100m for 15 players. Base cost for each position.
2 Gk 4.0m
5 Defs 4.0m
5 Mids 4.5m
3 Fwds 4.5m
Total cost 64m.
So after you fill your team with absolute cheapest players you have just 36m left to spend upgrading players.
So to put that into perspective of you want both Haaland and Bruno it’s going to cost you 18.5m above base price or over half your available budget to upgrade players.
I would appreciate some feedback on my planned ETF portfolio. I am investing in a S&S ISA on Trading 212.
\*\*Portfolio:\*\*
\*\*60% VWRP\*\* (Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF)
\*\*25% CNX1\*\* (iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF)
\*\*15% WLDS\*\* (Global Small Cap ETF)
Time horizon: \*\*32 years\*\*
Im trying to achieve Long-term capital growth
My thinking is VWRP gives me broad global diversification.
CNX1 gives me an additional allocation to the NASDAQ-100, increasing my exposure to large-cap technology and other growth companies that I believe have strong long-term potential.
WLDS provides global small-cap exposure, which I hope will improve diversification since VWRP is mid to high cap and potentially benefit from the long-term small-cap premium.
I know there’s overlap between VWRP and CNX1, but that’s intentional as i believe US tec sector will continue to do well in the long term.
Does this allocation make sense for a 32-year investment horizon?
Are there any risks or blind spots I’m missing?
I’m trying to build a low-cost portfolio that I can stick with for the next three decades or so.
I would appreciate some feedback on my planned ETF portfolio.
**Portfolio:**
**60% VWRP** (Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF)
**25% CNX1** (iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF)
**15% WLDS** (Global Small Cap ETF)
Time horizon: **32 years**
Im trying to achieve Long-term capital growth
My thinking is VWRP gives me broad global diversification.
CNX1 gives me an additional allocation to the NASDAQ-100, increasing my exposure to large-cap technology and other growth companies that I believe have strong long-term potential.
WLDS provides global small-cap exposure, which I hope will improve diversification since VWRP is mid to high cap and potentially benefit from the long-term small-cap premium.
I know there’s overlap between VWRP and CNX1, but that’s intentional as i believe US tec sector will continue to do well in the long term.
Does this allocation make sense for a 32-year investment horizon?
Are there any risks or blind spots I’m missing?
I’m trying to build a low-cost portfolio that I can stick with for the next three decades or so.
I would appreciate some feedback on my planned ETF portfolio.
**Portfolio:**
**60% VWRP** (Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF)
**25% CNX1** (iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF)
**15% WLDS** (Global Small Cap ETF)
Time horizon: **32 years**
Im trying to achieve Long-term capital growth
My thinking is VWRP gives me broad global diversification.
CNX1 gives me an additional allocation to the NASDAQ-100, increasing my exposure to large-cap technology and other growth companies that I believe have strong long-term potential.
WLDS provides global small-cap exposure, which I hope will improve diversification since VWRP is mid to high cap and potentially benefit from the long-term small-cap premium.
I know there’s overlap between VWRP and CNX1, but that’s intentional as i believe US tec sector will continue to do well in the long term.
Does this allocation make sense for a 32-year investment horizon?
Are there any risks or blind spots I’m missing?
I’m trying to build a low cost portfolio that I can stick with for the next three decades or so.
I would appreciate some feedback on my planned ETF portfolio.
Portfolio:
60% VWRP (Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF)
25% CNX1 (iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF)
15% WLDS (Global Small Cap ETF)
Time horizon: 32 years
Im trying to achieve Long-term capital growth
My thinking is VWRP gives me broad global diversification.
CNX1 gives me an additional allocation to the NASDAQ-100, increasing my exposure to large-cap technology and other growth companies that I believe have strong long-term potential.
WLDS provides global small-cap exposure, which I hope will improve diversification since VWRP is mid to high cap and potentially benefit from the long-term small-cap premium.
I know there’s overlap between VWRP and CNX1, but that’s intentional as i believe US tec sector will continue to do well in the long term.
Does this allocation make sense for a 32-year investment horizon?
Are there any risks or blind spots I’m missing?
I’m trying to build a low-cost portfolio that I can stick with for the next three decades or so.
I have wanted to start investing long term for a few years and am finally in a position financially to do so.
Looking at around 30 years until retirement so I want to grow my wealth until then and from what I have read I just need to keep it simple and consistent. Intention is to invest monthly into the following.
VUAG: Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating - 70%
VHYA: Vanguard FTSE All-World High Dividend Yield UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating - 30%
I am from the U.K. and will be investing into an investment ISA.
Any advice or guidance much appreciated.