u/Hamdi_bks

I started working for a client 6 weeks ago. He has no technical background, but he has an idea for an AI-based product.
When we first discussed it, he asked for a timeline. I said an MVP would take 2–3 weeks, and the full product around 2 months, possibly more.
He wasn’t satisfied with that and said, “But I have a friend who used Claude and built this website in one week.”
I use Claude too, but his idea is much more complex. So I explained the situation to him, and he agreed.
During the first two weeks, I managed to get him something he could actually use and test. Every time he used it, he would send me a Loom video explaining how the agent was wrong here, how it should have said this, shouldn’t have said that, should have known X and Y, etc.
I explained that this was just the beginning and that I was iterating on it, and it was getting better every day.
However, the client’s negative feedback never stopped. Even when an issue was addressed and solved, he would never acknowledge it. He would just focus on another problem, another piece.
At this point, the pattern of only negative feedback is kind of frustrating, but I also get it. It’s early development, and these kinds of issues are expected with any product. Things don’t work perfectly on the first try, and many refinement iterations are needed.
Which, of course, I was doing every day. I was also testing everything myself to make sure it worked.
However, his feedback started becoming less concrete. Things like “it’s dumb,” “it’s not connecting the pieces,” “it’s not doing things right.”
One time he wrote me a message that had the word “confused” three times. In that same message, nothing concrete was actually written. Nothing I could verify, reproduce, or look into.
There is an existing competitor that he uses as a benchmark for what he wants us to build. That product took a team of 3 people around 14 months to build. I explained to him that he’s comparing what I’m building solo in a few weeks to a product that had multiple people working on it for over a year.
But his rationale is basically that with Claude, you can build anything very fast and bug-free. I don’t know what demo videos he saw on LinkedIn, but he’s convinced this is today’s reality.
He’s not even happy with that competitor’s app and wants what we’re building to be even better.
He’s paying me $25/hour, expecting this in under two months, and I’m working solo on it.
This past week, which was my 6th week, I was basically done adding features and focused on fixing bugs, refining things, and fully testing everything.
I wish I could give more details about the amount of work done and the capabilities the agent already has, but I want to stay anonymous for the moment. What I can say is that I’m sure what I’m doing is not just “vibe coding.” It’s truly useful, and when I tested mine against the competitor’s agent, they honestly weren’t too far off.
Anyway, this past week he didn’t even test it, and today he sent me a message saying he’s really frustrated, has spent $6k with “nothing to show for it,” and that this is not okay.
I also found out that he lowered my weekly hours limit from 40 hours to just 10 without saying anything to me.
Sorry this was long. It was partly a rant, but I’m also genuinely asking for advice. I’m afraid of getting a bad review. What should my next moves be?
PS: He also came up with another idea during week 3, hired someone else to work on it, and I’m now managing that person too: reviewing his work, giving him tasks, etc. So that’s another responsibility/dependency on top of the original work.
He also said the new hire “feels slow” (lol, he’s not).
And during those 6 weeks, he hired 2 executive assistants and both were fired. I feel like that shows how demanding and constantly unsatisfied he is and how difficult it can be to meet his expectations.

I make short educational/math videos, and sometimes I get comments like “sounds AI to me” or “AI slop.”

I’m not really sure what the best move is. Should I leave those comments because they create engagement, even if the engagement is negative? Or should I remove them/hide the user so the comment section doesn’t turn into a place where new viewers immediately assume the content is low quality?

I don’t mind criticism if it’s specific, but comments like “AI slop” don’t really give me anything to improve. At the same time, I wonder if deleting them will impact the algorithm negatively or reduce engagement on the video.