u/JoJo_Dus_Moovys

As per the title, I'm considering moving ecosystems. I just can't decide which.

I currently use a Fuji X-T4, with some adapted Ef glass (including my beloved Sigma 18-35) and a Sigma 16mm 1.4 X-mount.

I've been eyeing up the X-H2s as my new main workhorse, with the X-T4 serving as my B-cam. However, I'm getting more wary of Fuji's focussing capabilities. I'm worried that if I invest in more Fuji glass and stay with them, I'll have buyers remorse. The X-T4 certainly trips up in this dept at times.

For context, I use it in my full time job as an in-house content creator for a construction company (loft/attic boarding), so I would be looking at a hybrid for both RAW still images and decent video. My personal passion outside of work is filmmaking, so I would definitely be looking at a hybrid that's no slouch in this dept. (As much as I'd love to own a dedicated cinema body!)

I've used canons in the past and I quite like them - I like what I've seen/read about the Canon R5C but RF glass looks really expensive. I've historically never really been a fan of Sony (mostly the menus and a rather 'clinical' look), though their newer models do seem to get the best write ups. I've heard good things about the LUMIX S5, but I've never used that ecosystem.

I also flip/flop between sticking with APSC or take the leap to full frame. I love my sigma 18-35, but the benefits of full frame do intrigue me.

Or maybe I'm worrying too much about the X-H2s? It does tick a lot of boxes. Maybe someone out there happily uses it and has no real issues? Fuji do seem to be a good balance between price and features, which is what appealed about the X-T4 in the first place.

What are your experiences/recommendations ecosystem-wise?

Many thanks in advance 🙏

BTW not sure it matters but I'm UK based.

Has anyone else come across this weird phenomenon in work life and personal?

If you mistakenly offer wrong information, big or small, it's automatically labelled as a "lie".

Let's say I worked in a job where I had to give someone some figures and I make a mistake. I've encountered some people who would automatically label this as a lie, even if it were explained that it was a simple error?

Or if someone were to get a time or date wrong, a completely innocent mistake or human error, they might be labelled as some as "lying", when it's simply not the case at all.

(this doesn't reflect what I do btw, it's just an example).

The definition of a lie, according to Google anyway, is a false statement made with the deliberate intent to deceive or mislead someone.

To me that's key - deliberate intent. That would class it as a lie.

To me, when people do write these things off as lies, it comes across as a bit childish.

"Oh sorry, I was mistaken about that."

"So you lied to me?!"

"No I just got it wrong, that's all."

"YOU LIED TO ME!!!"

Has anyone else encountered this weird phenomenon...?