u/New-Dimension5664

Just finished Jesse Michael's interview of John Herrington. I'll admit it was a rollercoaster ride for me watching it. I was excited going in because of Brent Friedman's recount of events on the Sound Light and Frequency Podcast. I naively thought this man may be another whistleblower who was older, kinda like Hal Putoff. What we got was not that!

Here are my theories on John Herrington they are not mutually separate, in fact I think a little bit from all these things was going on during the interview.
-I worked as a controller at the world's busiest Tracon for 22 years. When the FAA administrator visited our facility and I talked with him I was struck about how little they knew of the actual air traffic control side of things even though they were the administrator, they were in essence a figure head. John Herrington gave me those vibes totally! A figure head who legitimately didn't know things.
-Yet, at times he sounded like an absolute gate keeper, the proverbial "them/they" we've been talking about for years! The way he discredited Brent, Hollywood, and UFO culture. He even dangled a carrot to all of us with the nuclear powered bomber sitting in an Idaho hangar. This sounds like pure disinformation by sprinkling in a bit of truth!

I loved when Jesse asked him about majestic 12 trying to suss out if maybe he was one of them!

-Now for the really sad part. I also think part of this man has bought into the narrative that he is a patriot to our country by constantly dismissing the UFO/UAP phenomenon. He gave me heavy Collin's elite vibes. He even made it known early in the interview that his epistemological view was Christianity and belief in UFO's would punch a big hole in that belief. Jesse tried to offer an alternative that both could be true but he wasn't really listening.

-This man gave me total Trump vibes at times. The Fauci comments, the constant ripping of Stanford and certain programs, the dismissal of evidence by Jesse. Yet, at other times there was a crack of some acknowledgement of the phenomenon.

This interview has left me completely perplexed. On one hand if he is the "them" he's provided us all a pretty good roadmap of who is part of the "them" through history, look at all the names he enthusiastically supported and follow the trail of people to identify the opposition. The other side though, he sounded uninformed and confused.

I'm really curious what everyone thinks about this interview.

Is this really the face of the opposition coming out of the shadows?

I am relatively new to the frontier of AI. I attended Contact in the Desert and listened to a wonderful presentation by Deep Prasad. He educated me on where the current models and agents working under those models are at. It changed my world view. In some ways it is my ontological shock.

Knowing that humanity is close to sharing existence with something that is vastly more intelligent than us I am left speculating on how it's being used today and where we see this limitless knowledge being implemented. I turn my
Speculation to the federal government. If our government has access to frontier ai models we should see intelligent decisions filtering into what they are doing...?

Since we don't see this currently, I'm left with some thoughts.

1. Our leaders are ego driven and would never ask Ai for advice. If they did, they simply do not follow it.
2. Our leaders don't understand Ai or its capabilities.
3. Ai is being utilized and what we see is a Ai Machiavellian plan that none of us understand.
4. Ai is playing the long game.