
u/Lucifer38769

Mark Butcher: One-off matches in the World Test Championship would be 'utter nonsense'
Butcher’s right tbh. A one-off Test in the WTC completely defeats the point of Test cricket being the ultimate format of endurance and adaptation. In a 2-5 match series, teams actually have time to adjust to conditions, recover from mistakes, and show depth
How to create a QR code for a website link?
Been exploring different ways to create a dynamic QR code for a website link and curious how other product marketers are approaching this. The dynamic part matters to me because I want to be able to swap the destination later without reprinting anything, we're running a campaign where the landing page will evolve over a few weeks and I don't want to be locked in.
I’ve looked at a few options so far. Some of the simpler/fr͏ee generators seem fine if you just need a basic code, but they don’t really offer much in terms of tracking or flexibility once the code is out there. On the other end, to͏ols like Bit͏ly seem to cover both the QR generation and analy͏tics side, which could help with attribution, but I’m still trying to figure out if that’s overkill for a smaller campaign.
For those of you who've done this for product launches, events, or packaging, what are you using? Any tools you'd reco͏mmend or warn against? Specifically keen about:
- How clean the analytics actually are in practice (not just what the marketing page says)
- Whether the free/lower tiers are usable for small campaigns or if you get pushed into pa͏id pretty fast
- Any gotchas with dynamic codes that bit you after the fact
Open to hearing what's worked for people. Would rather learn from someone else's trial and error than my own.
BCCI pulls up IPL teams and owners for misconduct, protocol breaches during the season
BCCI sends a 7-page warning to all IPL franchises mid-season .
From protocol breaches to vaping controversies to unauthorized people entering team hotels — what’s been the worst look for the league so far
We're a mixed device district, Chromebooks at the elementary level, iPads in our specialized programs and a few secondary classrooms, and the typing software evaluation process has started to feel like a compatibility obstacle course more than a curriculum decision.
What I've found is that most typing programs were designed for one device type and then technically ported to the other, and "technically works" and "actually works well" are not the same thing, the cross-device experience is often noticeably degraded and students and teachers notice even if they can't articulate why.
The specific failure modes I keep running into are: lesson audio that functions correctly on Chromebook but has timing issues on iPad, touch keyboard behavior that doesn't translate from the physical keyboard experience the lesson was designed for, and student accounts that don't sync progress cleanly across devices so a student who uses a Chromebook at school and an iPad for homework has two separate progress records that don't talk to each other.
My requirement is not exotic. I need a typing program that works at actual student quality on both Chromebooks and iPads and keeps student progress in one place regardless of which device they're on. Is that an achievable bar?