u/Memorycard1000

Hallo there. I´ve been looking for a good midrange gaming tv for a week now. I was really close to go TCL C6k or C7K but all the talk about slow responsetime with smeary picture as a result when panning the camera around, plus ghosting got me off it. I´m really tired of that from my now dead old Sony led.

So. Today I looked into Hisense and found the U7SG which lands precisely in the top of my budget. It has raving reviews, pretty much. So far so good. I got really excited. But. I watched several youtubers review. One of them put on counter strike and looked around to test the smearing, blur and whatnot. He really flicked the camera aggressively and it looked great.

Then I read Rtings review, and the cons is literally, and I quote "sports fans and gamers will be disappointed by it´s slow response time and distracting dirty screen effect."... Like, sigh! One says it´s great, the other it´s a big con. Who´s right here?

And if I don´t mix up certain terms, a youtuber literally did the dirty screen effect test and it was really good. Again. SUch mixed statements everywhere. How can it be? Anyways. I get so darn frustrated already. Any other suggestions out there? Do I need to go higher in price if I´m gonna find a mini led with great motion and picture quality in game mode?

Hallo there. I´ve been looking for a good midrange gaming tv for a week now. I was really close to go TCL C6k or C7K but all the talk about slow responsetime with smeary picture as a result when panning the camera around, plus ghosting got me off it. I´m really tired of that from my now dead old Sony led.

So. Today I looked into Hisense and found the U7SG which lands precisely in the top of my budget. It has raving reviews, pretty much. So far so good. I got really excited. But. I watched several youtubers review. One of them put on counter strike and looked around to test the smearing, blur and whatnot. He really flicked the camera aggressively and it looked great.

Then I read Rtings review, and the cons is literally, and I quote "sports fans and gamers will be disappointed by it´s slow response time and distracting dirty screen effect."... Like, sigh!

If I don´t mix up certain terms, a youtuber literally did the dirty screen effect test and it was really good. Again. SUch mixed statements everywhere. How can it be?Anyways. I get so darn frustrated already. Any other suggestions out there? Do I need to go higher in price if I´m gonna find a mini led with great motion and picture quality in game mode?

I have a really hard time with this. I know there´s tons of factors to consider between the two panels but right now I have really gotten stuck on this issue, motion.

Both kind of tvs are great today if you buy something in the higher tier brackets. Right. I think we can agree on that. Both have their pros and cons. I feel I can live with some blooming. Some burn in risk. Some dirty screen effect. Etc etc. But I have gotten hooked up in this motion debate and it drives me very hesitant in which route to go.

I have read many posts about stutter problems, but surely, in 2026, you can mitigate most of it by adding a bit of smoothing and tweaks without turning it into a soapopera concert? No? Surely a, for example Lg B6, C5 and whatnot can handle motion with some tweaks in panning shots?

Mini leds have their own problems but surely, again, in high tier mini leds, the motion handling with maybe some tweaks is very good?

I am really tempted to go with oled but I´ve seen some vids on the stuttering that hav made me very hesitant and think I prefer some ghosting, blur or whatnot. What do you think?

I have read around a ton on the C6K, C7K, P7L and some more. I'm really tempted to buy but I can't shake the whole thing about motion being bad in games and sports, but most posts and YouTube videos are from months back. So.

I have seen some say it's been patched and are now much better then on release. Any truth to that? Anyone who can confirm.