
Why destruction in Man of Steel served a character purpose
So I recently rewatched Man of Steel for the umpteenth time after seeing Supergirl (had to do an annual DCU palette cleanse), and it hit me that the destruction in Man of Steel served a very important purpose: Showing there is only one Superman. Superman’s greatest weakness is not Kryptonite, or magic, or even red suns, it’s the fact he can’t be everywhere, all the time, all at once. He’s not omnipresent. In Man of Steel, it’s a two pronged attack. Zod puts two world engines on opposite sides of the world, Superman has to fly around the world and destroy one in the Indian Ocean, fly all the way back in like 30 seconds and stop Zod from shooting the bomb down. An impressive feat to be sure, but by the time he’s done that there’s already been thousands of casualties caused by the first world engine.
How does Superman circumvent this lack of omnipresence? He inspires HOPE in other people. He establishes the ideal, not to be some god, but to inspire others to help other people and be the best person they can be. The whole film Clark gets help from regular human allies. And in the end it’s these human allies that help him defend Earth from superpowered Kryptonians. It would be really easy for Clark to look at Zods ship and all those Kryptonians and be like “I think I’ll join that team.” But it’s the lessons from Pa Kent that taught him to stand with humans. It’s the Clark Kent side that actually proves more effective, because he couldn’t have done it without those allies.
It’s actually hilarious when you realize people who complain about the casualties Superman caused in the movie (even though he didn’t cause any casualties it was all Zod and the world engines) are literally just Lex Luthor and Batman in BvS. Buying into those same fears, looking like the goofies standing in front of the courtroom with “Superman sucks” shirts on. Goofies that don’t understand the character.