u/Many-Scene-4268

The crew is back!! We missed you guys!

Failing to establish an independent human-resources department for the production.
Failing to designate a qualified HR representative for cast and crew.
Allowing Justin Baldoni to function simultaneously as actor, director, executive producer, Wayfarer co-chairman and effective workplace supervisor without meaningful oversight.
Allowing Jamey Heath to function as producer and senior Wayfarer executive without independent HR supervision.
Creating a conflict of interest in which complaints about Baldoni or Heath would have to be reported to people under their authority.
Failing to establish an independent reporting channel for complaints against senior production leadership.
Failing to provide a confidential complaint procedure.
Failing to provide an anonymous complaint procedure.
Failing to appoint a neutral investigator capable of investigating Baldoni and Heath.
Failing to provide cast and crew with an employee handbook.
Failing to distribute a written sexual-harassment policy.
Failing to distribute a written discrimination policy.
Failing to distribute a written anti-retaliation policy.
Failing to distribute a respectful-workplace or code-of-conduct policy.
Failing to advise cast and crew how to report harassment.
Failing to advise cast and crew who was responsible for receiving complaints.
Failing to advise workers of their legal rights concerning harassment and retaliation.
Failing to provide sexual-harassment-prevention training.
Failing to provide workplace-conduct training to directors and producers.
Failing to provide supervisory harassment training to Baldoni and Heath.
Failing to provide consent and boundaries training appropriate for a film involving sex, nudity and domestic violence.
Failing to provide adequate intimacy-protocol training to the director.
Failing to provide adequate intimacy-protocol training to producers.
Failing to establish written procedures governing intimate scenes.
Failing to establish clear actor-consent procedures before filming began.
Failing to require written approval for changes involving kissing, nudity, simulated sex or intimate touching.
Failing to require revisions involving intimate content to be disclosed before filming.
Failing to ensure the intimacy coordinator had sufficient authority to stop or modify scenes.
Failing to require the intimacy coordinator’s continuous presence for scenes that could become intimate.
Failing to prevent the director from adding intimate material outside the approved script.
Failing to establish a closed-set policy for nudity or simulated nudity.
Failing to establish monitor-security rules for nude or partially nude scenes.
Failing to establish rules preventing personal phones, tablets or unauthorized devices from displaying sensitive footage.
Failing to establish dressing-room and trailer privacy protocols.
Failing to establish procedures requiring permission before entering an actor’s trailer.
Failing to establish lactation accommodations before production began.
Failing to assess the needs of a recently postpartum and breastfeeding performer.
Failing to develop a lawful lactation-break schedule.
Failing to provide an appropriate private lactation space protected from intrusion.
Failing to establish maternal-health accommodations.
Failing to establish adequate infectious-disease reporting protocols.
Failing to ensure the production carried appropriate COVID or communicable-disease coverage.
Allowing insurance considerations to influence whether workers were informed of a workplace exposure.
Failing to plan for production shutdowns associated with a COVID outbreak.
Failing to conduct an adequate risk assessment for intimate scenes.
Failing to conduct an adequate risk assessment for the childbirth scene.
Failing to create a written nudity rider before requesting partial nudity.
Failing to secure informed consent for nudity before the day of filming.
Failing to disclose proposed nudity during contract negotiations.
Failing to identify all persons who would be present during partially nude filming.
Failing to limit sensitive-set access to essential personnel.
Failing to appropriately vet or cast the actor playing the obstetrician in an exceptionally intimate scene.
Permitting Baldoni to place a personal friend in close physical proximity to Lively’s nearly exposed genital area during the childbirth scene.
Failing to assess whether that casting decision created a privacy, consent or conflict-of-interest problem.
Failing to adequately plan modesty garments and coverings.
Failing to provide coverings immediately between takes.
Failing to establish a procedure for stopping filming when an actor withdrew consent.
Failing to clarify that consent to scripted acting was not blanket consent to improvisation.
Failing to separate directing authority from intimate physical participation by the director.
Failing to address the elevated coercion risk created when a director performs intimate scenes with an actor he supervises.
Discussing pornography with Lively in the workplace.
Repeatedly discussing alleged pornography addiction with Lively.
Continuing sexual discussions after Lively indicated that she did not want to participate.
Discussing pornography in front of cast and crew.
Publicly revealing that Lively had said she had never watched pornography.
Disclosing private information obtained during a personal conversation.
Discussing prior sexual encounters with Lively.
Discussing sexual partners on the first day of production.
Speaking about a woman as though she had been passed from one man to another.
Discussing whether Baldoni had always obtained consent from sexual partners.
Stating that he had not always listened when women said no.
Making statements suggesting previous sexual boundary violations.
Discussing personal sexual behavior during a professional car ride.
Asking Lively whether she and her husband climaxed simultaneously.
Describing Baldoni’s own sexual relationship and simultaneous orgasms with his partner.
Using personal sexual experiences as a justification for adding a simultaneous-orgasm scene.
Making sexual comments unrelated to any legitimate production need.
Making sexual comments in the presence of subordinates.
Creating a sexualized workplace atmosphere.
Normalizing explicit sexual discussions among cast and crew.
Failing to stop sexual discussions initiated by production leadership.
Subjecting assistants and other employees to explicit sexual conversations.
Showing Lively and her assistant a video of a fully nude woman giving birth.
Displaying a woman with her legs spread and genital area exposed without first obtaining the viewers’ consent.
Showing intimate footage of Heath’s wife in a professional workplace.
Potentially distributing or displaying intimate footage without adequate documented permission from the person depicted.
Failing to warn Lively and her assistant about the video’s explicit content.
Treating Lively’s discomfort with explicit imagery as unreasonable or abnormal.
Continuing to create sexual discomfort after objections were expressed.
Using executive authority to expose workers to sexual material.
Discussing genitalia or intimate anatomy outside legitimate scene preparation.
Making comments about Lively’s breasts or cleavage.
Calling Lively sexually attractive or sexy in a supervisory work context.
Making comments about her smell during an improvised intimate interaction.
Sexualizing Lively personally rather than discussing the character.
Blurring the boundary between actor-to-actor contact and director-to-subordinate conduct.
Creating a gender-based hostile work environment.
Creating a sex-based hostile work environment.
Subjecting a female performer to unwanted sexualized speech.
Subjecting other female employees or cast members to inappropriate conduct.
Continuing the conduct after learning that women on the production were uncomfortable.
Failing to correct conduct that was severe or pervasive enough to interfere with working conditions.
Failing to prevent sexual harassment.
Failing to take all reasonable steps necessary to prevent harassment.
Aiding or permitting harassment by a production executive.
Ratifying inappropriate conduct by failing to discipline the participants.
Allowing supervisors to engage in conduct that ordinary employees could reasonably understand as mandatory to tolerate.
Creating a coercive environment because the alleged harassers controlled directing, producing, employment and creative decisions.
Hugging employees or cast members without clear consent.
Repeatedly touching cast or crew members who attempted to avoid physical contact.
Becoming irritated, cold or uncooperative when workers resisted hugging or touching.
Conditioning workplace warmth or cooperation on acceptance of physical contact.
Using supervisory authority to pressure people to tolerate unwanted touching.
Improvising kisses not contained in the approved script.
Repeatedly attempting to kiss Lively during a scene that did not call for kissing.
Kissing Lively’s forehead without advance discussion.
Rubbing Baldoni’s face and mouth against Lively’s neck without advance agreement.
Placing his thumb against her mouth.
Flicking or manipulating her lower lip.
Caressing her without advance choreography.
Biting Lively’s lip during filming.
Sucking on Lively’s lip during filming.
Repeating unapproved intimate conduct across multiple takes.
Continuing intimate conduct after Lively physically pulled away.
Failing to stop after clear nonverbal resistance.
Exploiting an active camera and live production environment to initiate unapproved contact.
Improvising sexual or intimate conduct while acting as both scene partner and director.
Failing to obtain affirmative consent before each material change in intimate action.
Failing to choreograph intimate physical contact.
Failing to rehearse intimate physical contact.
Failing to notify the intimacy coordinator about intended intimate action.
Performing intimate conduct without the intimacy coordinator present.
Filming repeated takes beyond legitimate creative necessity where the takes included unwanted intimacy.
Failing to provide Lively a meaningful opportunity to object before filming began.
Treating an actor’s participation in a scene as consent to any physical improvisation.
Treating a general professional relationship as consent to hugging or touching.
Violating established entertainment-industry consent practices.
Violating SAG-AFTRA intimacy and simulated-sex guidance.
Failing to protect performers from surprise intimate contact.
Failing to distinguish consent to performance from personal consent.
Creating a battery risk through unauthorized physical contact.
Creating an assault risk through attempted unwanted intimate contact.
Using the director-performer power imbalance to obtain apparent acquiescence.
Failing to recognize that humor, appeasement or remaining in character does not constitute consent.
Failing to respond to withdrawal of consent.
Adding graphic sexual material after Lively accepted the role without obtaining her consent.
Adding an orgasm scene without advance approval.
Attempting to retain a simultaneous-orgasm scene after Lively objected.
Adding foreplay or other sexual content outside the script on which the performer relied when accepting the role.

is Taylor Swift and her wedding the problem or are you just contributing the literacy crisis?

h/t: rosieblabs on TikTok

Starts in 45min!

We're covering a bunch of stories so come hang out with us tonight

We've got some great stories for tonight, so come hang out.

Harvey Weinstein rushed to hospital. NY businesses complaining about MSG shut down during busy World Cup Weekend. A couple climbed the Empire State Building and got arrested for it.

Come hang out or watch the replay!

https://www.youtube.com/live/6thhGoWA8Sc?si=noQTk99-CkpWNl4m

The movies they are going to make about this president 50 years from now will be totally outrageous and unbelievable on the one hand, and totally true on the other. Just when we thought Four Seasons Landscaping couldn't be topped, Donald Trump threw himself an MMA 80th birthday bash (at great expense to the tax payer no doubt) that will forever be remembered as ridiculous and embarrassing.

We've got a ton of stories to talk about including a bizarre Hollywood murder and more.

Los Angeles D.A. is looking into s@xual battery charges against Diddy, and the allegations against him are utterly hideous.

We're also reading more from the Pope's message about A.I. and the human race.

We're talking Lively's day in court and Pope Leo's message to big tech.

We're talking Lively v Baldoni and Pope Leo's message to big tech. Come and hang out with us.

This man has lieabetes.

Lets not forget that he trolled Blake and Taylor at the height of the smear campaign with his TMZ IG post.

Lets not forget that he was Ye's manager during snakegate.

Lets not forget he constantly trolled TS while he was managing the beibs.

Lets not forget that the only way he'd give Taylor a chance to buy her own music back was with an NDA for her to never talk bad about him and to still have 30% ownership of her music.

NOBODY LIKES YOU DUDE! except for Bibi maybe, embarrassing