Third Times the Charm:  Discussion: Continued targeting, doxxing and harassment of CCs and Reddit users to promote propaganda and shut down speech and debate.

Third Times the Charm: Discussion: Continued targeting, doxxing and harassment of CCs and Reddit users to promote propaganda and shut down speech and debate.

I am recreating my prior posts (2) to redact personal information and images that many thought would just fuel the continued horrific treatment of a single person that has long provided commentary on the Lively/Baldoni saga.

IMO being banned from saying a persons name is an unserious 'solution' to a much larger issue of personal behaviour choices, disregard of Sub and Reddit Rules and cannot and will not ever stop determined individuals from seeking to harm them. But, I get the concerns and respect the POV of all that voiced them. IMO Group action and vigilance at the subreddit level IMO are needed to stop these horrific posts from appearing.

But, for those that reached out I hear your issues (even if I don't agree) and redacted but kept the framework of the disgusting post from a long time BAD ACTOR who IMO deserves to be banned YET AGAIN from Reddit so those that doubt this issue of ongoing harassment exists can see the proof with their own eyes. IMO without group action at the subreddit level to report these kinds of posts and comments, nothing will ever change and TAG and the others who undertake these coordinated campaigns will continue to do this not only on reddit but on other subreddits as well.

THIS GARBAGE POST ENDED UP IN MY FEED THIS AM (I don't subscribe to that subreddit) and the fact that such HATE and NONSENSE is happening weeks after case settlement tells me that what is going on now isn't necessarily about the prior case but possibly part of testing tactics and strategy for future use. Its also I believe testimony to the fact that hate fuels more hate and I think we have many around who just come to get their daily 'fix' of hate.

This is why I believe everyone needs to get together, be aware of comments that aren't genuine or are repetitive or come from low/negative karma posters and hit the comments that are designed to derail true conversation, even where folks disagree! These posts aren't designed to do anything other than derail conversation, create chaos and impact SEO, foster hate and doubt, spew propaganda to support an agenda and reinvent/rewrite history. I hope people can see this more clearly now as I know many don't agree that this is happening.

There can be NO DOUBT that the hate and aggressive actions to suppress speech continue here and the overall effect of what has been going on recently IMO can only stop if folks are diligent and report such activity when they see it. Many casual visitors here deny what has been going on and my purpose for posting this DISGUSTING POST by a KNOWN BAD ACTOR is to show that this activity is happening and in recent weeks has been accelerating IMO.

The issue of what has been going on in this small subreddit IMO is also beyond a single person as there have been MANY people who have been threatened, harassed and doxxed over the past two years and these issues continue and the purpose of the post was to make those aware that weren't aware that only subreddit awareness and coordinated action will make this subreddit what it used to be before the intentional targeting, distractions and nonsense non-serious repetitive comments continue to flood in.

The reason for the original post was NOT to hurt/harm a single CC (as many good people have been hurt and harmed over the past 2 years) but to point out that the vicious and seeming unstoppable harassment and doxxing continues and that action is needed.

To preserve parts of the earlier post I have included my responses to those that disagree with the post below as a single comment. I believe that silence as a response to HATE an BREAKING REDDIT RULES is NOT THE ANSWER.

I hear your concerns and even if I disagree that mentioning a persons name has any impact on anything, I respect your collective views and so removed the involved names. IMO the issues present here go WAY beyond a single CC who has been treated horrifically for 2 years now and who continues to be targeted. The situation of the treatment of the CC no doubt has entered the criminal realm as having been doxxed myself I well know that law enforcement and court action is needed to TRY and stop the behaviour but even then the results of law enforcement IMO are quite mixed.

The issues present here IMO relate to an existing small subreddit community and to other small subreddit communities who in the future will no doubt be similarly targeted by the identical well organized thuggish behaviour we have ALL sadly witnessed over the past two years and which tragically continues today and is harming this previously peaceful subreddit.

IF anyone has some better ideas on how to address what continues to happen on this subreddit then please post ideas below.

 

u/JJJOOOO — 5 days ago

Hollywood Reporter - Alexa Nikolas Wins Key Ruling In Defamation Case Against Bryan Freedman Over Smear Claims (Archive Link below)

Justin Baldoni's lawyer and crisis publicist Melissa Nathan are implicated in the creation of smear websites, a court finds.

Months after a resolution to the sprawling legal battle over the filming of It Ends With Us, Hollywood power lawyer Bryan Freedman is still dealing with fallout from the case.

Zoey 101 alum Alexa Nikolas won a key ruling on Wednesday in a defamation lawsuit against Freedman, with a court finding that she’s established a probability of prevailing on defamation claims accusing him and those in his orbit of marshaling a smear campaign against her.

For those that cannot access HR site, here is archive link to article:

http://archive.today/2026.08.14-064505/https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/business/business-news/alexa-nikolas-defamation-case-bryan-freedman-1236673163/

Here is link to the HR article "Inside the Secret Smear Machine":

https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/business/business-news/inside-hollywood-smear-campaign-scandals-1236501807/

hollywoodreporter.com
u/JJJOOOO — 7 days ago
▲ 84 r/ItEndsWithCourt+2 crossposts

BL Opposition to JW motion for Discovery (District Court, W.D. Texas Docket Number: 1:25-cv-00163, #62)

Very interesting and relatively short read. BL makes many of the arguments raised here in the thread on JW’s filing, concluding:

“For weeks the Wallace Parties took the position behind closed doors that Ms. Lively was bound by a piece of paper that they now concede has never had any legal basis whatsoever. Their suggestion, now, that by ignoring that “Notice” Ms. Lively somehow “failed to appear” for a deposition is absurd. Tellingly, the Wallace Parties do not have the temerity to ask for fees or sanctions in connection with that purported “failure,” nor could they, given their concession in the same brief that such a notice could only have been valid with leave of court. It is indefensible even to suggest that Rule 37 sanctions could apply to Ms. Lively’s refusal to put up with a lawless deposition notice—and can only be understood as a further attempt to attack Ms. Lively’s reputation with unsupported
accusations of wrongdoing that Mr. Wallace can then propagate into the social media universe.
The only alternative is worse: namely, that the Wallace Parties served the sham deposition
notice not because they thought they had a basis to do so absent leave of court, but as a leverage
play to pressure Ms. Lively to drop her fee claims. The circumstances of the Wallace Parties’ initial
email to Ms. Lively’s counsel speak for themselves, as does the Wallace Parties’ later concession
that there was no lawful basis to serve a deposition notice at that time.”

storage.courtlistener.com
u/Complex_Visit5585 — 8 days ago

NYP Article “Blake Lively vs. Justin Baldoni legal battle sparks another bitter lawsuit”

NYP article on the JV legal papers filed yesterday and a comment from the DM.

pagesix.com
u/JJJOOOO — 9 days ago

James Vituscka (Plaintiff) v. Mail Media Inc. and d/b/a Daily Mail (Defendant)

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK
----------------------------------------------------------------------X
JAMES VITUSCKA,

Plaintiff, -against-

MAIL MEDIA INC., individually and d/b/a DAILY MAIL,

Defendant.

No case file assigned yet as not yet reviewed by Court Clerk.

Get out the popcorn!

1st declaration:https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.nysd.634304/gov.uscourts.nysd.634304.286.1.pdf

2nd declaration:https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.nysd.634304/gov.uscourts.nysd.634304.684.0.pdf

iapps.courts.state.ny.us
u/JJJOOOO — 10 days ago
▲ 48 r/ItEndsWithTruth+1 crossposts

James Vituscka Sues Daily Mail: Claims Coercion, Whistleblower Retaliation in Lively v. Wayfarer Fallout

(Originally posted by u/Jumpy-Contest7860 in withblakelively)

Vituscka alleges that *Daily Mail* executives and legal counsel improperly pressured and coerced him into executing an incomplete, misleading sworn declaration regarding his text messages about publicist Leslie Sloane. He further claims that after he raised internal ethical objections to the statement and submitted a whistleblower report, the outlet terminated his employment in unlawful retaliation.

**Causes of Action:**

**Statutory violation of state whistleblower protection laws (e.g., NY Labor Law § 740).**

Vituscka asserts that he engaged in protected whistleblower activity when he formally reported and objected to internal misconduct regarding the draft subpoena declaration. He claims his sudden termination was direct, unlawful retaliation for reporting that the outlet was pressuring a employee-witness to submit a misleading statement under penalty of perjury.

**Fraudulent inducement / Breach of duty of good faith and fair dealing.**

The filing claims *Daily Mail* management and corporate counsel coerced him into signing his initial June 2025 declaration. Vituscka alleges he was induced to sign an incomplete statement drafted primarily to shield the outlet and third-party PR contacts (such as Leslie Sloane) from broader discovery and depositions, despite his explicit warnings that the draft omitted critical context.

**Breach of contract and failure to provide independent legal counsel.**

Vituscka contends that when he was dragged into the *Lively v. Wayfarer* litigation as a third-party witness purely due to his reporting duties, the *Daily Mail* had a legal and contractual duty to protect his interests. Instead, he claims the company prioritised its corporate relationships over his defense, creating an irreconcilable conflict of interest by steering his testimony without offering him unconflicted, independent representation.

**Intentional interference with prospective economic advantage / Injurious falsehood.**

The complaint alleges that the *Daily Mail*’s public positioning and subsequent termination of Vituscka framed him as a rogue reporter acting outside journalistic norms. Vituscka claims this publicly destroyed his journalistic credibility, torpedoed his career, and caused severe financial, emotional, and reputational damages.

1st declaration: https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.nysd.634304/gov.uscourts.nysd.634304.286.1.pdf

2nd declaration: https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.nysd.634304/gov.uscourts.nysd.634304.684.0.pdf

**Court filing**: https://iapps.courts.state.ny.us/nyscef/ViewDocument?docIndex=S\_PLUS\_X/dAjbdeJOY0K45ADgQQ==

iapps.courts.state.ny.us
u/Complex_Visit5585 — 10 days ago

Friday Evening Giggle - Daily Mail: Enes Kanter Six-foot-10 (and 250 pounds) former Knicks and Celtics star officially declares for WNBA Draft as league's trans debate explodes!

Six-foot-10 former Knicks and Celtics star officially declares for WNBA Draft as league's trans debate explodes!

Litigation will likely follow and I highly suggest watching his video on insta and X where he explains his plans with the WNBA draft. I do wonder how many takes it took to get the the video smirk and laughter free BUT HE DID IT. WNBA has been active on social media recently speaking about the importance of the league being 'inclusive' and it sounds like he plans to take them up on their words.

Well known WNBA player Sophie Cunningham has spoken out about the importance of keeping bio girls and women safe when playing sports.

Clay Travis this week announced he is exploring the idea of purchasing an expansion team for Nashville where all players would be bio males identifying as being female. His proposed name for the team is the Nashville BALLS! Perhaps if it ever happens we might see Justin and Emily Baldoni courtside cheering on their favorite local player!

For those that don't recall the Ex-NBA star Enes Kanter Freedom, he spoke out strongly against the CCP while playing at the Celtics and was terminated. He had his game sneakers painted to display all the issues he believed were important to him and apparently these many different sneakers deeply disturbed the deeply blue city Bostonians - I recall a particular outrage with the plain white sneakers with the black marker that simply said 'FREEDOM". Will try and find an image of some of the sneakers and post below.

https://nypost.com/2022/07/03/enes-kanter-freedom-hypocritical-nba-pushing-me-to-retire/

Here is another Reddit post with the announcement video:

https://www.reddit.com/r/WNBAgossips/comments/1vi7juq/former_nba_1st_rd_pick_enes_kanter_freedom_has/

dailymail.com
u/JJJOOOO — 14 days ago

Discussion: The ‘Manosphere’ Isn’t a Movement. It’s a Multibillion-Dollar Grievance Industry

From article: Many young men are driven to resentment and are financially exploited as influencers sell them classes, pills, and the illusion of clout, a new report reveals.

Reading this article I can definitely see a place for 'sex pest' Justin Baldoni in the 'Manosphere'. Nobody does a grievance better than Baldoni imo and his wife's recent claim of his being 'wrongfully accused' my guess was the launching pad for his next 'act'.

Archive Link: http://archive.today/2026.08.07-104317/https://www.wired.com/story/the-manosphere-isnt-a-movement-its-a-multibillion-dollar-grievance-industry/

wired.com
u/JJJOOOO — 14 days ago

Light Summer End Drama: New York Post - Married Lawyer caught canoodling in Central Park with co-worker Associate - Partner at Wachtell, Lipton in NYC.

Waiting for litigation to drop as Partner was supposedly put on 'leave' pending an investigation into the relationship with a co-worker on his team. His wife is apparently a former prosecutor and no response yet has been seen from her regarding the leaked video and multiple articles.

https://nypost.com/2026/07/30/us-news/lawyer-caught-canoodling-in-central-park-stands-to-lose-millions-as-lucrative-job-offer-reneged/

houseandwhips.com
u/JJJOOOO — 22 days ago

Meet the Woman Who Stands to Inherit Much of Jeffrey Epstein's Fortune - Karen Shuliak

Quotes from Article:

Dr. Shuliak was the last person Mr. Epstein called before he killed himself in his jail cell in 2019. She could inherit as much as $100 million from his estate, including a 33-carat diamond ring, according to a trove of investigative records released by federal authorities.

Her attempt to forge something of a normal life, though, was soon shattered when the Justice Department released three million pages of investigative files and emails it had gathered on Mr. Epstein. The files, released in late January, included thousands of intimate emails between Dr. Shuliak and Mr. Epstein and dozens of photographs of her and of them together.

Suddenly, their nearly eight-year relationship was on vivid display for all to see. They had fights about sex — with both wanting more at different times. She placed orders to a sexual wellness company for couples. She periodically sent him links to graphic pornographic videos. In some emails they discussed birth control pills and acne medications and treatments.

Dr. Shuliak, 37, emerges as a complicated and unusual figure in Mr. Epstein’s world, based on a close review of the files and conversations with several people familiar with her. A native of Belarus who met Mr. Epstein when she was 21, she has not identified herself as a victim, nor have federal authorities considered her a co-conspirator in Mr. Epstein’s sex trafficking. There is no indication that the Federal Bureau of Investigation ever interviewed her, and lawyers for hundreds of his victims have never deposed her.

archive.today
u/JJJOOOO — 26 days ago

Tate Brothers - New Yorker Series "Abuse that Fueled Andrew Tate's Media Empire"

From the AP News Service:

Influencer brothers Andrew and Tristan Tate, whose social media empire promoting wealth, male dominance and misogyny has made them among the world’s most polarizing internet personalities, were arrested Saturday in Miami as British authorities sought their extradition on rape and sex trafficking charges.

The brothers were taken into custody by the U.S. Marshals Service on a sealed warrant, agency spokesperson Brady McCarron told The Associated Press, placing the United States at the center of an international legal saga that has stretched from Romania to Britain.

Britain is seeking their extradition on rape and trafficking charges

British prosecutors announced Saturday that they were seeking the brothers’ extradition on charges alleging they raped and trafficked women between 2010 and 2017.

The dual U.S. and British citizens moved to Romania in 2016. They were arrested there in 2022, accused of participating in schemes to lure women for sexual exploitation. They denied those allegations and the Romanian case hasn’t gone forward because of legal and procedural problems.

https://apnews.com/article/tate-brothers-social-influencers-arrest-82b6638219839dcf653c09309da66f16

The New Yorker writer has produced both a long format article as well as a podcast episode and both imo are worthy of a read/listen to understand the long and twisted tale of the two Tate Brothers. Also interesting is that some 'familiar' social media personalities have over the years supported the Tate brothers and these include: Candy Owens, Meghan Kelly and Tucker Carlson amongst others.

archive.today
u/JJJOOOO — 1 month ago

DM Article: "Insiders reveal bombshell 'code word' used by Justin Baldoni and Taylor Swift that will leave Blake Lively FURIOUS" - AND SO THE SMEAR and RETALIATION CONTINUE

And so the wheels on the smear and retaliation continue (yawn, we have seen it ALL before) and the narrative switches back to the talking point that Blake Lively as a working actress with years of credits, has NO CLOUT or RELEVANCE absent her connection to TAYLOR SWIFT. Right. Got it. And, its simply NOT TRUE but its another day and another opportunity to do yet another 'beat down' on Blake Lively.

There is zero creativity in the Freedman (who will eventually imo be disbarred) and Melissa Nathan (who did work for Jeffrey Epstein) narrative as they trot out YET AGAIN the name TAYLOR SWIFT to this time attempt to discredit, diminish and dismiss Blake Lively.

Quote from article:

Justin Baldoni's wife Emily stared into the camera on Wednesday and smiled a knowing smile.

'This feels like the moment,' she said, as Baldoni nodded beside her. With a carefully rehearsed casual shrug, he added: 'So, here we are.'

The moment, of course, did not come by chance. Neither did the couple's five-minute speech, lamenting 'so many painful things that have been spoken into existence over the last couple of years.'

Despite the relaxed and raw style, this was a candy-coated cruise missile, targeted and timed to perfection.

Because the Baldonis chose to break that lengthy silence while Blake Lively was still licking her wounds from the most public snubbing of her life. Just five days earlier the actress had been excluded from the wedding of her former friend, Taylor Swift. 

One thousand people snagged an invite, but neither Lively nor her husband Ryan Reynolds were among them. The subtext in Baldoni's carefully-scripted speech seemed clear: No Taylor. No clout.

Archive Link

reddit.com
u/JJJOOOO — 1 month ago
▲ 0 r/ItEndsWithTruth+1 crossposts

Lyin Bryan speaks YET AGAIN: Fox News Report = "Justin Baldoni's attorney reveals shock Friday night phone call that ended Blake Lively legal war Bryan Freedman says Blake Lively's counsel called 'out of the blue' on a Friday night requesting mediation"

Fox News Report

Quotes from article:

"The settlement that ended Justin Baldoni and Blake Lively's blockbuster legal war began with an unexpected Friday night phone call".

"Justin Baldoni's attorney, Bryan Freedman, told Fox News Digital that he received an "out of the blue" call from opposing counsel requesting mediation, setting in motion the settlement that ultimately ended Baldoni and Lively's explosive feud. Freedman said the agreement allowed his clients to publicly discuss court rulings that dismissed many of the claims against them after months of intense scrutiny".

"I think when you settle a case and your client was sued for 15 claims, of which two are dismissed by the other side voluntarily, 10 of the remaining 13 are dismissed by the court — and those involve sexual harassment and defamation — I think it's really important that the clients be able to speak about that," Freedman said.

"Because otherwise, you know, they're forever branded as being accused and responsible for that," he emphasized. "And it was important that they be able to speak about the fact that in summary judgment that the court dismissed those claims against them and that they paid nothing for the remaining claims to be resolved."

u/JJJOOOO — 2 months ago
▲ 43 r/ItEndsWithTruth+1 crossposts

No evidence that Blake Lively personally asked Sony to delete dailies — the request came through legal representatives BEFORE there was a lawsuit. This was about protecting her image NOT destroying “evidence”

NO PROOF THAT ANY DAILIES WERE DELETED. Bryan Freedman went on frenzied press tour spinning another false narrative AFTER the settlement because he knew there would be zero consequences. Team Baldoni had the “DAILES” info for over a year and would not have used it at trial because it can easily be explained away.

Based on the publicly available testimony, there does not appear to be evidence that Blake Lively herself personally contacted Sony and said "delete the dailies" Even Ange Giamatti said, “nothing urgent”. It is highly unlikely that Blake would have directly contacted Ange at Sony, who likely did not know the name of the legal representative making the request, so categorized it as “Blake asked”.

Lively explains, her depo, that her lawyers negotiated with the relevant parties regarding what would happen to sensitive footage as part of her nudity rider.  She stated "My lawyers negotiated with both the Wayfarer parties ... and Sony as well ... on what would happen to the footage that was most sensitive in nature." This part was LEFT OUT by most pro Justin Baldoni content creators and even Bryan Freedman.

Another point that often gets overlooked is timing.

The discussions about the sensitive footage occurred in September 2024 and November 2024, while the lawsuit was not filed until December 31, 2024. (Blake's deposition took place in July 2025). These discussions predated any litigation. Also, in September 2024 the online smear campaign was in full swing and I’m sure Blake Lively had no idea what was going on and wanted to ensure the birthing video was not leaked.

That timing matters because people frequently characterize the issue as "destroying evidence." But if the requests were made months before a lawsuit existed, the context appears different. The stated concern was reportedly sensitive footage, including material related to the film's birthing scene, and discussions about how that footage would be stored, protected, or handled. This is common in the film industry.

This was about protecting her IMAGE not destroying “evidence”. There was no litigation at the time the request was made – July 2024, September 2024, and November 2024... and was in accordance with her nudity rider.

 

u/Flashy_Question4631 — 2 months ago

Dan Wooten Discussing new book: "Divide and Conquer"

"Meghan Markle friends in new attack on Princess Catherine" and per Wooten it's an attempt to 'rewrite history' that he and many other journalists witnessed first hand in the early days when Markle joined the BRF.

Apologies for incorrect book title. I cannot figure out how to make correction to Post title. Correct Title is "Divide and Rule" by © Catherine Mayer, 2026.

The DM has serialized this book and here is link to one of the articles: http://archive.today/2026.06.06-200259/https://www.dailymail.com/news/article-15874105/Kate-Middleton-Catherine-Mayer-Book-Divide-Rule.html

Mayer in DM describing her book:

"After years of reporting on the royals, my new book, Divide and Rule, takes a long view of how the monarchy has reached this point. And as a feminist (I was co-founder of the former Women’s Equality Party) I also examine the decisive roles women have played in its history and how distorted views of them in turn affect attitudes to women". 

"Royal women are critical to the institution’s survival. That might seem counterintuitive, given that after the King the next two Windsors in the line of succession are also male. Women, moreover, are typically assumed to create royal crises rather than resolve them".  

"A trick patriarchy pulls is to set women against each other, placing them at opposite ends of an infernal seesaw, where, for one to rise, the other must fall, as has happened with Kate and Meghan (I shall look at Meghan’s story tomorrow)."

youtu.be
u/JJJOOOO — 2 months ago

Hollywood Report Article - David Harbour Had 'a breakdown' amid Millie Booby Brown Claims in DM article

'Apologies for title: It should read "Millie Bobby Brown" and NOT "Millie Booby Brown". Title can't be changed without deleting post. Sorry.

To be filed under: Things that make you go MMMmmmmm!

Harbours explanation of his 'behaviour quirks' are 'oddly' reminiscent of claims from another recent party who was co-owner of a production studio in a WELL KNOWN litigation (wink wink) who claims to have been 'wrongfully accused' but with no submitted discovery information to support it and whose 'stans' claim he was a 'victim of a Hollywood power play' by others. His attorney had always claimed that his weak client who co-owned the production studio had his film production 'stolen from him'.

Hollywood Reporter Article

Quotes from article:

That said, Harbour suggested he sometimes behaved in “embarrassing” ways on the Stranger Things set. 

“I do suffer from some confusing stuff — it’s confusing as hell,” Harbour added. “I think a lot of people have a friend or a brother or a co-worker that deals with mental health stuff, and they’re probably pretty confused when that person gets depressed or gets manic or has an episode".

“Under times of extreme stress, that can cause somewhat erratic behavior, and it’s embarrassing, and I’m ashamed of it,” he said. “It’s not something I choose, and I wouldn’t wish it on my worst enemy. I do feel like, for some of us, our gifts are inextricably linked with our illnesses. To have a nervous system that reacts to the world in a too-delicate way can allow me to have that moment that I love [in DTF St. Louis] on the swings with Jason. But it can also force me, in moments of extreme stress, to act a little weird.”

Perhaps Harbour can be a potential guest for any manosphere podcasts in the future to speak to the issue of 'suffering from some confusing stuff', 'erratic behavior' and the 'link between 'gifts' and 'our illnesses' in the workplace. I think I would pour a large glass of wine and listen to this one!

Such a podcast could perhaps be 'co-hosted' with Dr. Amen who might provide additional insight.

Note: No disparagement here about mental illnesses and their impact in the workplace. Nope. None. Issue is how this person imo in this article (and those that are well known to folks here in a recently settled litigation) chose to frame the 'mental health issues' in the context of treatment of cast and crew.

u/JJJOOOO — 2 months ago
▲ 17 r/ItEndsWithTruth+1 crossposts

Apologies in advance from me for an embarassing NEW PERSONAL LOW - An article from Megyn Kelly about comments made by Mark Geragos (BFF of Lyin Bryan Freedman). Article: HERE’S WHY BLAKE LIVELY’S LEGAL STRATEGY AGAINST JUSTIN BALDONI WAS ALWAYS DOOMED TO FAIL. NEW FLAIR FOR CONSPIRACIES REQUESTED

I think we need a new flair for conspiracies as there are so many of them as its really all that is going on these days!

The TikTok attorney who has a convenient grasp of the truth and being honest with subs about connections to parties to the case (you know who....the clown with the blue and red face make up) and makes SLEEPY content is now talking about the latest conspiracy that Blake Lively was in mediation in CA and pushed into that process by her attorneys who were afraid of being sued by her for malpractice. Right.

Apparently this latest conspiracy all started/ended with comments from Lyin Bryan BFF Mark Geragos) on the MK Podcast on Youtube (another BIG surprise (not) for this well worn gambit by Freedman and Kelly). The blog article from this appearance by Geragos on the MK Podcast is posted below. I won't link to MK Podcast YouTube but its not hard to find.

I decided to post content from 2 folks I believe to BOTH be deplorable (Megyn Kelly and Mark Geragos) as yet another example of how it was NEVER enough for Freedman as directed by Steve Sarowitz and Justin Baldoni imo, to just go after Blake Lively and Ryan Reynolds and anyone that had the personal courage to support them.

Nope. Never Enough. Not by a long shot as the smear and retaliation continues on at a fever pitch to this day imo. Sarowitz and Baldoni and Heath ordered up maximum 'pain and suffering' and that is what the Freedman/Nathan network has delivered now for two years and this latest Geragos conspiracy discussed in the blog post is just another installment.

Instead Freedman and Sarowitz and their hired guns Melissa Nathan and Jed Wallace and his dark web contractors wanted to inflict maximum possible pain and impact the personal business investments of Lively and Reynolds via the Court of Public Opinion and a paid for network of CCs and Reddit hacks on coordinated and controlled subreddits each day spew the provided talking points. Thing is Freedman/Nathan/Wallace seeded the mob but notw can't shut it down as its feeding on itself as its created its own world that is reminiscent of "Lord of the Flies"! Recently they have tried to bring their world to this subreddit and all I can say is, "I DON'T LIKE IT"!

Its also sadly been a longstanding 2 year campaign to discredit the Lively legal team too and it started with the CC Peppa Pig CLOWN (orange hair clown meme that looks like a human LEGO-you know the one that got ALL my posts erased!) going after Esra Hudson on rinse and repeat on such non issues as Van Zan and the CC subpoenas.

These CCs with legal licenses that they were willing to pimp out to say the things that Freedman and his band of legal thugs were unable to say due to the admonishment made to Freedman in the first hearing of the Lively v Wayfarer case. And these TikTok attorneys pimping out their legal licenses doing their paid for 'Legal PR' also spent a good amount of time going after the Lively team with a particular focus on Esra Hudson and eventually Sigrid McCawley.

Freedman evaded censure in SDNY imo as he put his words into the mouth of his clients such as Sage Steele, Perez Hilton, Billy Bush, Megyn Kelly, and his network of paid for TikTok attorneys. This continued also with passive aggressive comments and psychological assessments "even though I'm not a doctor" on MK Podcast by Lyin Bryan himself as he coloured outside the lines of the Judge Liman rules for nearly 2 years and taunted his opposition to report his statements.

Its was all shameful and wrong when this all started in 2024 and sadly we are seeing it continue still and its now devolving into conspiracy and trying to derail legislation in NY State that could help survivors.

Freedman imo always tells on himself and that is also why I posted about this article regarding suing attorneys. I very much wonder if Freedman pushed out his bestie Mark Geragos to chat with his client Megyn Kelly to start this latest conspiracy about suing attorneys for malpractice as he himself might be quite afraid (and his sucker insurers TERRIFIED) of just what might happen with the PR exercise of the filing of the Wayfarer v Lively counterclaim? I've long wondered about the dynamics and underlying agreements in place for the wacky group filing of people with quite disparate interests and so perhaps in future months we might hear about what might be going on behind the scenes regarding some likely very unhappy Freedman/Fritz/Schuster/Shapiro/Bach clients! This all would most likely play out in mediation in CA as I don't believe even Freedman would have agreed to a group filing that made zero sense from day 1 absent a mediation clause.

I do wonder if its partly to do with removing scrutiny from the MANY Freedman/TAG/MELISSA NATHAN (who did work for Jeffrey Epstein) AND Jed WALLACE many other litigations that are percolating along with rumours of at least 3 more to pop soonish.

HERE’S WHY BLAKE LIVELY’S LEGAL STRATEGY AGAINST JUSTIN BALDONI WAS ALWAYS DOOMED TO FAIL

u/JJJOOOO — 2 months ago

Hollywood Reporter Video about Freedman/Nathan/Wallace Activities

Short teaser video for the year long investigation by the Hollywood Reporter into the activities of Freedman/Nathan (who has met Jeffrey Epstein)/Wallace.

instagram.com
u/JJJOOOO — 3 months ago