r/UfoUapNews

La Disclosure UFO/UAP è davvero iniziata nel 2026?

Negli ultimi mesi, il governo degli Stati Uniti ha pubblicato una quantità crescente di materiale relativo ai fenomeni anomali non identificati: video, fotografie, documenti e rapporti provenienti da diverse agenzie governative.

Ma c'è un dettaglio che rischia di passare inosservato.

Prima degli ultimi rilasci esisteva già un archivio ufficiale.

Un archivio costruito e pubblicato da AARO — All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office, l'ufficio del Dipartimento della Difesa incaricato di rilevare, analizzare e attribuire i fenomeni anomali.

Dal 2022 al gennaio 2026, AARO ha pubblicato 32 video UAP.

Sfere.
Oggetti dalle forme non convenzionali.
Fenomeni osservati sopra l'acqua.
E immagini che sembrano mostrare comportamenti difficili da interpretare.

Allora perché questi video non sono mai stati percepiti come una vera e propria “disclosure”?

In questo episodio ricostruiamo la storia che porta da AAWSAP e AATIP, passando per Luis Elizondo, i video FLIR, GIMBAL e GOFAST, le audizioni del Congresso e la nascita di AARO, fino ai più recenti rilasci del governo statunitense.

La disclosure è davvero iniziata con gli ultimi file?

Oppure era già cominciata anni fa… semplicemente senza essere riconosciuta come tale?

Forse il punto non è soltanto ciò che viene rilasciato.

Ma chi decide cosa viene mostrato, quando viene mostrato e come deve essere interpretato.

Questa è ARGUS Investigation.

Questa è la RELEASE 0.

⚠️ Nota: ARGUS Investigation distingue tra fatti documentati, dichiarazioni ufficiali, testimonianze e ipotesi. La presenza di un fenomeno non identificato non costituisce automaticamente prova di origine extraterrestre.

DISCLOSURE UFO/UAP: Release 0 | ARGUS Investigation Ep18

#ARGUSInvestigation #UAP #UFO #Disclosure #AARO #UAPDisclosure #UFODisclosure #Pentagono #LuisElizondo #AATIP #AAWSAP #UAPVideos #UAPFiles #USGovernment #UnidentifiedAnomalousPhenomena #davidgrusch

Hey everyone.

I know we’re all in thinking the same thing, and sadly, that’s them winning.

I’m starting to really think this whole UFO disclosure is really a bunch of b.s to blind us from the truth. The rich and powerful already seized control of the government. Do you really believe these “documents” being released are real?

Think about it, if the government had something to hide, why would they allow it to be released? It would completely discredit them. The only information being released, is what they want us to believe. They have people in the government pretending to be part of this disclosure act. I’m telling you, we are losing this race, and if we don’t stand up and unite as a whole, they will win. That’s of course assuming they haven’t already discovered and reengineered space time technology, which for all we know, could allow them to change the past simply to create a new outcome. Or they can do whatever they want, and then disappear. Obviously I’m CNN o expert, I’m just a very wise individual who is PRAYING, there’s other people out here smart enough to know they need to stand up and take back what belongs to us.

This is a long article. I do agree with some of it. Amd some of it is a little alarming.

I dont get excited because I think "space brothers are here to save us!"

They have never saved us before. From anything, that I'm aware of. Not a single volcano, earthquake, war, genocide, tsunami, pollution causing climate change and abnormal weather patterns, nothing.

On the other hand, they aren't necessarily demonic decievers. Demonic is a description, generally having to do with behavior.

But that doesnt mean we should take any communication at face value.

Im concerned because looking at this through a purely theological lense is dangerous.

Its a big unknown. How many species are unknown. The intentions are unknown. I dont think we should assign intent until we know who is doing what, and why.

Dr Eric Davis said during the congressional hearings that there are 4 species recognized by the US government.

Are there more species or subspecies not recognized by the US government? Are there more species recognized by other governments?

Where are they from? David Grusch said during the congressional hearings that he didn't want to use the word 'extraterrestrial' because he didn't want to designate origin. So, they come from different places?

Im no fan of dr Phil, and I'm honestly sick that hes been designated "the guy".

But David Grusch was on a podcast with "the guy". And according to him, we have recovered and "contained" ( imprisoned? Indefinitely held.without charges? No phone call?) both dead and live NHI pilots. Not just craft.

All of the articles Ive seen written from a religious perspective are pretty.disturbing. the articles are wriiten to pretty much tell people what they should think. Okay, I agree with fhe fact that we shouldn't worship them In any form, or look to them for any form of salvation. We don't know what the intent/intentions are.

And yes, religious leaders telling people what they should think is nothing new.

But, these religious leaders of different backgrounds are either hinting or saying outright thay they have been involved with government officials and TOLD how to handle those questions.

And they all seem to be Christian, of different denominations.

Have any non Christian religious leaders mentioned or hinted that they were contacted by government officials and told how to handle the questions? Or just suddenly writing or speaking about UAP/NHI?

Is this happening in other countries besides the US?

If you're into UFOs, alleged extraterrestrial civilisations, abduction cases, exopolitics, contactees, or the stranger side of UFO history, you might want to bookmark this.

I came across **Exopaedia**, an online encyclopaedia dedicated to collecting and organising information about extraterrestrial-related subjects. It has an enormous alphabetical index covering everything from UFO cases and alleged alien civilisations to researchers, projects, locations, historical figures, and obscure terminology.

What caught my attention is how much of it is organised like a reference database rather than a typical UFO blog. You can search specific subjects or just start browsing the index and go down some serious rabbit holes.

Anybody else finding a lot of non blinking moving objects in the sky which don’t behave like flights or satellites while waiting to see meteor shower?

🛸 Oui j' ai vue des photographies , des vidéos

sur des recherches très sérieuses sur les ovnis..

Pour moi c'est du trompe l'oeil.. tout ce qui arrive par rapport au phénomène extraterrestre, enlèvement ,démonstration de puissance, et j' en passe n' est qu'une simple éducation planétaire qu 'ils font depuis que le monde est monde ....'ils nous montrent ce que eux veulent bien nous montré..

_La terre n' est pas très évolué

Moi si je m'approche d' un tribut qui n' est pas au courant du modernisme je ne lui tapperait pas de quoi pour que son mental ne

l' accepte pas... Je lui offrirais de quoi pour l' émerveillé et accroché son intérêt sans brusquer quoi que ce soit simplement pour qu' il me remarque... m'observe et sache ma présence..

_Pour moi les ovnis dans notre atmosphère font comme moi quand je m'approche d' une tribut .. je n' ouvre pas mon jeu tout de suite ..au fond tout approche que ce soit moi où des aliens ce n' est que de la psychologie..

_Tout n' est qu'au fond du trompe l'oeil.. L' humain fonctionne par les sens vue , l' ouïe, touché..

Les êtres d' ailleurs, nous montrent par des apparitions, enlèvement, témoin, vidéo, film tout ça ..oui ils le veulent c'est très volontaire de leur part, ce n'est que de la préparation mentale sur nous..(psychologie )

_Et oui ça fonctionne tellement bien que ça se propage comme une poudré de canon ..et dire le contraire semble déplaire à la majorité, parce qu'il ne voit pas derrière la réalité du phénomène.

À la prochaine bye bye 👋

On August 9, 2026, the same aerial object was recorded across three separate cameras operating within the same field array.

The opening comparison shows the three views together before presenting the individual recordings:

• Camera 1: 4K/8MP UHD PTZ
• Camera 2: 4K PTZ tracking camera
• Camera 3: 4K optical zoom camera

The most interesting part of this capture is the structure that remains visible between the different views. The closer recording shows a pronounced central section with extended lateral geometry, while the other cameras provide separate perspectives of the same event.

During review of the footage, the following observations were recorded:

• No camera artifact identified
• No optical illusion identified
• Dark window-like regions visible in multiple frames
• Metallic appearance
• No acoustic signature

The video uses original observational frames only. The object itself has not been recreated or generated.

Later in the sequence, one of the wider camera views also records normal air traffic and a visible contrail in the surrounding sky while the tracked object remains in frame, providing additional environmental context for the observation.

The purpose of presenting all three recordings together is simply to make the comparison available. Rather than relying on a single enlarged frame, the object can be examined across multiple independent camera views from the same field event.

Original source:
jrprudence.com

One thing I've always found confusing is that despite there being what seems to be a very large community of people interested in UAPs there aren't any ground breaking close up video footage that surfaces. Aren't there groups using decent drones with cameras surveilling for them? Or even people using drones for non-UAP research. With all the cameras, tech and interest it's surprising there isn't ONE close up video.

I understand the whole random nature of being at the right place at the right time. But with so many human witness stories of reporting seeing something close up how is it not possible a consumer drone hasn't been at the right place at the right time? Like ever? Would love to hear some others opinions on this.

Tim Burchett, discussing a briefing on unidentified aerial phenomena, says the public would be shocked by what was seen, describes it as a potential paradigm shift, notes pilots reporting objects moving far faster than current capabilities and hovering for hours, argues that credible material is being kept secret or outsourced to private contractors not subject to FOIA, urges President Trump to take a public step toward disclosure despite political risk, laments bureaucratic barriers and fragmented data, rejects simplistic explanations, asserts Americans deserve transparency with credible witnesses including pilots and possibly scientists, criticizes AARO, recalls pushback from some lawmakers, and remains hopeful that a bold public disclosure could finally bring accountability and clarity.

This 15 minute rabbit hole is about who owns the story when things in the sky start acting strange. Perhaps the early implementation of Directive 1(made famous by Bob Lazar) even back to the late 1800s. It traces a single pipeline of named individuals from 1879 newspaper rooms through Masonic publishing networks, into the highest levels of US Government, into Canadian intelligence outposts, and out the other side as modern Arctic sensor grids and domestic propaganda. The management of the sightings is older than the word "UFO."