u/Loud_Contact8413

Genuine q: how many other families of homicide victims
have publicly showcased in fb videos the gifts they received from supporters to this extent? Cus at this point I’m wondering if this is a normal thing in homicide cases!?

The goncalves family seem to turn “Thank you for your support” into a full blown unboxing series!!

The first pic is from Dylan’s room… showing blood dripping from MM room. (If youre wondering why it’s blue search Amido Black)

If the theory is that BK entered the house.. committed the murders & left in 8 mins who cleaned up the visible blood afterward?

We’re talking about a scene where blood was outside the bedrooms & into the hallway.. not something you’d expect to simply disappear… yet the house was looking relatively clean in some areas!!

So who cleaned it? When? And how within the theory timeline?

At this point are we supposed to believe that the blood cleaned itself?

“sorry, the crime scene is making everyone uncomfortable”: was healing more important than preserving it?

“NO think of the students!!” why did community comfort win over keeping the crime scene?

1122 King Road was demolished on Dec 28- 2023, while the case was still pending & before Kohberger had EVEN been tried!!

The University of Idaho said the house had become a “painful reminder” of the murders.. was affecting students & the surrounding community & had become a destination for media and morbid tourism..

But what exactly is SOOO wrong about it becoming a destination for media coverage? It was the actual crime scene in one of THE MOST high profile murder cases in the country…. Ofc journalists, investigators, researchers & the public were going to be interested in it!!

Isn’t that part of what happens when a major criminal case occurs? Was the solution really to demolish the physical crime scene cus people were paying attention to it? Couldn’t the university have simply restricted access, increased security, or dealt with trespassing & tourism without destroying the building?

“People are interested in the crime scene” is such a pretty weak justification!!

Some victims’ families wanted the house preserved until after the trial (should be their right to ask for that)

The prosecution & defense were given access to document the property through photos, measurement, scans and a 3D reconstruction..& prosecutors said the physical structure wasn’t necessary (HUH????)

But seriously… couldn’t the community sacrifice being uncomfortable just a little longer for the greater good? We’re talking about the physical location of a QUADRUPLE homicide, not sum ugly dorm that people got tired of looking at… but obv, looking at the house was just too emotionally inconvenient… NO that’s such a lame excuse to this really grave mistake!

How many college houses have been demolished cus a horrific crime happened there & some students didn’t feel comfortable seeing the building? If preserving the scene potentially benefited the judicial process… why was community discomfort allowed to outweigh preserving the actual crime scene?

A 3D model and sum photos are NOT the actual structure… distances, lighting, acoustics, door positions can become important when reconstructing events. U know, those pesky little details that tend to matter in a good investigation!!

& the biggest q i have is why not simply wait until after the trial? The building wasn’t going anywhere. Nobody was suggesting it needed to remain standing FOREVER! Once it was demolished, there was literally no going back.

“we documented everything, therefore there was absolutely nothing left to learn” isn’t exactly a compelling reason to destroy an irreplaceable crime scene before the judicial process was finished… If they were so confident that the physical structure had no further value, waiting until after trial shouldn’t have been an impossible sacrifice!

And the irony? The house was demolished partly in the name of healing and moving forward… only for the case to end in a guilty plea instead of the full public trial everyone had been preparing for!!

So I have to ask: was preserving the community’s comfort really more urgent than preserving the physical crime scene until the case was completely over?

Why was protecting the students feelings prioritised over protecting the evidence?

They say the house was too painful to look at, I say it was Too IMPORTANT to destroy

How many judges do you think or prosecutors, or forensic professionals would consider it good practice to permanently demolish the physical location of an active crime scene of a quadruple homicide before the defendant had even gone to trial… simply cus the building had become uncomfortable for the surrounding community?

Since I’m apparently being reported for suicide for raising questions, here’s another one..

Imagine being scared enough around 4am to communicate your fears to BF, who was literally inside the same house, and then there are still hours before the 911 call around 11:58am
And somehow the explanation we’re supposed to accept is:
“She was just a traumatized drunky 🥺 nothing to question!”
So basically DM was like:
“Something is seriously wrong… anyway, goodnight 😴”

At what point are we allowed to ask what actually happened during those hours before 911 was called?
Fear. Confusion. Denial. Intoxication. Trauma.
None of those are magical little “NO FURTHER QUESTIONS” cards that automatically explain everything away.

And please, feel free to hit me with the “unless you’ve personally experienced a quadruple homicide in your college house…” argument again cus ur cousin or whoever the fuck is a firefighter and shared some anecdotes with you has given you the authority to turn your theories into FACTS

Apparently critical thinking requires a very specific trauma résumé:

4 victims! (Preferably 3 females and 1 male aged 20-21)…

College party house (and no not a regular house it has to be a shared college house)

K-Bar (it has to come with a sheath)

Only then are you apparently qualified to ask a basic question. (Or you could just have a firefighter cousin)

HUH???

And here’s another q;
If the explanation for DM’s actions is that intoxication, confusion & trauma prevented her from immediately calling 911, then what explains BF’s actions during those same hours?

I’ll start with my answer; NOTHING!

BF was actively communicating with DM, was apparently coherent enough to respond to her & ultimately participated in getting outside help!!

Delulus need to understand that “traumatized” doesn’t mean immune from scrutiny, and “drunk” doesn’t magically explain every gap in a timeline.

So by all means, look at this convo and tell me again it all makes sense cus DM was a drunky idiot (or you could say ur cousin is a firefighter that works too)

آكل لحالي ومعطيه المجتمع ظهري 😇💓 الفترة الأخيرة صرت زي اليابانيين آكل لحالي كثير

الكيكة حلاها قلييييييل مرة almost like a savoury pastry طعمها قديم كمان واضح ما يهتمو تكون فريش chewy بزيادة ماهي خفيفة تجربة ما تتكرر

‏3/10 for effort in making it

الكولد برو اجي عشانه 8/10

اسمي كان ميليسا والمفروض اني عايشة في ميامي فلوريدا. الشي الحقيقي الوحيد هو عمري؛ كان ١٧. الصور كانت fake وكنت منغمسة بالدور وانزل status واقعية. اعرف وقت مدارسهم وانزل اني طفشانة في البريك.. اعرف وقت holidays وانزل تهاني. كان عندي اكثر من ٤٠٠٠ صديق وصديق اتذكر فيسبوك ما عاد يسمح لي اضيف احد جديد. لغتي كانت كويسة باعتبار اني درست في مناهج حكومية قديمة.. الكل كان يطلب رقمي “so we can text sometime” وكنت اتهرب بطرق تضحك. دوبي الحين دخلت حسابي من ١٠ سنين nostalgia is so real!. ضحكت بصوت عالي على بعض ردودي.. كان فيني جرأة وثقة فقدت جزء كبير منها مع تقدم العمر.

تكلمت مع ناس كثير واعتقد منهم تطورت لغتي. Forever grateful 💓

اتركم مع وحدة من المحادثات 😂

طعم الشاي واضح. الخوخ نكهته مو مؤذية خفيفة ; اخف من ليبتون بس اقوى من ZOI. المفروض محلى بفواكه وهنا يجي طعم الحلا اكثر من ZOI. احسه بيرفكت balance.

Final verdict: 8/10

Would buy again.

متدربة ومالي مكان آكل فيه.. لو رحت السيارة مشوار يخلص البريك 💔

تغير طعمه عن قبل صار مائي أكثر بس ستل حامض ولذيذ 💓

صرفيات السيتالوبرام كاثرة. يا ترى ليش الكل صار مكتئب فجأة؟