different eyes and a different nose! I asked for dark ash blonde, and it gave me a stranger with random curls.

Using the brush tool makes it even worse. If you Google it, everyone says the AI keeps your original hair texture and contours. That is just a lie. It just pastes a random AI wig over your photo.

It feels like going 3 years back in time. Why advertise a quick color swap if it just creates a whole new human being?

Has anyone actually gotten this to work? This would be only reason for me to use it: quickly change the colour.

I’ve been testing something out and wanted to see if anyone else has noticed this.

I’m currently paying for Gemini Pro (cause its included in Google Drive storage) but I've noticed that when I use the built-in AI chat, the free embedded version in Chrome, the experience is actually way better.

The chat is really fast, snappy, and gets to the point without any useless filler text. paid Gemini pro app feels like it's missing stuff, takes longer to respond, and often gives unnecessarily long answers for simple questions. And I don't know how often I have been telling it "thats not true" and then get the "oh sorry i made a mistake" stuff. I am not talking about coding things.

Has anyone else noticed this? It feels weird that the free/embedded version provides a much better and faster user experience than the premium app I’m actually paying for. What models are they even running under the hood to cause such a massive difference in speed and conciseness?