So there is double protect when the same mon protects twice in subsequent turns, and there is double protect when both mons protect on the same turn. The double use (hehe see what I did there?) annoys me, I feel there is a better way. How about as a collective, we start referring to the version where both of your mons protect on the same turn as a "field protect"?
I know AV isn't currently in the game, but if it gets added, do you think an AV Lopunny with klutz and switcheroo would be a great anti-trickroom mon? The perfect Farig counter?
Is that a viable strategy, and has it ever seen use in the past?
I think it might be on the top of my list of things to try if AV enters the game.
Hi all, I've seen some conflicting info on the internet so I'm hoping the community can help me.
My Chomp has both EQ and Stomping Tantrum, and I'm not sure which is stronger in a 2v1 in my favour or in the 1v2 when the opponent has a flying/levitate mon.
In this scenario, it is the regular non-boosted Stomping Tantrum.
For example, if my Chomp is facing an Aerodactyl and a Gengar, and I want to prioritise taking out the Gengar, which attack is more powerful? (Assume that Wide Guard is not a factor).
For another example, what if I have aero on my side next to Chomp and I'm attacking a Sylveon. Is spread EQ still more powerful than an unboosted Tantrum? What if there are 2 opps on the other side?
Hi all, when I was young I had a VCR cassette with a Christmas cartoon on it. I don't remember much but I think one part involved a young boy riding a lion through a snow storm, I think the lion was taking him to the north pole. It was probably a 90s or maybe 80s cartoon, but could have been produced earlier.
Can anyone help me?