u/Honest-Word-7890

I'm generally satisfied with covers, sometimes they bugs out, and this ain't good, but I find them targeted on the specific song and useful. Anyway:

1. I would like them to be in higher resolution *within* the MP3 file, like 1024x1024, hopefully not breaking anything.

2. I would like to be able to redo them by wasting a tiny amount of credits when it bugs out (like 1 credit per complete redone generation?)

3. Sometimes they lack contrast. A contrast check and auto-fix passage should be added to the cover generation workflow.

I'm pretty happy with Suno, but there is always the chance to improve it. I would eventually expand this post later.

[UPDATE] MP3 have been restored, problem solved. Rejoice.

It was all easy peasy with MP3 and now tags are f* up with M4A. Are we going downhill? (me) Paying user.

I can't extract anymore covers with Mp3tag. What the... Suno!

Please, help, covers are no more, and my workflow has been interrupted.

I mean, at least for those who pays...

So, curators and platforms are beginning labelling songs made with or by AI. We already know that only slop gets done with a click, and that an actual good song need effort even using tools like this one, still everyone is impatient as labelling our work this way or the other. Now, how to protect our work and our rights? Should we expose to all the perils or hide what tools we use and how we make our songs completely, because I foresee discrimination is next, or maybe it's already here (with curators?). Sone platform are already giving out multiple options like 'AI assisted' AND 'made with tools like Suno', like if the latter would be even worse. How to tackle this? Trying to hide or not, and where, just with curators or also platforms?

View Poll