u/JLeeIntell

I've been wondering if there is any real way to quantify the quality of AR/VR experiences.

Not just "does it look good", but something more structured like:

-How immersive the environment feels

-Responsiveness / latency

-Quality of interactions(objects, NPCs, physics)

-Spatial accuracy(lighting, scale, geometry)

-Maybe even user engagement or retention

Basically, something like a "score" for how good a virtual world actually is. If something like this existed, it feels like it could unlock a lot - like ranking or even incentivizing people to build better virtual worlds in a more objective way. Does anything like this exist today in research or industry? Or is it still basically unsolved?

I've been wondering if there is any real way to quantify the quality of AR/VR experiences.

Not just "does it look good", but something more structured like:

-How immersive the environment feels

-Responsiveness / latency

-Quality of interactions(objects, NPCs, physics)

-Spatial accuracy(lighting, scale, geometry)

-Maybe even user engagement or retention

Basically, something like a "score" for how good a virtual world actually is. If something like this existed, it feels like it could unlock a lot - like ranking or even incentivizing people to build better virtual worlds in a more objective way. Does anything like this exist today in research or industry? Or is it still basically unsolved?

When you think about TAO and Bittensor, what do you really think alongside?

...

...

Curious what comes to mind for others.