u/LeanCrafterUK

▲ 292 r/tesco

Tesco Express Think 25 failed — he looked 25+ but was actually under 25 (Bearded Man)

Tesco Think 25 is honestly becoming a joke. On a packed Bank Holiday Monday evening, when staff were already rushed off their feet, they sent in a grown bearded man who looked well over 25 and acted like it was a fair test. That’s why people are annoyed — it doesn’t feel like sensible policy anymore, it feels like a setup to catch staff out and create problems on purpose.

reddit.com
u/LeanCrafterUK — 13 days ago
▲ 0 r/tesco

If they look under 25, you check ID. If there’s doubt, you check ID.

That part is fine.

What makes it frustrating in a Tesco Express store is everything else you’re expected to juggle at the same time: watching multiple self-checkouts and tills, keeping an eye out for theft, dealing with customers who don’t scan all their items, approving age-restricted products on self-checkouts, and still trying to stay on top of health & beauty stock.

So when Think 25 comes up, it doesn’t feel like one simple check — it feels like one more pressure point in a job that’s already running at full tilt.

That’s the part people outside retail never really see.

reddit.com
u/LeanCrafterUK — 16 days ago

I spent months doing the “right” things.

Calories tracked.

Protein high.

Training consistent.

No excuses.

And still, it felt like I was fighting my own body every single day.

Hunger was always there.

Food noise never shut up.

Every meal felt like a decision, not a break.

That’s why the Reta conversation is different.

Not because it’s some magic shortcut.

Because for a lot of people, it changes the entire experience of losing fat.

The obsession drops.

The constant cravings quiet down.

You stop thinking about food every 20 minutes.

And that changes everything.

Because the hardest part of dieting usually isn’t the workout.

It’s not even the meal plan.

It’s the mental war.

The crazy part is how much better progress feels when your head isn’t screaming for food the entire time.

That’s the real dopamine hit:

not “I suffered again today,”

but “I can actually keep this up.”

For people in this space, that difference is huge.

What hit you harder:

the misery of long-term dieting,

or the first time you realized food noise actually went quiet?

u/LeanCrafterUK — 20 days ago

[Log] Retatrutide dosing error: Massive metabolic crisis. (Harm reduction)

I’m putting this out there because the "more is better" ego in this community is going to put someone in the ICU. I recently made a catastrophic error in my titration for Reta. I calculated the dose wrong and ended up injecting a multi-dose stack—roughly 8x the therapeutic threshold.

I thought I could push the cut. I was wrong. The video attached is a raw look at what happens when you hit the physiological wall on these GLP-1s. It’s not "feeling a little sick." It’s an acute metabolic and gastrointestinal crisis that brings your body to the brink.

The reality:

Within an hour, I hit intractable nausea and violent, non-stop vomiting that lasted nearly 24 hours. My system effectively went into survival mode. I suffered a syncopal episode (fainting) from the rapid fluid loss, acute electrolyte imbalance, and a massive blood pressure crash. There is no "antidote." It’s just supportive care, IV fluids, and praying your body can clear the peptide before you go into shock.

I’m sharing this because there is a dangerous narrative that these peptides are harmless toys. They are potent, systemic metabolic regulators that demand absolute respect for the titration schedule. I’m recovered now, but I wanted to show the reality of a true metabolic overdose so others recognize the signs of a body shutting down.

If you’re going to experiment with your physiology, do it with an understanding of the lethal risks—not just the benefits.

Be safe.

u/LeanCrafterUK — 20 days ago

You barely know how to train, you barely know how to eat, and you barely know how to stay consistent — but somehow you already want a chemical shortcut.

That’s the part that should embarrass people.

No sleep. No diet. No structure. No patience.

Just copied routines, random gym sessions, and the instant excuse of “genetics” when the mirror doesn’t reward them fast enough.

A lot of these kids don’t need a compound.

They need discipline.

They need consistency.

They need to stop pretending they’re serious when they haven’t even mastered the basics.

The internet has made fast results look normal, so now average effort feels invisible and real effort feels “too slow.”

That’s why so many people want the result without earning the standard.

And that’s exactly why they stay stuck.

u/LeanCrafterUK — 20 days ago

Man thinks $Tao suddenly gonna pull a Bitcoin and go into the top 5 by eoy 2026 .

And other clowns thinking $1000 by end of year w. Are they sleeping , have they not seen the economy . . .

u/LeanCrafterUK — 21 days ago
▲ 61 r/tesco

I’m honestly fuming and want a reality check from people who actually know Tesco policy.

I failed an internal Think 25 test purchase and ended up with a first written warning for negligence. I’m keeping this anonymous because I don’t want to identify anyone involved, but the whole thing feels completely excessive to me.

I had done the training. I used my judgement. The customer was over 25 based on my judgment . I have a clean record. This was not some reckless or deliberate act, it was a judgement call on an age-check policy that literally relies on judgement.

What’s really bothering me is the fact they’ve jumped straight to a written warning like I’ve done something serious or repeatedly messed up. That does not feel fair for a single internal test fail, especially when there’s no prior history and no actual underage sale.

I’m not saying Think 25 doesn’t matter, because obviously it does. But calling this negligence feels like they’re trying to make an example out of one person instead of treating it like a training issue. That’s why I appealed it.

Has anyone else had Tesco come down this hard after one internal test purchase? Did they actually stand by the warning, or did it get overturned?

reddit.com
u/LeanCrafterUK — 21 days ago

4,000 NEAR is about $5,560.

If you already earmark 8 TAO from that NEAR stack, I’d make the remaining 4,000 NEAR a rotation pool and split it like this:

50% into HYPE.

30% into RESI.

20% into Chutes or keep as dry powder for another subnet pullback.

Why this split

HYPE gets the biggest slice because it has the strongest fee-to-buyback mechanism and has been shown to absorb unlock pressure without immediately breaking trend.

RESI gets a meaningful slice because the Plaid partnership gives it a real-world fintech/data bridge, and that is the kind of catalyst that can re-rate a subnet fast if TAO sentiment stays hot.

Chutes gets the smaller slice because it has a stronger long-term subnet thesis, but subnet pricing is more fragile than HYPE and can stall even when the product story is good.

reddit.com
u/LeanCrafterUK — 24 days ago

Chutes has the smaller-cap, product-linked upside that can do stupid multiples in a hot TAO cycle, but it also has much higher subnet risk, and an April report even showed Chutes with large TAO locked while earning zero daily emissions at that point.

Thoughts

reddit.com
u/LeanCrafterUK — 24 days ago