Feature request
u/emcro - can we get a write function via the MCP service to mark offers used please & ty
u/emcro - can we get a write function via the MCP service to mark offers used please & ty
Aroma - big oak first then I get toffee a bit of vanilla and a touch of char and I know this spent some real time in a char 5 barrel. After that a little bit of baking spice and something else I can't place.
Flavor - my sips alternate between desert level sweetness and a touch (just a touch) of bitter from a burnt wood. Sweetness is vanilla, baking chocolate, and burnt plum.
Finish - definatelly tanic some hard wood notes and they can linger finish is a bit shorter than id like. Some ash amd lots of leather that's the lasting finish with the tannins.
Overall this oscillates between very good to just off. I like it but want some more balance and consistency in the sips. Score 6.5
reSOLVED - Updated the version of n8n on my setup and pegged it to a version not just latest in the build, cleaned up some errors due to things like proxy and trust and a few other things and then things started polling correctly in the verbose logs (had to be enabled) - but it was sometimes polling before so...
Then I found the big bug - the google drive create file trigger seems to have 2 nuances I didn't know or expect. First if you move a file from a folder to a folder it doesn't typically show as new and will be ignored by the auto poller even though manual runs find it fine. Similarly if you put more than one file at a time in it will pick up one on the auto run then forever ignore the others (also not how manual trigger operates).
Now I need to design around that garbage but at least I know what it's doing now.
I'm out of ideas and need some help. I built a workflow that polls a drive folder picks up and processes files then moves them to an archive or error state - fairly simple.
It was working before I made some changes to it. I unpublished the workflow made my changes and published again. Any manual execution works exactly as expected, but the automation is not firing at all; 0 attempts in the execution log. Nothing in the log files on the host instance on errors just seems like the schedular is dead (yes I've restarted the entire instance n8n runs on several times).
I've been troubleshooting this one thing for the better part of 2 days and I'm out of ideas. The trigger is below:
I'm building a menu system at home for my wife and I. One step is computing macro information and I was using calorieapi on the free tier as it seemed fairly perfect for my use case especially now that Nutriotonix has eliminated their free tier entirely.
My issue is that I can call it fine from my local machine but I'm hosting my web side on Azure and all calls from the app service seem to be failing - suspicion is it's being blocked by their cloudflare, but I have no idea why that would be the case hoping someone has better insights than just waiting for support to get back to me.
Tech Details:
ps - 2nd attempt after removing links as I didn't want to be confused with promoting anything.
So I'm new to autopilot and the "trackers" but wanted to give it a try.
I paid for my quarter of premium and invested in 2 pilots, yet to actually have auto trading on the second I need to pay another $80 a quarter now to the pilot group too.
So what am I getting here from either it seems I'm paying 2 different agents to trade automatically a few times a quarter (historically) rather than doing it myself. I was OK with the app but then also paying the trackers each seems a bridge too far. Am I crazy here missing somethi g or other?
Detail I was using the Pelosi tracker and Actively Managed.
So after years on what's app my account was placed under review today. They only note is a link to the TOS which are massive and haven't been updated since Jan 2021.
Today I talked to 4 people then the app shut down. I would highly doubt I was reported by any of them based on our conversations. I read maybe due to having to many conversations with people not in the contact list.
So the question is - is there any way to see what triggers this so you can actually avoid it or are all the posts of the new "security theatre" under Meta just the truth and this app needs to go.
MakeUp:
- 12&19 Yr Rye
- 15&20 Yr Corn
- Finished in ex-Red wine and New Oak barrels
- 123.2 proof
Aroma: Initially I get red wine and vanilla and a bit of heat a mix of ethanol and maybe a touch of peppermint. After the initial hints fade back more baking spice and raspberry and some more sweetnees like a buttery sweet bread.
Taste: initial hit is raspberry desert big sweet front vanilla, cola, and then the baking spice. More sips develop the sweetness firther bringing out caramel and maybe some maple syrup. The wood notes are quite subtle and shown more in the after.
Finish: Long, oily, and a good amount of tannins and oak. The peppermint makes a reappearance here as well. Mmm thisnsits nice after a sip. More spice and that custardy sweetness swing through.
Big, Bold, Complex, everything I want in whiskey. This is delicious, my favorite t/bourbon bottle amd sadly the last pour from it. This drinks sooop far under proof as its warming but never harsh. Honesty a top 10 pour for me and why i sat on the last couple ounces for so long as i didnt want it to end. I feel like my review understates the wine barrell component but it shouldnt its great depth.
Score: 9.5 u/t8ke tell me you have a safety stock bottle somewhere PLEASE.
Can we unlock more than one at a time please!
No reason to wait for one to clear if we have the bilt cash let us blow it
I'm now in a don't use the card until I can unlock the next one mode
Bottled 2023 Barrell 6621
The oldest heavin hill I've had (my favorite distillery)
Paid ~200
I love the aroma on this, it's a perfect marriage of oak, caramel, a bit of brown sugar and vanilla more sweet but just lovely. A fantastic example of what I love about HH.
Palate is good, and while I wosh this was another 20 points of proof it is not light like some reviews claim. Its got oak forward notes a bit of cinamon loads of brown sugar and maybe a bit of bread and stone fruit.
Finish is clean and a bit shorter than I'd like (missing proof) more vanilla in the finish a good amount of tannin from the wood and I think tobacco.
Honestly at 100 bucks I'd never not have this at home at the 250 I saw it for last week it was a tough pass. If your a fan of HH I can recommend if the price doesn't flip you off.
Score 8.5