u/Inukamii

This is an idea I thought of a long time ago. Basically, Nausicaa takes place on Earth, after humanity's attempt to rebuild our dying world into something new; free from the failures of our past. Trigun takes place in space after humanity's attempt to find a fresh, new world, where we can start fresh, free from the failures of our past. I imagine Trigun taking place earlier in the timeline, back when humanity still had hope. Maybe the failure of Project SEEDS was a historical event that added to the pessimism which led to the 7 days of fire.

From the two Trigun animes, it isn't very clear whether the plants are artificial lifeforms, aliens, or divine beings (although the reboot seems to lean in the direction of the latter). I never finished the manga, so I don't know if there's a more definitive interpretation there. However, if they are artificial lifeforms, that would fit perfectly with the Nausicaa lore. I'd imagine the ancient industrial civilization would have created some lifeform that can synthesize arbitrary resources. After realizing how hard it is to control the independent plants, they may have been split up into more manageable lifeforms, such as the Master of the Crypt, the God Warrior, and the Master of the Garden.

I don't really see this as that serious of a theory, since "dying world sci-fi" has seen many interpretations over the years, so there's bound to be some overlap.

Since everyone here is creating something from pure imagination, we cannot directly observe what other's worlds actually look like. We must instead see the world interpreted through its creator's artistic medium of choice.

I've seen lots of interesting mediums posted here; from cardboard cutouts, to video-games. However, it seems like 2D digital art is the most common here. For a while I just assumed that's what's most common in people's minds, but then the thought occurred to me: I'm only assuming that.

So tell me: What does your world actually look like?

My motherboard (MSI B450M PRO-M2 MS-7B84) has two different loadline calibration control settings:

1. CPU loadline calibration control, which allows you to select a percentage from 0% to 400%
2. CPU NB loadline calibration control, which allows you to select options labeled Mode [number], where the number is from 0 to 8

Whenever I look up MSI overvolting guides, I only ever see CPU loadline calibration control without the CPU NB loadline calibration control setting below it. I would normally just assume the "NB" version controls the north-bridge Vdroop, and the non-NB one controls the core Vdroop, but that wouldn't make sense if they are measured using different units (mode # vs %). To make things even stranger, every article and video online shows their non-NB setting using a mode number, while mine uses a percentage?

Also, assuming the percentage setting also controls Vdroop, does a lower or higher percentage mean more Vdroop?