













If AI Makes Us More Creative, Why Does Everything Look the Same? (A Painter’s Perspective)
QUICK NOTE: the question in the title is rhetorical. The carousel explains the nuance and explores several related issues beyond the first slide.
If the design does not work for you, tell me specifically what you would improve. I am still refining the format, so constructive feedback is welcome.
.....
I’m a painter who sometimes writes, and this visual essay started with an odd discovery: I had used the name “Elias Thorne” in a short story, only to realize that AI models often return to that same name, along with motifs like lighthouse keepers, cathedrals, glossy landscapes, and other familiar patterns.
From an artist’s point of view, the question isn’t just whether AI is good or bad, but what happens to authorship and creativity when the tool starts making choices for us.
AI can boost productivity and even enhance individual works, but if we all lean on the same models, it might steer us toward similar ideas, characters, and visual styles.
This carousel looks at visual convergence, originality, transparency, and the role of human intention, with AI-generated images clearly labeled and sources included.
So where’s the line, does AI broaden personal creativity while making our collective output more uniform?