u/Madam_Mimm_13

▲ 283 r/PetPeeves

Targeted advertising that violates my privacy and still has the audacity to be this wrong.

I accept that every app is siphoning off my data like a goblin with a Capri Sun. Horrifying. Expected.

But if you’re going to scrape my data with the grim devotion of a raccoon licking grease out of a Waffle House dumpster, aim better.

TikTok has apparently decided my deepest unmet need is AI romantasy porn.

Every third video is some uncanny fae warlord with shovel-jaw anatomy, wax-museum abs, a sentient lizard on his shoulder, and a caption like:

“He was sent to destroy her kingdom… until her scent awakened the dragon inside him.”

Ma’am. No.

You had my books, my garden, my cast iron collection, my gym music, my chemistry rabbit holes, my anti-consumption rage, my academic neuroses, my grocery habits, my outdoorsy interests, my late-night curiosity clicks, and probably my blood type.

And your conclusion was: reptile-adjacent elf boyfriend sludge.

That’s what offends me. The incompetence.

You violated my privacy and still failed the assignment.

Sell me heirloom seeds, doc martens, lab glassware, weird academic books, lifting straps, witchy jewelry, cast iron, or moisturizer formulated by a medieval nun with a chemistry degree. I would respect the precision.

This is algorithmic slander.

reddit.com
u/Madam_Mimm_13 — 2 days ago

Rosie is Innocent of ALL CHARGES!!!!

*Apologies for my repeat posting!!!! I was having technical difficulties. I’ve deleted all errant posts. This is the only post I will post. Sorry!!!*

I’ve seen a lot of people both-sides-ing this altercation and it’s very clear to me that not only was Kelsey the one in the wrong, but also there’s some questionable behavior here displayed by production that I think crosses a serious line in terms of how they should and should not be allowed to manipulate somebody’s personal space and storyline.

So I watched this over and over and honestly? I can’t see anything Rosie did wrong. None of this would have happened if Kelsey left the first 50 times she was told, and production needs to back all the way off. It’s making me uncomfortable that they RE-opened her door. Kind of dismantles any argument that putting their hands on Rosie was an attempt to prevent violence/injury.

Photo 1: Kelsey pushing Rosie, who is screaming at her that Kelsey is “nothing” and this is after Rosie has told Kelsey to leave her house over a dozen times.

Photo 2: after telling Kelsey to leave her house over 2 dozen times, Rosie picks up the suitcase and starts to take it downstairs for Kelsey because she is not leaving and Kelsey tries to pull the bag out of her hands.

Photo 3: Kelsey again, making physical contact with Rosie and trying to physically prevent Rosie from walking back into her home while standing in the doorway and hooking Rosie’s arm prompting Rosie to…

Photo 4: … push Kelsey out out of her door, (reminder this is after she’s already told Kelsey to leave her home over three dozen times and Kelsey will not leave and tried to stay and pull her bag back up the stairs when Rosie was trying to walk her out the door after saying, I will help you)

Photo 5: after finally getting Kelsey out of her home, a male member of production physically puts their hands on Rosie trying to get her to stop closing Kelsey out of her home. And tells her to “Stop”

Photo 6: Rosie retreats upstairs because again she’s been asking Kelsey to leave repeatedly for quite some time now, she’s yelling (likely at production) that she’s “sick of this shit”

Photo 7: production immediately reopened the *door to the Rosie‘s home*, allowing Kelsey to come back in and yell at her about the pageant, prompting the slam 🐷 comment.

Anyway, I think this clears up who did what. None of this would’ve happened if Kelsey would’ve just left the first 50 times that she was asked to, and I’m super uncomfortable with the role that production played and not allowing Rosie to set a boundary in her own home.

u/Madam_Mimm_13 — 5 days ago
▲ 112 r/PetPeeves

Men in Trucks™️

First off, before you come at me with “not all men/trucks/men in trucks/whatever…”

You know the type.

The one who treats every parking lot, drive-thru, merge lane, bank entrance, school pickup line, and two-lane road like the built environment is merely a suggestion he has graciously agreed to consider.

The one driving the HMS Compensation through public space as if everyone else is an NPC in his personal infrastructure simulator.
This truck is a four-wheeled ego scaffold. operated by someone who has never once considered that other people also have places to be, children to retrieve, appointments to make, or nervous systems being slowly sandblasted by his rolling monument to entitlement.

The audacity is never confined to the truck. It spills outward. This personality is negatively correlated with the amount of times the truck has ever been used for something you couldn’t do with a car.

reddit.com
u/Madam_Mimm_13 — 7 days ago

Dorit’s Encino Home up for auction 5/20, $500k behind on two mortgages totaling $6M+, while also spending $1.4M on designer goods, travel, and glam.

PK is creating a record.
He is not just saying “Dorit spends too much.”, as Kyle-haters would have you believe.

He is saying: I tried to sell, she refused; she lived in the house; she did not pay the mortgage/utilities; she spent heavily on herself; the house is now at risk; therefore the court needs to intervene before the asset is lost.

The point is: she had access to money, chose glam/wardrobe/travel, and did not use it to protect the marital home or stabilize the kids’ housing situation. That is a much more damaging argument in family court than “my ex likes handbags.”

>Dorit made no mortgage payments on the home despite having exclusive use of the property while he says he covered about 90% of the family’s expenses, including the mortgages, household costs and most expenses tied to their kids.

>PK says he spent more than a year trying to avoid this outcome ... pointing to financial records, forensic accounting, and months of emails and lender communications he claims show repeated efforts to resolve the situation and push for a sale.

And when solutions are offered, or anyone questions her, or just when she wants to hustle $100k more out of him, she threatens to play “dirty games” while on the phone with an attorney trying to help her refinance the mortgage, refuses to sign the papers, refuses to pay the mortgage, and goes full speed ahead into a much worse outcome.

>According to court documents obtained by TMZ in a report published Friday, May 8, PK claims he offered to let Dorit and their two children — son Jagger, 12, and daughter Phoenix, 10 — move into his current home after he vacated the property they shared during their marriage. Her alleged response? “Over my f***ing dead body.”

>How do you know there’s no auction on April 30?” Dorit asked him. “I don’t think we are aware of everything that is happening now that the foreclosure has been registered.”
“You have a fast track to resolving the issues with the house and that is to sign the agreements that have been provided,” PK shot back. “To date you have chosen a different path that leads to a different result.”
Dorit then asked him what he was “talking about.”
“I’m waiting on you,” she continued. “I’ve told you 100 different ways I will sign the agreement, but you haven’t paid the arrears or taken it out of foreclosure and now your lawyer is delaying. Are you now saying you won’t pay the arrears and take the house out of foreclosure like you promised?”

Coupled with the fact that she’s looking for more expensive homes than the one she currently isn’t paying for?

u/Madam_Mimm_13 — 13 days ago

There is a very specific kind of adult woman who makes adult choices, creates adult consequences, and then somehow still gets treated like a fragile romantic heroine who just needs to be understood. Carrie Bradshaw lived there for decades. Amanda has been renting in the same building.

And I think part of why this feels so obvious now is because Sarah Jessica Parker has done such a spectacular job shitting all over the nostalgia a lot of us collectively carried for Sex and the City. A lot of the content was and still is relevant, but the spell has broken around Carrie as a character. On rewatch, she is less whimsical romantic chaos goblin and more grown woman who repeatedly detonates her own life, hurts people, narrates around it, and still gets rescued from the worst consequences of her own decisions.

That tracks with Amanda’s public image right now.

For years, Amanda was protected by the chaos around her. Kyle was loud, embarrassing, drunk, immature, and easy to blame. Paige, Lindsay, Ciara, Danielle, and the rest of the cast were more dynamic, more polarizing, more entertaining, more obviously messy. Amanda got to sit in the middle of that looking tired, pretty, wounded, and reasonable by comparison.

That comparison did a lot of heavy lifting.

In light of recent events, the question becomes: was Amanda actually the reasonable one, or was she just quieter? Was she mature, or did she benefit from being surrounded by louder dysfunction? Was she sympathetic, or was Kyle absorbing so much of the heat that nobody looked too closely at her?

Carrie was surrounded by women who were funnier, sharper, more interesting, and often more self-aware. The show told us she was the center, so we accepted her as the center. Amanda has benefited from a similar narrative ecosystem. She did not need to be the most compelling person in the room because the room was already doing the work for her.

And now the lighting has changed.

reddit.com
u/Madam_Mimm_13 — 25 days ago