Should I accept an offer even though I'm expecting a better offer within a month?
hey all, this is a bit of an add-on to my last post
I'm currently unemployed (new grad-ish) and I have an offer in SF. But I'm loathing the idea of moving to SF. The rental market looks awful and every unit I find looks dilapidated and overpriced, not to mention a very aging population. I feel like I'd be super bored and depressed there.
I'm expecting another offer elsewhere (need background check to clear) - they've given me the verbal offer but not a piece of paper yet, and I've heard that they occasionally rescind verbal offers from time-to-time. That other offer is in a COL that is much cheaper and a nicer city imo.
I'm wondering if it is ethical/acceptable for me to accept the SF offer I actually have (and work there for maybe a month or two) and also accept the other offer, and set a deferred start date. If I like SF, I'll stay with that job. But if I hate it, I'll be able to move away in like two months.
Thoughts? Is this crazy and evil?