u/Illustrious_Low1903

I keep coming back to VWAP because it's the only intraday level where I actually trust why price reacts the way it does. Along with that I’m also looking for a failed reclaim: price approaches from below, attempts to move through the VWAP area, and then closes back below it.

I’ve shared some images from my Vanquish options eval account. My focus is to build a process I can carry into a funded account without changing the setup as the account stage changes.

For this VWAP rejection setup, I wanted:

• A relatively clean approach from below
• A push into the upper VWAP band
• A clear rejection candle closing back below the band
• Enough space between the entry and the next support level
• An obvious invalidation point above the rejection

The important part wasn’t that price touched VWAP. It was how price behaved after attempting to reclaim it.

The entry

I don't buy the first touch of VWAP. Too many of those are just noise, price tags the level and keeps going. What I want is a clean push into the band, a stall, and a rejection candle that closes back below it with some conviction not a doji, not a weak wick.

That's what happened here. Price pushed into the VWAP band, printed a rejection, closed back under it. I bought 17 SPY 768 puts right on that candle close. No retest wait on this one, the rejection was clean enough and the band had already held once earlier in that same push, so I didn't need extra confirmation.

The stop and target

Price didn't mess around. Rolled over almost immediately, and VWAP flipped from being a ceiling it was trying to break to a ceiling it respected on the way down no real bounce attempts worth mentioning. That's usually a good sign the rejection was real and not a one-candle fakeout.

Booked profits at 768.29, where the prior support shelf was sitting. Stop was tight, just above the rejection wick. Worked out to roughly 1:3.

If price had chopped through that VWAP band three or four times before this push, I wouldn't have taken it. A level that's been tagged repeatedly in the same session loses meaning everyone watching it stops reacting the same way. This worked because it was one clean approach, one clean rejection, not the fifth attempt of the day.

Also skip this near the close. VWAP compresses toward price late in the session and rejections stop meaning what they mean at 10 or 11 AM.

Risk management

Stop goes above the level, not above the entry candle. If VWAP gets reclaimed for real, the thesis is dead and I'm out no reason to give it extra room hoping it comes back.

Target was structure, not a fixed R multiple. The prior support shelf was sitting right there, so I took it instead of holding for more.

For anyone else trading VWAP on an eval or funded account: do you enter on the rejection close, or wait for a retest?

Winning trades feel obvious in hindsight. I entered, price moved, and I exited. But a green P&L does not always mean the execution was good.

Losing trades usually leave more useful evidence. The entry I rushed, the stop I placed poorly, the rule I bent, or the revenge trade I took because I wanted to recover the previous loss.

That is why I screenshot and record my losing trades. Because later it gives me an honest record of what I actually did instead of what I later remember doing.

Take this trade for example [check the image]. I entered after the bullish crossover of the 9 and 21 EMA. Chart annotation says it entered right there early. Price hadn't actually pulled back clean to the 21. It was close. Close enough that in the moment it felt fine. Clicked anyway.

In this case, the crossover provided bullish context, but I treated it as though continuation had to happen immediately. I did not leave enough room for a normal pullback before the next move higher.

Without reviewing the chart, I might have recorded this as a setup that failed. Looking at the chart afterward showed me that the broader idea worked, but my entry and stop placement did not work together.

Why winning screenshots don't teach the same thing

A green trade reinforces whatever you did. Doesn't matter if the process was sloppy. P&L was positive so the brain files it as correct.

Losing screenshots force the question. What specifically went wrong. Was it the entry, the exit, the size, the timing, the emotional state going in.

Most of the time it's one tiny thing. Same thing repeating across 10 different losing screenshots. That pattern is invisible until you're looking at all of them together.

This becomes even more important when trading an eval account or funded account. You can read the direction correctly and still create unnecessary drawdown through poor timing, position sizing, or stop placement.

Do you review your losing trades or just move on to the next session?

tsla chart above.

price eventually hit the target, but it took almost an hour of grinding with very little momentum. i skipped it.

it failed two checks from my entry criteria: volume expansion and a convincing confirmation candle.

the breakout looked fine initially

price pushed off the base, emas started stacking, and the structure suggested continuation. on a quick glance, it looked like a clean break.

but for my setup, breaking a level isn't enough.

i want to see:

• volume expanding as price clears the level
• a strong-bodied candle showing acceptance above resistance
• immediate follow-through after the breakout

this had none of that.

no confirmation candle, no trade

i was looking for a bullish engulfing candle or at least a strong candle closing decisively above the breakout zone.

instead, price just drifted higher with small bodies and no real expansion. to me, that's usually buyers participating, but not with much urgency.

it's not that every winning breakout needs an engulfing candle. it's simply one of the filters i use to avoid low-conviction setups.

low volume usually means low conviction

a breakout without volume behind it doesn't tell me much. can it still work? absolutely.

but on 0dte, i don't care about "eventually." i care about momentum.

this move took almost an hour to reach target. that's an hour of theta working against the position while waiting for the trade to prove itself.

0dte rewards speed

when i'm trading 0dte contracts, i want to see the move develop quickly. if the setup is good, i expect expansion shortly after entry.

the underlying eventually did what it was supposed to do, but depending on the strike, delta, and iv, the options pnl could have looked completely different.

i'd rather miss ten slow grinders like this and catch the one that breaks with volume, acceptance, and immediate follow-through.

how everyone else approaches these setups.

do you wait for volume confirmation, or are you comfortable entering on structure alone?

sorry for the long post lol

Not going to pretend it was one perfect strategy firing all week. It wasn't. Different days had different conditions, different volatility, and different setups. That was actually the main lesson.

$631. $248. $563. $634. $395. 

Five green sessions in a row, none of them traded exactly the same way.

The biggest change was paying attention to volatility before choosing the strategy.

On the high-IV day, I sold credit spreads. Premium was expensive, theta was doing the work, and I didn't need a massive move to make money. I just needed a price to avoid completely blowing through the position.

For choppy sessions, iron condors made more sense. If the market was grinding sideways and nothing was breaking cleanly, forcing a directional trade felt like guessing. Selling both sides gave me a better way to trade the condition instead of fighting it.

The other rule was spread width. 

For verticals, I kept it to one strike wide.

Wider spreads can feel safer because the range is bigger, but they also increase the amount you can lose if you are wrong. In an options eval account, keeping max loss small matters more than chasing a bigger potential payout.

That is probably why the week worked.

I did not try to make every day look the same. I checked the market condition, looked at IV, picked the right took, and kept position size controlled. 

That matters even more when you are trying to pass an eval account and eventually trade a funded account. 

Look I kept my goal simple - stay inside drawdown, protect consistency, and avoid one bad trade wiping out the week.

Are you adjusting your options strategy based on IV, or going with the same setup daily?

Most 0DTE traders focus on direction. Which way is SPY going. Calls or puts? Entry level? 

But the amount of time remaining on the contract matters just as much, especially when trading inside an options eval account. Take the same Friday expiring SPY contract.

On Monday, it has roughly four days until expiration. By Friday, that same contract becomes -DTE. Same strike and expiration, but a completely different amount of time left for the trade to work. 

That is the real Monday vs Friday theta comparison.

What is theta

Theta is time decay. Every option contract loses value as time passes even if the price doesn't move against you. On a 0DTE contract this happens faster than any other expiration because the clock runs out the same day.

But not all days decay equally. And that difference is what I found out the hard way.

Monday the slow bleed for me

Buy a 0DTE call on Monday morning, SPY sits flat for two hours you're losing premium, but slowly. Theta is working against you but it's manageable. You still have time for the move to happen.

That's the blue line in the chart. Gradual, steady decay throughout the day. Painful if SPY doesn't move, but not instantly fatal. You have a window to be right.

This is why Monday gives you more room to breathe on 0DTE. The premium doesn't disappear immediately. If your setup is right and the move comes even mid morning you still capture real value.

Monday is where you learn. More time, more forgiveness, more room to let a trade develop without theta eating you alive while you wait.

Friday the cliff

Same setup on Friday? Completely different experience.

Friday 0DTE theta is aggressive from the open. Every minute that passes without a move in your direction is costing you significantly more than it would on any other day. Why? Because Friday contracts expire at 4pm there's no tomorrow. Market makers know this and price it in from the start.

That red line in the chart isn't gradual. It holds okay through midday then absolutely falls off a cliff into close. By 2pm your premium is getting destroyed. By 3pm you're watching your option lose value in real time even if SPY is barely moving against you.

That's not bad luck. That's just Friday theta doing exactly what it always does.

What this means in an options eval account

Just wanted to point out that - The chart is a simplified example of how I manage time risk, not a literal pricing model or backtest. Actual option premium also depends on SPY’s movement, strike selection, implied volatility and entry time. 

On Monday, the blue line represents the extra patience I may give a valid setup when I enter early and the trade thesis is still intact. I am not assuming theta will be harmless, but I may allow the position slightly more time to develop instead of expecting an immediate move. 

On Friday, the red line represents the risk of holding a 0DTE position later into the session. As expiration approaches, there is less time for the expected move to happen, and any remaining extrinsic value must eventually disappear. Holding a stalled Friday 0DTE trade into 2-3 pm leaves very little time for the position to recover. 

This matters in an eval account because the evaluation rules do not change how theta works, but a slow premium loss can still consume part of the account’s available drawdown. The same risk remains after passing the evaluation and moving to a funded account.

Friday isn't untradeable. But the margin for error is razor thin for me. 

The simple rule

Blue line: more patience only while the setup remains valid. More time is not permission to enter carelessly or keep adding to a losing position. 

Red line: tighter time stop and no holding into the afternoon solely because the option might recover.

Same contract. Same ticker. Completely different clock running against you depending on which day you're sitting down to trade.

Look at that chart one more time before your next Friday trade. It'll save you from holding "just a little longer" at least once.

Which day do you find easiest to trade 0DTE and have you noticed the theta difference yourself?

 Old trade, but still one of the clearest lessons I’ve had from trading 0DTE options. 

I’m sharing it because the chart and P&L explain the mistake better than I can. 

I had a bullish read on SPY and bought 737 calls at the 9/21 EMA. This was a 0DTE trade with an initial position of around 10 contracts. 

The setup looked all right going in and I kept my invalidation level at 733. 

SPY started dropping. Instead of exiting at 733, I told myself it would bounce from the 50 EMA. I added roughly 7 more contracts to lower my cost basis. SPY continued dropping. I avg down again, and ended up with a bloated position in a trade that was already showing me the original idea was wrong from the first red candle.

Look at the chart. That big drop after entry wasn’t just a small dip. It was SPY breaking the level I had planned to use as my exit. That 50 EMA didn't hold. Position just kept bleeding.

For transparency, this trade was taken in Vanquish evaluation account. It became a useful lesson in how quickly ignoring one stop can affect the rest of a trading session. 

The P&L tells the rest:

-$445.50 - That's where the original exit should've been. Small loss, manageable.

Then -$1,514.80 - The loss after ignoring the original stop and averaging down twice.

Same day. Same thesis. Just more contracts attached to a losing idea each time.

Why averaging down felt logical

10 contracts at entry. SPY drops. Add seven more at a cheaper premium. The cost basis goes down, so it feels like the trade needs a smaller recovery to break even. 

I went from 10 contracts to roughly 17 contracts on a 0DTE SPY call with theta running every minute. Cost basis is lower but total risk is almost double the original. And SPY needs to move significantly back in the right direction before expiry which is today to make any of it work.

What the 733 stop was supposed to do

733 was the line where the trade was wrong. 

I didn't honor it. SPY broke 733 and instead of closing I added. Turned a pre-planned small loss into a session that genuinely hurt the eval.

My rule is simple now, the original position size is the maximum position size. 

If I enter with 10 contracts, I don’t turn it into 17 because the premium is cheaper. If my strategy is invalidated, I exit. 

No adding. No “one more entry”. No lowering the cost basis after the setup has failed. 

With 0DTE, there is very little time to recover from a mistake. The clock is running from the moment you enter. Every wrong decision costs more than it would on any other instrument.

-$445 was the lesson. -$1,514.80 was the cost of refusing to take it.

Have you ever turned a manageable loss into a much larger one by averaging down?

Monday, SPY was moving strong from the open. Volume was actually there, not the fake open volume that disappears in 3 minutes. I waited about 10 minutes just to confirm it wasn't noise.

It wasn't.

What I was looking at all three EMAs were bullish. 9 above the 21, 21 above the 50, all sloping up clean. That alignment doesn't happen every day. When it does, you don't overthink it, you just wait for the price to pull back into the zone and give you an entry.

That's exactly what happened. SPY pulled back, held above the EMAs, and didn't break structure. Entered there.

Then started adding slowly as it confirmed. Not because I was greedy because each add had a reason. Price held, EMAs stayed stacked, volume backed it up. Position built itself almost.

Booked it when it felt right. No specific target, just read the move and got out. Good thing too because SPY dumped hard right after. If I held 15 more minutes and that $2.4k trade becomes a "why didn't I just take the money" story.

I’m doing this inside a Vanquish's funded options eval, where the rules include a 5% drawdown limit and a 30% consistency rule. One greedy hold and that selloff doesn't just kill the trade it kills the account. So yeah, glad I got out when I did.

The EMA confluence is something I keep coming back to. People overcomplicate entries. When all three are aligned and price gives you a clean pullback that's the whole setup. That's it. Everything else is just noise you're adding because sitting on your hands feels uncomfortable.

What actually helps is not going full size on the first entry. I start with half, see if the trade confirms price holds, EMAs stay stacked, no weird wicks then add the rest. Keep the risk down on the initial entry and if it doesn't confirm you're not fully committed to a bad trade.

Same logic with exits. I don't wait for one perfect moment to close everything. Book part of it when it's up decent, let the rest ride. Worst case the trade reverses and you are still locked in something. Best case the runner keeps going and you didn't leave empty handed trying to time the top perfectly

Still working on making this consistent. But Monday felt like proof the setup actually works when you let it.

A few days back, I had one of those sessions where everything looked paper perfect. Clean breakout, good momentum, entries worked, exits were decent, and by late morning I was up way more than I expected.

Normally, that should feel like a great day right?

But in a funded/eval account, a big green day can create a different problem. This is where the consistency rule comes in. 

A/c to the consistency rule, “no single day should be more than 30% of your total profits”. Simple enough on paper! But when the market is moving perfectly in your direction, especially on a volatile day, it's genuinely hard to stop yourself from letting that one session carry the whole account.

That’s why I had to stop looking at the consistency rule as some annoying restriction and started treating it like a daily risk limit.

Here’s what helped me stay under it, especially on volatile days.

1. First understand what the rule is actually doing

The way I look at it now is simple. 

The rule is there to make sure your profits are spread across the challenge, not carried by one oversized day.

Because as good as an 8R day feels, if that one day is surrounded by flat or red days, it doesn’t really show consistency. It just shows that one session went really well.

Once I understood that, I stopped resenting the rule and started working with it

2. The math I do before I even open a trade

If my total account profit is sitting at say $1000, I know my daily cap for that day is $300. 

That's the number I write down before the session starts.

This matters because on a volatile day, you can hit that cap in two trades. If I don't know the number going in, I'll keep trading past it without realizing.

3. Volatile days where people mess up

Big VIX days, FOMC, CPI these are the sessions where you can make a week's worth of profit in an hour. And that's exactly the problem.

What I do on high-volatility days:

Smaller size than usual. 

Sounds contradictory because the moves are bigger, but that's the point. I don't need full size to hit my daily cap when SPY is moving 1.5% in 20 minutes.

I set a profit alert at 80% of my daily cap. Not 100% - 80%. That gives me a warning before I'm already over. By the time most people notice they've breached the consistency threshold, it's already done.

Once that alert triggers, I either stop completely or take only one more trade with half size. Usually I just stop. The last 20% isn't worth the risk of overshooting.

The day I learned this the hard way

I had a session where everything looked great. Clean breakout, stack aligned. Made almost 40% of my total profits in a single morning.

Didn't breach any drawdown rule. The account was fine. 

But that one day threw off my consistency ratio for the rest of the challenge. I had to basically tiptoe through the remaining days keeping my profits small just to balance it out. 

What actually keeps me consistent

Treating the daily cap as a hard stop, same as drawdown. 

The moment I gave it the same mental weight as "don't lose more than X"  it became a lot easier to walk away from a good day early.

Some days the market gives you more than you should take. 

I consider those days as a discipline test, not an opportunity.

So how are you guys handling the consistency rule? Share some tips below

When Robert Pattinson was cast as Batman for The Batman, the reaction online was mostly negative. A lot of people couldn’t look past Twilight and dismissed him before even seeing a frame. Reddit threads and Twitter were full of criticism, memes, and doubt.

But once the trailers dropped, opinions slowly started shifting. And after release, that same casting was being praised. His darker, more grounded take on Batman especially the detective side won over both critics and fans.

Now it’s kind of funny to see the complete flip. With Matt Reeves confirming the sequel, Reddit threads are blowing up with theories, and Twitter is full of hype instead of hate. The same people who doubted him are now excited to see what he does next.

Perfect example of how fast the internet switches up once something actually delivers.