u/McSlappin1407

I drank Huel for a couple of months and it gave me the idea of blending my own Huel type drink with the following ingredients. IMO it tastes much better and has better macros, but I would never have had the idea without drinking Huel first:

🫘 1 cup soaked & fully cooked chickpeas
🌱 1 tbsp ground flaxseed
1 tsp cacao powder
🥬 2-3 blocks frozen spinach
🥣 1/2 cup plain Greek yogurt
🍌 1 banana
🍓 1 cup frozen fruit/berry blend
🧊 Ice
💧 Water as needed

I’ve built a live Kalshi Sports bot that uses raw Pinnacle odds through SharpAPI as its external fair-value reference. It maintains Pinnacle odds, live game state, and Kalshi order books in memory, exactly maps each sportsbook proposition to the corresponding Kalshi YES/NO contract, and enters only when the executable Kalshi trade remains positive EV after fees, spread, depth, slippage, and fill assumptions.

The strategy is mainly trying to capture brief moments where Pinnacle has already repriced a live game but Kalshi has not fully caught up. The current local calculation time is roughly 32 ms median, receipt-to-decision is around 125 ms median, and total source-to-decision is around 538 ms median / 1.2 seconds p95. The biggest remaining question is directed to those using specifically live betting algos, what are some main things to consider that i maybe haven't so far and whether those timings are fast enough for the pricing discrepancy to survive through order submission and filling. It's worth noting i'm at quarter Kelly sizing. I'm utilizing a separate smaller bankroll while i test this out.

I’m currently keeping new pregame entries paused so I can evaluate the live strategy as a clean cohort. For anyone doing something similar, what would you focus on most: source-age limits, late-game periods, fill latency, time spent without an active sharp line, or realized performance by latency band, something else glaring that i am not considering? I’m especially interested in how you determine when a Pinnacle-to-soft-market lag is genuinely tradeable versus already stale by the time the order reaches the venue.

Seriously, if there is something i'm not considering i'll take any advice.

Just paid $7 for 35 miles of charge and I live in Alabama.

I restarted my phone this morning, when I got back to setting I noticed it said “try new Siri” as opposed to “joined waitlist” like the past week. So I click on it and it downloads the new Siri app which I can open but when I prompt something in the app it says Siri is not available on my phone yet and then I went back into settings and it now again says “joined waitlist”.. I also notice when I press the side button it’s the old Siri..

Does anyone know what’s going on or have had something similar? I literally have the app on my phone and the icon in the settings app is the new Siri but I’m still on waitlist…

I’m deciding between a BenQ and an Optoma projector for my golf simulator. The seller is willing to give me either one for effectively the same price, which makes the Optoma tempting since it would basically be about a $2K discount.

My hesitation is picture quality in terms of color and contrast. From the videos I’ve seen, the Optoma looks barely brighter but also more washed out and dull, with weaker contrast. The BenQ seems to have the much better/clearer overall image, especially with greens/blues in Golf Mode, and the contrast looks noticeably better. just all around more immersive looking.

The Optoma does have some practical advantages: longer lifespan, better dust protection, shorter throw, and it could likely be mounted almost directly above my hitting area (not sure if that would get in the way of my launch monitor which would have to be mounted roughly 25-30 inches in front of the hitting area). I’ll be using a premium gray screen either way to help with contrast and colors, but I’m not sure that would be enough to close the gap.

My hitting area will be about 9.5 feet from the screen. I think the Optoma could sit right above me, while the BenQ would need to be around 11 feet from the screen (slightly behind hitting area). My main concern with the BenQ is whether shadows would be an issue with that setup and hitting area placement. Part of me also thinks having the projector farther back might keep it more out of the way. it should be noted that either projector i go with would be mounted roughly 10 feet off the ground (10 foot wall height in my shed) and the shed it tall ranch style so extra room above walls not a flat ceiling). full room dimensions are 14w x 20d x 10h. The launch monitor will also be mounted roughly 10 ft high.

For anyone who has compared or chosen between these two, which did you go with and why? I’d also appreciate feedback on the setup, especially projector placement, shadows, and whether the Optoma’s throw/brightness advantages are worth it if the BenQ has the better image.

https://preview.redd.it/5sg1r3w86dzg1.png?width=1026&format=png&auto=webp&s=2fd1d1df0347ceaab8e7078d4f75138f0576b932