Here is the global tablet market share in Q1 2026 as per Omdia:

**Vendor**	**Q1 2026 Market Share**
**Apple**	40.1%
**Samsung**	15.7%
**Huawei**	8.8%
**Lenovo**	8.2%
**Xiaomi**	7.2%
**Others**	20.1%

Source: https://www.statista.com/statistics/214760/10-countries-with-the-largest-number-of-catholics/

https://www.facebook.com/share/v/1GV4AzkQjV/

Ang hirap naman paniwalaan na ang isang bise presidente ay hindi marunong gumamit ng computer. Napaka bare minimum na ng may basic knowledge tayo sa mga computers sa panahon ng digital age... so hindi rin siya marunong mag email, online meeting, at paggawa ng mga documents? 🤦‍♂️

Source: https://www.facebook.com/share/1P5kmeNr6d/

As someone who has a degree in electrical engineering, ngayon ko lang ito nalaman xD. Susubukan kong ipaliwanag ito in layman's terms:

Basically ang ginagawa ng device na ito ay pinuputol nya ang daloy ng kuryente kapag may temporary fault sa isang linya, at susubukan niyang i restore ang daloy ng kuryente kapag nawala na ang temporary fault.

Mga halimbawa ng temporary faults ay kapag may sanga ng kahoy ang napadpad sa linya ng kuryente dahil sa hangin, o di naman kaya ay isang kidlat na nakaka-apekto sa voltage levels sa isang linya.

So ang flow of mechanism ng device na ito ay:

1. May temporary fault sa linya

2. Puputulin ng auto recloser ang kurente sa loob lang ng ilang miliseconds

3. I che-check ng device kung may fault pa ba

4. Kung wala ng fault, i re-restore nya ang daloy ng kuryente after a few milliseconds (ito yung na e-experience na mini brownouts for only a few seconds)

5. Kapag hindi pa rin nawala ang fault, babalik ito sa steps 2-3. Usually may 3 attempts lang ang device na ito upang i restore ang kuryente automatically. Kapag naka 3 attempt na ito at hindi pa rin nawawala ang fault, manual intervention na ang gagawin ng electric distribution company upang ma restore ang kuryente.

Now, imagine wala ang device na ito at kada may temporary faults sa linya ay mas hahaba ang power interruption time dahil manual intervention ang gagawin ng mga linemen.

So ang pinaka concept dito is mapuputol ang daloy ng kuryente kapag may nakaka distorbo ng normal operating conditions ng power lines for safety reasons, at ang purpose ng auto recloser device ay upang mapabilis ang pag restore ng kuryente in some certain situations.

https://www.gwelectric.com/blog/2025/06/17/recloser-fundamentals-understanding-reclosers-on-poles/

So basically, the everyday objects that we see (e.g. buildings, trees, animals, humans) dont have colors as their inherent property. Unlike mass, density, or electrical conductivity, an object can be seen as more than one color depending on the viewer (good example nito ay ang 2015 Viral Dress: Gold and White vs Black and Blue ). In a physical sense, objects can only absorb, reflect, or emit visible light in different wavelengths.

Colors are just our brain's interpretation of the visible light within the electromagnetic spectrum. Considering the range of the visible light is only a tiny fraction of the whole electromagnetic spectrum (which spans theoretically from zero to infinity), it is also fair to say that the number of color combinations are infinite, but other colors may not be visible on the naked eye.

Having said that, the ability of perceiving colors varies according to the condition of the cone cells of our eyes - the one responsible for detecting different ranges of wavelengths roughly associated with red, green, and blue light. So this is why colorblind people exist and why some animals can see colors that humans cannot (and vice versa).

Over the course of human civilization, we effectively gave meaning to colors for survival, for reproduction, and for living life to the fullest.

TL;DR: Colors exist due to the powerful capability of our brain to interpret different wavelengths of visible light.

Read more here:

https://www.britannica.com/science/color

https://www.britannica.com/science/light

https://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/169209/is-there-an-infinite-amount-of-wavelengths-of-light-is-the-em-spectrum-continuo

In May 2000, the ILOVEYOU worm spread across the world and became one of the most damaging cyberattacks ever.

It was created by Onel de Guzman, a 23-year-old student at AMA Computer College in the Philippines. Reports say he made it as part of a rejected thesis about getting free internet access.

The virus was sent as an email attachment called “LOVE-LETTER-FOR-YOU.TXT.vbs” with the subject line “ILOVEYOU.” It looked harmless, but once opened, it could damage files, copy itself, and send itself to other people in the victim’s contact list.

It spread extremely fast, infecting millions of Windows computers within days, including systems used by big companies and government offices. The damage was estimated at $15 billion to $20 billion, mostly from cleanup and lost data.

De Guzman was never formally prosecuted because we did not yet have a law that clearly punished this kind of cybercrime. That loophole helped push the Philippines to pass the E-Commerce Act of 2000 (RA 8792) later that year.

The ILOVEYOU virus is now remembered as a major warning sign for the digital age. De Guzman later said he wanted free internet access, not worldwide damage, but the chaos had already gone global.