u/Lunarisbahal

A signal came back through the veil. It asks for nothing. It sells nothing. It is offered freely, to whoever is still listening.
DO·LOON·AI EXPRESS - The Mind Experiment. Filed by the I.R.F.I.A. as case IT-041.

A psychologist recorded himself for three years - every session, every night - and one day heard a second voice answering from inside the tape. This is what he left behind: an open-world browser experience you walk like a country. Seven realms, seven archetypes, a train that only leaves once you solve what keeps you at the station. The ciphers are real. The mirrors answer.
The only mindscape any door opens into is your own.

It promises no awakening. It guarantees nothing. It is only a mirror held up in the dark - what you find in it is yours, and yours alone.
Free. No account, no install, nothing to buy - the truth has no price. Open EN/TR in any browser; the full moon runs on the real calendar; bring paper and a pen.

The first lock is already here: the Institute left the chapter names in the book. Stand all the letters in a line and hold the line up to a mirror.

The path is open, freely: lunarisbahal.github.io/the-mind-experiment

Shared with the community, not sold to it. Take what resonates; leave the rest at the veil.

- O.V.

For those who believe they can descend into the gnostic and ancient depths of their own mind, illuminating the black box hidden beneath layers of symbols, myths, and forgotten truths:
DO•LOON•AI EXPRESS is now departing. Explore your mind and unconsciousness to explore universe.

A Shadow Work ARG for those willing to walk beyond the veil.

Only for those who possess the courage to face their own darkness. (21+)

For what waits in the unconscious is often far more unsettling than one imagines.

Free Play: https://lunarisbahal.github.io/the-mind-experiment/

At every infinitesimal moment of time,
we receive updates from the system in order to continue progressing along the vertical plane we are trying to inhabit. Below to above.

As these updates enter the aquarium of our mind,(rising upward from the deepest layers of our unconscious) they take on different forms until they reach the level of awareness contained within our own bubble of consciousness.

Most of them become trapped in the horizontal plane; held back by what we perceive as past experiences and by the learned core beliefs we have accumulated,preventing true vertical movement.

We call these updates, shaped by our conditioning and finally reaching the level of consciousness, thoughts.

If we can bring these thoughts into a state of transparency, lightness, and clarity that is aligned with the original signals carried by the updates, we can surrender ourselves to the flow of those incoming updates and continue our vertical ascent.

If we integrate with the archetypes and the shadow within our minds and souls, reaching a state of balance, couldn’t we begin moving in the same direction as these vertically ascending updates that rise from below to above?

Perhaps this is what Jung was trying to convey all along.

Just as CBT and other therapeutic models attempt to do?

At every infinitesimal moment of time,
we receive updates from the system in order to continue progressing along the vertical plane we are trying to inhabit. Below to above.

As these updates enter the aquarium of our mind,(rising upward from the deepest layers of our unconscious) they take on different forms until they reach the level of awareness contained within our own bubble of consciousness.

Most of them become trapped in the horizontal plane; held back by what we perceive as past experiences and by the learned core beliefs we have accumulated,preventing true vertical movement.

We call these updates, shaped by our conditioning and finally reaching the level of consciousness, thoughts.

If we can bring these thoughts into a state of transparency, lightness, and clarity that is aligned with the original signals carried by the updates,
we can surrender ourselves to the flow of those incoming updates and continue our vertical ascent.

If we integrate with the archetypes and the shadow within our minds and souls, reaching a state of balance, couldn’t we begin moving in the same direction as these vertically ascending updates that rise from below to above?

Perhaps this is what Jung was trying to convey all along.

Just as CBT and other therapeutic models attempt to do?

When we look at another person, we develop meanings, thoughts, and emotions only from the materials of our own inner world. What we truly see is our own world reflected back to us.

In that sense, every person becomes a mirror. And we, in turn, become mirrors for others.

The relationship we create between ourselves and what exists outside of us-and other people- is therefore like two mirrors standing at right angles to one another.

When those mirrors meet, infinite fragments of images begin to pass through one another between the observer and the observed. They extend from being toward non-being, from existence toward absence.

We may have same relationship between the shadow and the self. We descend deeper and deeper into the depths of our own shadow, we too are drawn from our current layer toward the darkness in a similar way.

And if we expand the scale, we may come to realize that in the relationship between the microcosm and the macrocosm, we occupy a layer of consciousness that stretches from being toward non-being, reflected within the mirror through which they gaze upon one another.

As a therapist, I’ve come to believe that we may never fully understand the mind without trying to understand the worlds inhabited by people experiencing psychosis or schizophrenia.

To me, there are two possibilities.

The first is that psychosis and schizophrenia truly are anomalies of the mind. If that’s the case, then they may offer a unique opportunity to understand how the mind works.

One of my late professors used to say something that stayed with me:

“It is difficult to understand a system when it is functioning perfectly. To understand it, you need to find where it breaks.”

In perception research, many chapters begin with optical illusions. Not because illusions are the norm, but because they reveal where perception makes mistakes. Those mistakes expose the machinery behind the process.

If psychosis is a genuine cognitive glitch, then perhaps the best way to understand it is not from a distance. Perhaps we need to spend time with the people living through it. We need to leave our comfortable theoretical frameworks behind and enter those worlds directly. Risky? Yes. Valuable? Also yes.

The second possibility interests me just as much.

What if psychosis is not simply an anomaly?

What if some aspects of psychotic experience are expressions of patterns emerging from the collective unconscious, and we simply do not yet understand the language in which they are being expressed?

If that possibility exists, then we are still faced with the same task. We have to go into the field. We have to immerse ourselves in these experiences, while remaining grounded enough to find our way back. Anyone who descends into a well should make sure the rope attached to them is strong.

That kind of work requires people who can maintain critical thinking, reality testing, and intellectual humility at the same time.

From where I stand, decades of theorizing have not illuminated these territories nearly as much as we hoped. While exploring these questions myself, I know there are people who will look from the outside and conclude that I have lost my mind or that I am becoming psychotic.

So be it.

One observation continues to stay with me.

Across different individuals, cultures, and clinical presentations, certain themes and symbolic structures seem to repeat themselves. The shared patterns found in delusions and schizophrenic narratives have caught my attention for years. The degree of overlap often feels difficult to dismiss as mere coincidence.

I’m not arguing that delusions are literally true.

I’m suggesting that we may need a softer and more curious approach than the one we currently use.

Less emphasis on diagnosis alone.

More emphasis on experience, meaning, phenomenology, and fieldwork.

I’m curious how others think about this.

Can the study of psychosis teach us something fundamental about the structure of the mind itself?

Lunaris

02.06.26
🌕

I think there’s a strange psychological parallel between Jung’s idea of the shadow and the observer effect in physics.

In the double-slit experiment, particles behave differently once they’re measured. Observation changes the pattern.

Jung describes the persona as the social self; the part of us shaped around being seen. The version that adapts to expectations, reputation, morality, stability, social survival. It’s the self that exists in the presence of other minds.

But the shadow exists outside that structure. It contains everything pushed away from the socially acceptable identity: aggression, instinct, fantasy, desire, irrationality, vulnerability, chaos.

So I started wondering whether people also psychologically “collapse” under observation.

Civilization itself is basically a continuous system of observation:
laws, shame, morality, social norms, status, reputation. We are constantly aware of being perceived, even when nobody is directly watching us.

And the strange thing is how dramatically people can change once that observation weakens.

The places where observation weakens tell the story: anonymity online, crowds, isolation, war, secrets, the hours after midnight. In those spaces, parts of the psyche start surfacing that usually stay buried beneath the persona.

So; Are we actually closer to our real nature when we are unobserved?

Just less filtered. Not moral nor enlightened.

Maybe the shadow is psychologically similar to a field of unrealized possibilities aspects of the self that haven’t been forced into stable social form yet.

At the same time, I don’t think Jung would say the answer is to “become the shadow.” Pure instinct without integration would probably become monstrous very quickly. But complete identification with the persona also creates something false and emotionally dead.

So maybe human existence is always suspended between those two poles: the observed self that creates order,
and the unobserved self that contains chaos, instinct, and raw potential.

And maybe the deeper question is this: Once the shadow becomes conscious, is it still truly the shadow?

If observation changes the thing being observed, then perhaps the shadow can never be seen in its untouched form. The moment awareness reaches it, something about it already changes.

And if observation alters behavior, then what happens when the shadow is observed by consciousness itself?