u/Free_Comment_3958

Karen Read and Turtleboy Motions to Dismiss Denied! Trial Lawyer Breaks it Down! - YouTube

Not a big surprise here as this was expected. It'll be interesting to see what they write and what cases they cite for their appeal. I look forward to Pyle's motion as he seems to be really on the ball about 1st amendment caselaw.

Edit - Le Sigh... too early in morning for me. SLAPP not SLAAP. Though I would like to see some people in this case get SLAAPed.

By charging the cop that recorded his colleague with felony wiretapping charges with up to 13 years in jail.

https://ktla.com/news/local-news/cop-faces-13-years-in-prison-for-secretly-recording-sexist-homophobic-and-racist-remarks-allegedly-made-by-fellow-lapd-officers-das-office-says/

Here’s the one “good” cop and the DA wants to make an example out of him for violating two party consent laws.

The officer, 43-year-old Daniel Flores, allegedly taped portions of conversations while he was assigned to a unit that performed background investigations into candidates seeking jobs with the LAPD. The recordings were taped secretly without the permission of his fellow officers, Los Angeles County District Attorney Nathan Hochman said.
“This case serves as a warning to anyone seeking to record a conversation without the other person’s permission that doing so is illegal and has been a crime in the state of California for over 50 years,” Hochman said. “It doesn’t matter where you work or who you are – a neighbor, a coworker or, in this case, a police officer. Your right to privacy in a confidential conversation is protected, no matter who is doing the recording or, with few exceptions, why they are doing the recording. For those illegal eavesdroppers, please know that my office will prosecute them for their actions surreptitiously recording others.”

…

“We deplore the sexist, homophobic and racist remarks made by certain LAPD employees, and they should be held accountable for such statements,” Hochman said. “However, in our all-party consent state, where California has been one of the nation’s leaders in protecting privacy and deterring illegal eavesdropping for over half a century, one cannot simply choose to break the law because one wants to pursue a personal agenda. The options are [to] not break the law or do nothing. One can address important issues by going through the proper legal channels. If one chooses a law-breaking path instead, then the consequences will be straightforward and significant.”

I would kill for an evidentiary hearing in anything to do with Karen/Aidan cases. Mainly because we can see how badly it has and is going for Lally in Myles King to the point they took a year long hiatus in the middle of it.

Turtleboy Motion to Dismiss BA and BH Defamation Claims! Trial Lawyer Breaks it Down!

Main point being Albert and Higgins don't belong in this lawsuit in regards to Aidan as they were both Public Officials and this means Actual Malice is necessary. Plaintiffs have done nothing to plead actual malice in regards to Aidan and those two.

LIVE Doubleheader: Myles King & Karen Read Hearings Back to Back in Norfolk

Holy shit. He really went there.

This is getting kind of absurd as now Proctor's lawyers have raised a new reason as to why it with Aidan's post about Proctor having a "nervous" breakdown.

Maybe the judge will finally recognize some of the games being played.

He apparently has some questions about responses to emails from Attorney Murphy (I believe he is a house defendant lawyer).

Why the judge is micromanaging communications at this level? No idea.

I will note we have yet to see this judge ever order House Defendant lawyers (or 3rd party lawyers) to give affidavits as to how shenanigans happened with them around Depositions (missing, shifting excuses) or hallucinated cases (Tully) or Proctor's lawyer continuing to blame people for stuff without evidence.

It’s an excuse. Not a good one, but it’s an excuse.

He’s doing a lot of editorializing for his “just give me the facts” stance.