I’m a Barbie girl, in a Barbie world
I think we are all asking the wrong question here.
Dean himself called what happened a “deliberate deception”, conduct contrary to the honesty, integrity, and honor expected of future members of the legal profession. If reports are true that this was not an isolated incident but a repeated pattern, then the question goes beyond what she did. The question becomes: Are the consequences truly commensurate with the gravity and repetition of the offense?
A one-week suspension and automatic failure may be a penalty, but if someone has repeatedly committed the same kind of misconduct, one cannot help but ask whether it is enough to deter the very behavior the school says it refuses to tolerate.
And perhaps the most uncomfortable question of all: Would the outcome have been exactly the same if she were simply an ordinary law student with no money, influence, political position, or powerful name behind her?
Because a law school cannot teach us that justice is blind while leaving its students wondering whether the scales somehow become lighter depending on who is standing before them. If integrity is the standard, then consistency must be part of it.