Visitor Visa 600 (Family Sponsored) Refused - ART Review Advice Needed
Hi all,
My uncle (Pakistani national) applied for a Subclass 600 Visitor Visa in the Sponsored Family stream. My dad is the Australian sponsor. Application was self-lodged, no migration agent.
Refused under clause 600.211, delegate not satisfied he genuinely intends to stay temporarily. The reasons given were: weak business financials, limited evidence of economic ties to Pakistan, and family members in Pakistan were seen as a potential incentive to overstay rather than return.
What concerns me is that the delegate refused without ever requesting a security bond, which, from my understanding, is something the delegate requests during assessment and not something the sponsor lodges upfront. Not sure if skipping that step is grounds for challenge.
Questions:
- Should the delegate have requested a bond before refusing? Is this challengeable at the ART?
- Has anyone appealed a similar refusal successfully? What evidence made the difference?
- Should we lodge the ART application ourselves to beat the deadline and engage an agent afterwards for the submission?
- Or should we just let the ART deadline slide and file a new application next year or something? Especially since the review is about $3.5k.
Any advice appreciated.